RallyIQ

Game plan

Thiago Seyboth Wild v Tomas Machac

Every number combines what Thiago Seyboth Wild does well with what Tomas Machac allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Thiago Seyboth Wild wins, best of 3 25%90%: 7%–54% · best of 5: 19%
Serve points won 60.3% / 65.8% Thiago / Tomas · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 25%serve 60.3% / 65.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Thiago Seyboth Wild's record against Tomas Machac's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.5 on serve, −1.1 on return vs expectation (388 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerThiagoTomas
Direction choice−0.07 ±0.10
better than 38%
+0.12 ±0.07
better than 83%
Shot selection+0.05 ±0.27
better than 59%
+0.08 ±0.15
better than 63%
Execution−0.65 ±0.44
better than 39%
+0.15 ±0.51
better than 75%
Points left on the table2.74 ±0.17
lower than 36%
2.35 ±0.10
lower than 79%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Thiago Seyboth Wild +0.97, Tomas Machac +0.61. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Thiago Seyboth Wild serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowThiago winsv TomasMatchupOptimal
Wide49%68%74%69.1%±5.959% ▲
Body6%62%66%64.3%±12.80% ▼
T45%71%78%74.2%±5.841% ▼

Optimal v Tomas Machac: +0.2±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowThiago winsv TomasMatchupOptimal
Wide59%69%71%66.3%±6.251% ▼
Body5%68%60%64.8%±14.60% ▼
T36%70%68%65.8%±7.349% ▲

Optimal v Tomas Machac: +0.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Tomas Machac serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowTomas winsv ThiagoMatchupOptimal
Wide44%67%75%68.7%±6.438% ▼
Body6%62%55%54.1%±12.40% ▼
T49%74%74%72.5%±5.862% ▲

Optimal v Thiago Seyboth Wild: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowTomas winsv ThiagoMatchupOptimal
Wide46%70%75%71.7%±6.059% ▲
Body8%64%55%55.2%±12.60% ▼
T46%72%70%69.6%±6.641% ▼

Optimal v Thiago Seyboth Wild: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Thiago Seyboth Wild returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TomasValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3+1.2+1.3+6.7±2.5
FH down the line18%+1.7−0.7+2.9+3.8±4.3
FH slice through the middle14%−4.2−1.7−0.2−6.1±2.3
FH crosscourt12%+5.5−1.4+4.9+9.1±4.2
FH slice down the line6%−4.3−0.5+1.8−3.0±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.6±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (311 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TomasValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4+0.4+1.8+8.6±2.3
BH crosscourt26%+8.8−0.3+2.2+10.7±3.3
BH down the line13%+4.2−0.9±0.0+3.4±4.6
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.8±0.0−6.0±2.5
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−0.2+0.3+0.6±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.8±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (374 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TomasValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5±0.0+1.0−2.5±2.7
FH down the line30%−1.8−2.9+2.2−2.5±4.5
FH crosscourt18%−0.2+2.6+1.6+4.0±3.8

Lean FH through the middle: −1.1±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (73 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TomasValue
BH through the middle39%−2.9−1.2−1.2−5.2±2.2
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4+1.4+2.8±3.0
FH through the middle10%−2.9±0.0+1.0−1.9±2.2
BH down the line10%−0.2+2.1+2.0+3.9±4.8
FH inside-out7%+1.0−1.8+2.2+1.4±3.4

Lean BH down the line: +4.6±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (210 returns charted)

Tomas Machac returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
FH through the middle48%+4.3+2.7+2.0+8.9±2.5
FH down the line27%+1.7+1.7−0.4+3.0±4.2
FH crosscourt17%+5.5+3.2+3.4+12.0±4.4
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.2−1.1−6.6±2.2
FH slice down the line3%−4.3+1.3−0.9−3.9±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.4±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (465 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
BH through the middle37%+6.4+1.1+0.7+8.2±2.3
BH crosscourt31%+8.8+3.1+2.5+14.4±3.2
BH slice through the middle13%−4.2+2.1−0.5−2.6±2.4
BH down the line9%+4.2+2.2+1.9+8.3±4.6
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−0.5−1.6−1.6±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.2±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (508 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
FH through the middle39%−3.5+1.7+0.5−1.3±2.9
FH down the line33%−1.8−0.2−1.1−3.1±4.7
FH crosscourt24%−0.2+2.3+2.7+4.8±4.3
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7−0.5±0.0−13.2±1.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.6±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (163 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThiagoValue
BH crosscourt51%+1.0+1.0+0.6+2.7±2.9
BH through the middle37%−2.9+0.5−0.5−2.9±2.3
BH down the line9%−0.2−1.1−4.1−5.4±4.9
FH through the middle3%−2.9+0.4+0.5−1.9±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.9±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (339 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Thiago Seyboth Wild

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+5.7±2.7+2.2+3.5
FH to their forehand · return+4.4±4.1+1.1+3.2
BH to the middle · rally+3.0±1.7+1.2+1.9
BH to their forehand · return+2.9±4.3+1.6+1.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.8±3.2+1.3+1.5
FH to the middle · return+2.4±2.1+0.9+1.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−2.7±4.7−3.5+0.7
FH to their backhand · return +1−2.3±3.8+0.7−3.0
FH to the middle · rally−1.0±2.0−0.7−0.3
BH to their forehand · return +1−0.8±4.9−0.4−0.3
FH to their forehand · return +1−0.6±3.9−1.1+0.5

Tomas Machac

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+9.5±4.2+4.9+4.6
FH to the middle · return+4.8±2.1+2.8+2.0
BH to their backhand · return+3.4±2.4+1.2+2.2
FH to the middle · return +1+2.7±2.7+1.4+1.3
BH to their forehand · rally+2.4±3.6+1.1+1.2
BH to their forehand · return +1+2.0±4.9+2.7−0.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.9±3.3−2.3−1.6
FH to their backhand · return +1−3.9±3.9±0.0−3.9
FH to their backhand · rally−2.4±2.3−1.1−1.3
BH to their forehand · serve +1−2.2±4.5−0.4−1.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.1±2.8−2.6+0.5

Against Tomas Machac-like opponents

Thiago Seyboth Wild vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–60.7%36.6%
Players most similar to Tomas Machac2 64.9%35.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Hubert Hurkacz, Sebastian Korda, Zhizhen Zhang, Karen Khachanov, Laslo Djere, Benjamin Bonzi, Fabio Fognini, Borna Coric, Kei Nishikori, Viktor Troicki. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.