RallyIQ

Game plan

Alexander Shevchenko v Cristian Garin

Every number combines what Alexander Shevchenko does well with what Cristian Garin allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Alexander Shevchenko wins, best of 3 29%90%: 9%–59% · best of 5: 25%
Serve points won 53.3% / 57.4% Alexander / Cristian · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 28%serve 53.2% / 57.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Alexander Shevchenko's record against Cristian Garin's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.3 on serve, +3.6 on return vs expectation (177 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerAlexanderCristian
Direction choice+0.04 ±0.10
better than 68%
−0.02 ±0.12
better than 51%
Shot selection−0.13 ±0.20
better than 35%
+0.48 ±0.19
better than 90%
Execution−0.49 ±0.62
better than 45%
−0.81 ±0.50
better than 32%
Points left on the table2.49 ±0.17
lower than 61%
2.40 ±0.21
lower than 73%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Alexander Shevchenko −0.08, Cristian Garin +0.85. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Alexander Shevchenko serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlexander winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide52%65%70%62.3%±6.647% ▼
Body8%59%64%58.8%±13.20% ▼
T40%66%74%64.5%±7.153% ▲

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.2±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlexander winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide49%62%74%63.9%±7.062% ▲
Body8%60%61%57.8%±14.00% ▼
T44%61%71%59.6%±7.838% ▼

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.1±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Cristian Garin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCristian winsv AlexanderMatchupOptimal
Wide37%66%73%66.5%±7.034% ▼
Body11%56%71%64.1%±13.10% ▼
T53%75%79%79.4%±5.666% ▲

Optimal v Alexander Shevchenko: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCristian winsv AlexanderMatchupOptimal
Wide62%65%73%65.9%±6.549% ▼
Body9%62%63%62.8%±14.59%
T29%69%76%74.0%±7.142% ▲

Optimal v Alexander Shevchenko: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Alexander Shevchenko returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3+3.5+0.3+8.1±2.6
FH crosscourt24%+5.5+1.7+4.1+11.4±4.4
FH down the line11%+1.7+0.6−1.1+1.2±4.4
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.9+0.7−4.4±2.3
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3−0.4+1.3−3.5±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.5±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (245 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH through the middle36%+6.4+2.5+2.6+11.5±2.4
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+1.3+1.5+11.6±3.3
BH slice through the middle17%−4.2−0.2+1.3−3.2±2.5
BH slice crosscourt10%+0.5−1.2−1.3−2.0±3.0
BH down the line7%+4.2−0.6+0.6+4.3±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.0±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (298 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle55%−3.5−0.1+1.0−2.6±2.6
FH crosscourt38%−0.2−0.1−0.1−0.4±4.3
FH down the line7%−1.8−2.8+3.5−1.1±3.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.2±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (74 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH through the middle52%−2.9+1.8+1.1±0.0±2.2
BH crosscourt37%+1.0−1.6+1.2+0.6±3.2
BH down the line11%−0.2+1.0−4.1−3.4±4.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +0.8±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (238 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Cristian Garin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3+0.7+1.4+6.4±2.6
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−0.2+3.1+8.4±4.3
FH down the line13%+1.7−2.1+0.7+0.3±4.5
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+0.1−0.2−4.3±2.2
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3−0.2+0.2−4.3±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.9±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (416 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
BH through the middle54%+6.4+1.5+2.5+10.5±2.3
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.6+1.8+9.1±3.3
BH down the line10%+4.2−3.0+4.1+5.4±4.6
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2+0.4+1.7−2.1±2.5
BH slice crosscourt1%+0.5−1.3−1.1−1.8±2.5

Lean BH through the middle: +1.9±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (486 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
FH through the middle54%−3.5+1.2−0.8−3.1±2.9
FH crosscourt33%−0.2−0.9+2.2+1.1±4.4
FH down the line14%−1.8+2.0−0.3−0.1±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.4±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (95 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexanderValue
BH through the middle43%−2.9+0.3+0.9−1.7±2.2
BH crosscourt36%+1.0+1.2+2.9+5.1±2.9
BH down the line8%−0.2+3.1+4.3+7.2±5.0
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.7−0.8−2.9±2.4
FH inside-out3%+1.0−2.0−0.3−1.3±3.4

Lean BH down the line: +5.7±4.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (446 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Alexander Shevchenko

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+6.6±6.0+4.4+2.2
BH to their backhand · return+4.7±3.8+1.3+3.5
BH to the middle · return+3.1±2.7+0.9+2.3
BH to their backhand · return +1+2.6±4.2+1.4+1.2
FH to the middle · return +1+2.6±3.8+2.1+0.5
BH to the middle · serve +1+2.3±3.4+2.7−0.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−7.6±3.5−6.4−1.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1−7.3±6.8−4.7−2.7
BH to their forehand · return +1−3.7±6.9−1.8−1.8
FH to the middle · serve +1−3.5±3.4−1.4−2.1
BH to their backhand · rally−2.6±2.7−0.6−2.1

Cristian Garin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+6.6±6.1+0.7+5.9
BH to the middle · return+4.7±2.7+1.9+2.8
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.4±4.1+1.2+2.2
FH to the middle · return+3.4±3.0+3.2+0.2
FH to their backhand · rally+3.1±3.5−0.4+3.6
FH to the middle · return +1+2.5±3.8+1.1+1.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−4.1±5.2−3.9−0.2
BH to their backhand · serve +1−3.3±4.1−7.1+3.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.9±4.2−1.4−1.5
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.9±5.5+0.4−3.3
BH to the middle · rally−2.8±2.5−2.1−0.7

Against Cristian Garin-like opponents

Alexander Shevchenko vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–55.7%32.0%
Players most similar to Cristian Garin1 55.2%33.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jannik Sinner, Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Juncheng Shang, Thiago Monteiro, Daniel Elahi Galan, Federico Delbonis, Egor Gerasimov, Pablo Cuevas, Philipp Kohlschreiber. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.