RallyIQ

Game plan

Raphael Collignon v Guillermo Vilas

Every number combines what Raphael Collignon does well with what Guillermo Vilas allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Raphael Collignon wins, best of 3 72%90%: 34%–94% · best of 5: 77%
Serve points won 63.8% / 59.1% Raphael / Guillermo · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 72%serve 63.8% / 59.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Raphael Collignon's record against Guillermo Vilas's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerRaphaelGuillermo
Direction choice±0.00 ±0.08
better than 56%
−0.79 ±0.13
better than 0%
Shot selection+0.31 ±0.27
better than 81%
−0.45 ±0.60
better than 13%
Execution−0.34 ±0.59
better than 52%
+0.88 ±1.06
better than 94%
Points left on the table2.32 ±0.21
lower than 82%
4.15 ±0.84
lower than 3%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Raphael Collignon serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRaphael winsv GuillermoMatchupOptimal
Wide42%72%67%66.4%±10.255% ▲
Body12%67%65%68.3%±13.412%
T46%72%75%72.1%±10.933% ▼

Optimal v Guillermo Vilas: +0.2±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRaphael winsv GuillermoMatchupOptimal
Wide38%74%76%77.1%±10.151% ▲
Body10%59%71%67.6%±14.30% ▼
T52%72%65%65.0%±11.049% ▼

Optimal v Guillermo Vilas: +0.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +7.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Guillermo Vilas serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGuillermo winsv RaphaelMatchupOptimal
Wide22%62%75%64.5%±12.835% ▲
Body13%52%67%56.6%±14.60% ▼
T64%61%76%62.0%±10.565%

Optimal v Raphael Collignon: +0.4±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGuillermo winsv RaphaelMatchupOptimal
Wide63%63%70%60.1%±11.463%
Body13%66%62%65.2%±14.90% ▼
T24%72%67%66.9%±12.537% ▲

Optimal v Raphael Collignon: +0.3±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Raphael Collignon returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GuillermoValue
FH through the middle61%+4.3+1.9−1.7+4.5±3.0
FH crosscourt25%+5.5+0.9+1.3+7.7±4.3
FH down the line14%+1.7−0.3+4.0+5.5±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.3±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (150 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GuillermoValue
BH through the middle43%+6.4+1.4+1.5+9.3±2.9
BH crosscourt30%+8.8+3.3+0.9+13.0±3.4
BH slice crosscourt9%+0.5−1.2−0.9−1.5±2.5
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2+0.1+2.2−2.0±2.2
BH slice down the line5%−8.4+0.7+1.4−6.3±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.5±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (122 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GuillermoValue
BH through the middle49%−2.9+1.4+0.1−1.4±2.6
BH crosscourt35%+1.0+0.2+1.0+2.2±3.0
BH down the line8%−0.2+0.6−3.3−2.9±3.5
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.3+0.7−1.8±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.5±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (65 returns charted)

Guillermo Vilas returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RaphaelValue
FH through the middle55%+4.3−2.6+3.1+4.8±3.0
FH crosscourt24%+5.5+1.7+6.0+13.2±4.2
FH down the line21%+1.7−3.3−2.9−4.5±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +8.4±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (84 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RaphaelValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+0.7+2.3+9.4±2.9
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2+0.8−0.8−4.2±2.0
BH down the line19%+4.2+0.9+1.6+6.7±4.4
BH crosscourt9%+8.8−1.9+0.8+7.7±3.0
BH slice down the line6%−8.4−0.9+1.1−8.1±2.4

Lean BH through the middle: +4.9±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (121 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RaphaelValue
BH through the middle45%−2.9−0.1+0.7−2.3±2.6
BH down the line19%−0.2+1.5−2.8−1.5±4.5
BH crosscourt13%+1.0+0.7+1.2+2.9±2.5
FH inside-in12%+0.6+0.1−2.8−2.2±3.6
FH through the middle12%−2.9+0.9+0.7−1.3±2.2

Lean BH down the line: −0.2±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (95 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Raphael Collignon

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · rally+5.0±2.0+2.5+2.5
BH to the middle · return+3.8±3.4+1.9+2.0
FH to the middle · rally+3.4±2.3+2.8+0.5
BH to their backhand · return+3.1±4.8+2.6+0.6
FH to their forehand · return+2.7±6.1−0.9+3.6
BH to their backhand · rally+1.8±2.5+1.0+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return−0.6±3.6+0.9−1.5
FH to their forehand · rally−0.5±3.2+0.5−1.1
BH to their forehand · rally+1.6±4.1+0.6+0.9
FH to their backhand · rally+1.8±2.8+0.6+1.2
BH to their backhand · rally+1.8±2.5+1.0+0.8

Guillermo Vilas

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally+5.3±4.3+3.6+1.7
FH to their backhand · rally+4.6±4.1+2.8+1.8
BH to the middle · return+3.4±3.3+1.2+2.2
FH to the middle · rally+3.0±2.9+0.3+2.7
BH to their backhand · rally+2.9±2.8+3.7−0.8
BH to the middle · rally+2.4±2.5+0.1+2.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return−1.7±3.5−3.9+2.2
FH to their forehand · rally−0.9±4.1−2.7+1.7
FH to the middle · serve +1−0.2±3.6+0.3−0.5
BH to the middle · rally+2.4±2.5+0.1+2.4
BH to their backhand · rally+2.9±2.8+3.7−0.8

Against Guillermo Vilas-like opponents

Raphael Collignon vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.5%37.1%