RallyIQ

Game plan

Sebastian Baez v Marco Cecchinato

Every number combines what Sebastian Baez does well with what Marco Cecchinato allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Sebastian Baez wins, best of 3 73%90%: 53%–88% · best of 5: 78%
Serve points won 62.0% / 57.2% Sebastian / Marco · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 70%serve 62.3% / 58.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Sebastian Baez's record against Marco Cecchinato's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.5 on serve, +5.2 on return vs expectation (759 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerSebastianMarco
Direction choice−0.08 ±0.10
better than 34%
+0.12 ±0.11
better than 85%
Shot selection+0.02 ±0.14
better than 54%
−0.31 ±0.19
better than 23%
Execution−0.04 ±0.36
better than 66%
−0.64 ±0.76
better than 39%
Points left on the table2.58 ±0.13
lower than 51%
2.52 ±0.12
lower than 58%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Sebastian Baez serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSebastian winsv MarcoMatchupOptimal
Wide46%66%74%66.6%±6.946%
Body22%61%71%68.7%±8.335% ▲
T32%59%73%56.9%±6.719% ▼

Optimal v Marco Cecchinato: +0.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +4.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSebastian winsv MarcoMatchupOptimal
Wide30%60%72%59.0%±6.430%
Body19%62%62%61.6%±10.46% ▼
T51%64%76%68.7%±7.364% ▲

Optimal v Marco Cecchinato: +0.9±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Marco Cecchinato serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarco winsv SebastianMatchupOptimal
Wide41%71%68%66.0%±6.128% ▼
Body7%64%61%61.1%±11.36%
T53%69%73%67.1%±5.766% ▲

Optimal v Sebastian Baez: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarco winsv SebastianMatchupOptimal
Wide62%67%70%63.0%±5.656% ▼
Body7%55%56%47.9%±12.00% ▼
T31%67%73%68.9%±6.744% ▲

Optimal v Sebastian Baez: +0.9±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +5.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Sebastian Baez returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcoValue
FH through the middle39%+4.3+0.6−0.9+4.0±2.5
FH down the line20%+1.7+2.2+2.1+6.1±4.3
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2−0.5−0.7−5.5±2.2
FH crosscourt13%+5.5+0.4+1.3+7.2±4.4
FH slice crosscourt6%−4.3+1.3−0.1−3.1±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (679 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcoValue
BH through the middle47%+6.4+0.4+0.2+7.1±2.1
BH crosscourt27%+8.8−1.3−2.0+5.5±3.0
BH down the line10%+4.2+2.6−0.1+6.7±4.6
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2−1.8−0.7−6.7±2.5
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−2.1+0.8−0.7±3.0

Lean BH through the middle: +2.3±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (748 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcoValue
FH through the middle58%−3.5+2.8+1.2+0.5±2.8
FH crosscourt23%−0.2−0.4+0.6+0.1±4.3
FH down the line18%−1.8+0.7+0.3−0.8±4.7

Lean FH through the middle: +0.3±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (226 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcoValue
BH through the middle32%−2.9+0.1+0.6−2.2±2.3
BH crosscourt23%+1.0−1.1−0.7−0.7±3.0
FH inside-out16%+1.0−2.1+0.3−0.8±3.6
FH through the middle13%−2.9−0.4+1.2−2.1±2.4
BH down the line9%−0.2−2.9+1.9−1.2±5.0
FH inside-in6%+0.6−0.4+0.6+0.8±4.2

Lean FH inside-in: +2.1±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (566 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Marco Cecchinato returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SebastianValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3−0.3+2.0+6.0±2.5
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+2.3+5.7+13.5±3.9
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2−1.8−0.6−6.6±2.3
FH down the line15%+1.7−2.4+2.8+2.1±4.0
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3+0.1+0.6−3.6±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +9.7±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (184 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SebastianValue
BH through the middle32%+6.4+2.9+1.9+11.1±2.2
BH crosscourt25%+8.8−4.6+2.2+6.4±2.9
BH slice through the middle19%−4.2−2.0+0.4−5.8±2.4
BH down the line12%+4.2−1.4+3.5+6.4±4.5
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−2.8−0.9−3.1±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +6.9±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (414 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SebastianValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+1.4−1.2−3.3±2.7
FH down the line30%−1.8−5.3+0.7−6.4±4.4
FH crosscourt26%−0.2−0.4±0.0−0.7±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.9±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (70 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SebastianValue
BH crosscourt37%+1.0−1.9−0.7−1.5±2.9
BH through the middle31%−2.9−3.5+0.1−6.2±2.3
BH down the line10%−0.2−0.4+0.8+0.2±4.8
FH through the middle7%−2.9+1.2−1.2−2.9±2.1
BH slice crosscourt4%−4.0−1.2±0.0−5.2±1.3

Lean BH down the line: +3.7±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (211 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Sebastian Baez

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+8.6±4.7+4.9+3.6
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.2±3.5+2.7+0.5
BH to their forehand · return+3.0±5.3+1.1+1.9
BH to the middle · return+2.9±2.1+1.3+1.6
FH to the middle · serve +1+2.9±3.1+2.1+0.8
FH to their backhand · return+2.9±4.4−1.1+3.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−7.2±6.8−4.5−2.7
BH to their forehand · return +1−6.9±6.7±0.0−6.9
FH to their backhand · rally−2.5±2.3±0.0−2.4
BH slice to the middle · return−2.0±3.5−1.4−0.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1−1.6±3.6+0.9−2.6

Marco Cecchinato

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+7.8±5.3+3.1+4.7
FH to their forehand · return +1+3.6±4.5+3.5+0.1
BH to the middle · return+3.6±2.1+2.3+1.3
BH to their backhand · return +1+2.8±3.3+2.8±0.0
BH to their forehand · return+1.9±5.7−3.5+5.4
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.6±4.7+0.7+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−6.7±4.4−9.3+2.6
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.9±3.0−2.3−1.6
BH to their forehand · rally−2.2±4.7−2.0−0.2
FH to their forehand · rally−1.8±2.6+0.2−2.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1−1.7±3.0−1.8+0.1

Against Marco Cecchinato-like opponents

Sebastian Baez vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–57.8%39.7%
Players most similar to Marco Cecchinato5 56.4%45.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Joao Fonseca, Lorenzo Musetti, Carlos Alcaraz, Fabian Marozsan, Pedro Martinez, Thiago Seyboth Wild, Yannick Hanfmann, Francisco Cerundolo, Dusan Lajovic, Philipp Kohlschreiber. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.