RallyIQ

Game plan

Alex Michelsen v Rinky Hijikata

Every number combines what Alex Michelsen does well with what Rinky Hijikata allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Alex Michelsen wins, best of 3 78%90%: 34%–98% · best of 5: 84%
Serve points won 61.6% / 55.6% Alex / Rinky · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 77%serve 61.3% / 55.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Alex Michelsen's record against Rinky Hijikata's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +5.1 on serve, −1.6 on return vs expectation (182 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerAlexRinky
Direction choice−0.19 ±0.11
better than 15%
+0.05 ±0.09
better than 70%
Shot selection+0.32 ±0.16
better than 82%
+0.25 ±0.27
better than 75%
Execution+0.61 ±0.49
better than 86%
−0.22 ±0.71
better than 57%
Points left on the table2.70 ±0.27
lower than 40%
2.53 ±0.15
lower than 57%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Alex Michelsen +1.30, Rinky Hijikata +1.24. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Alex Michelsen serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlex winsv RinkyMatchupOptimal
Wide48%75%75%77.7%±6.261% ▲
Body15%67%65%68.5%±12.12% ▼
T37%77%71%73.6%±7.537%

Optimal v Rinky Hijikata: +0.6±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlex winsv RinkyMatchupOptimal
Wide52%68%75%70.5%±7.652%
Body16%66%58%61.3%±14.93% ▼
T32%64%74%66.8%±8.645% ▲

Optimal v Rinky Hijikata: +0.8±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Rinky Hijikata serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRinky winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide48%67%70%64.3%±7.861% ▲
Body8%53%59%48.4%±14.39%
T43%69%71%65.4%±8.630% ▼

Optimal v Alex Michelsen: +0.8±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRinky winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide50%77%77%80.3%±6.363% ▲
Body6%63%63%62.8%±15.80% ▼
T44%72%75%75.5%±7.437% ▼

Optimal v Alex Michelsen: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Alex Michelsen returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RinkyValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+1.4+1.1+6.7±2.8
FH down the line25%+1.7+1.2−0.7+2.2±4.5
FH crosscourt16%+5.5+3.8−0.2+9.1±4.4
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−2.2+0.9−5.5±1.9
FH slice down the line5%−4.3−0.6±0.0−4.9±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.4±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (286 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RinkyValue
BH crosscourt40%+8.8−0.2+1.2+9.8±3.5
BH through the middle37%+6.4+1.8+1.7+9.9±2.8
BH down the line9%+4.2−2.8−1.9−0.4±4.4
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.7+0.1−4.8±2.3
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−1.9+0.1−1.3±2.5

Lean BH through the middle: +3.1±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (224 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RinkyValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5+0.8+1.6−1.0±2.9
FH down the line34%−1.8−0.1−3.1−5.0±4.7
FH crosscourt16%−0.2+4.1+0.6+4.5±4.2
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7−0.2±0.0−12.9±1.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.5±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (136 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RinkyValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9+0.6+3.3+1.1±2.5
BH crosscourt40%+1.0+1.2+3.1+5.4±3.2
BH down the line13%−0.2+0.3+1.9+2.0±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.4±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (134 returns charted)

Rinky Hijikata returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3−0.6+1.6+5.2±2.7
FH crosscourt29%+5.5+1.0+0.1+6.6±4.4
FH down the line14%+1.7−1.0+1.7+2.4±4.4
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+0.8+0.3−3.1±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.7±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (222 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+2.1−0.5+8.1±2.6
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−2.7+1.8+7.9±3.5
BH down the line12%+4.2−2.2−2.0±0.0±4.5
BH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.6+1.5−3.3±2.4
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−1.3−0.1−0.9±2.8

Lean BH through the middle: +3.6±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (222 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5+0.6+2.2−0.6±2.9
FH crosscourt36%−0.2+1.2−1.9−1.0±4.3
FH down the line14%−1.8±0.0−1.0−2.7±4.2

Lean FH through the middle: +0.4±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (77 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH through the middle39%−2.9−0.1+0.9−2.1±2.5
BH crosscourt35%+1.0+2.4−0.1+3.3±3.3
BH down the line22%−0.2+0.6−0.1+0.3±4.9
FH inside-out5%+1.0+0.5−1.0+0.5±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.9±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (153 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Alex Michelsen

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+5.2±3.7+1.2+4.0
BH to their backhand · rally+4.9±4.2+2.3+2.6
FH to the middle · return+4.2±4.0+0.7+3.5
BH to the middle · rally+3.5±3.3+1.5+2.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.3±4.9+3.4−0.2
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.2±4.6+2.4+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−6.7±5.1−0.9−5.8
FH to their backhand · return +1−2.9±6.3−1.7−1.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.8±5.4−2.0−0.9
FH to their backhand · return−2.4±5.9−0.2−2.2
FH to their backhand · rally−1.1±4.9−1.4+0.3

Rinky Hijikata

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return+6.6±3.9+3.2+3.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1+5.8±5.8+5.2+0.6
FH to the middle · serve +1+5.6±4.1+3.8+1.8
BH slice to their backhand · rally+4.8±3.6+2.6+2.3
BH to the middle · return+4.5±3.7+4.0+0.5
FH to their forehand · rally+3.4±5.1+2.4+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1−6.8±6.5−5.4−1.4
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.5±6.4−2.5±0.0
BH to their backhand · return +1−1.9±5.5+0.3−2.3
FH to the middle · rally−1.5±3.8−0.5−0.9
BH to their forehand · return−1.1±6.6+2.2−3.2

Against Rinky Hijikata-like opponents

Alex Michelsen vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–64.0%38.0%
Players most similar to Rinky Hijikata1 67.7%36.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Karen Khachanov, Marcos Giron, James Duckworth, Alexander Shevchenko, Laslo Djere, Alexandre Muller, Jordan Thompson, Fabio Fognini, Dominic Thiem, Gregoire Barrere. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.