RallyIQ

Game plan

Cristian Garin v Cameron Norrie

Every number combines what Cristian Garin does well with what Cameron Norrie allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Cristian Garin wins, best of 3 49%90%: 25%–74% · best of 5: 49%
Serve points won 62.4% / 62.6% Cristian / Cameron · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 52%serve 62.3% / 62.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Cristian Garin's record against Cameron Norrie's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +4.7 on serve, −6.9 on return vs expectation (190 points); head-to-head: −2.5 on serve, −4.3 on return vs expectation (194 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerCristianCameron
Direction choice−0.02 ±0.12
better than 51%
−0.04 ±0.08
better than 46%
Shot selection+0.48 ±0.19
better than 90%
+0.49 ±0.17
better than 92%
Execution−0.81 ±0.50
better than 32%
+0.02 ±0.39
better than 69%
Points left on the table2.40 ±0.21
lower than 73%
2.83 ±0.14
lower than 28%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Cristian Garin +0.56, Cameron Norrie +0.95. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Cristian Garin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCristian winsv CameronMatchupOptimal
Wide37%66%75%67.8%±5.434% ▼
Body11%56%62%54.5%±10.30% ▼
T53%75%79%79.0%±4.466% ▲

Optimal v Cameron Norrie: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCristian winsv CameronMatchupOptimal
Wide62%65%79%72.3%±4.949% ▼
Body9%62%63%62.1%±10.99%
T29%69%69%65.7%±6.542% ▲

Optimal v Cameron Norrie: +0.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Cameron Norrie serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCameron winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide37%70%70%66.9%±5.751% ▲
Body9%63%64%63.2%±10.61% ▼
T53%67%74%65.9%±5.248% ▼

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCameron winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide62%71%74%72.6%±4.857% ▼
Body8%64%61%61.7%±11.60% ▼
T30%79%71%77.7%±5.443% ▲

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.9±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +4.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Cristian Garin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CameronValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3+0.7±0.0+5.0±2.3
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−0.2+2.8+8.2±4.0
FH down the line13%+1.7−2.1−1.9−2.3±4.5
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+0.1−1.2−5.3±2.2
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3−0.2+1.9−2.6±2.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.8±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (416 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CameronValue
BH through the middle54%+6.4+1.5+2.7+10.6±1.8
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.6+4.3+11.5±3.0
BH down the line10%+4.2−3.0−1.5−0.3±4.3
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2+0.4+2.2−1.6±2.3
BH slice crosscourt1%+0.5−1.3+2.1+1.4±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.8±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (486 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CameronValue
FH through the middle54%−3.5+1.2−0.5−2.8±2.5
FH crosscourt33%−0.2−0.9+1.5+0.3±4.1
FH down the line14%−1.8+2.0−1.4−1.2±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.9±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (95 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CameronValue
BH through the middle43%−2.9+0.3+1.5−1.0±1.9
BH crosscourt36%+1.0+1.2±0.0+2.2±2.7
BH down the line8%−0.2+3.1+0.9+3.9±4.8
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.7−0.5−2.6±2.1
FH inside-out3%+1.0−2.0−1.4−2.4±3.3

Lean BH down the line: +3.4±4.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (446 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Cameron Norrie returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3−0.2+0.3+4.4±2.3
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+2.4−1.1+6.8±4.1
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2−0.8+0.7−4.3±2.3
FH down the line12%+1.7−2.2+4.1+3.6±4.5
FH slice crosscourt6%−4.3+0.3+1.5−2.6±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (709 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4+0.7+2.6+9.7±1.9
BH crosscourt35%+8.8−0.8+0.6+8.6±3.1
BH down the line8%+4.2−0.4+1.5+5.3±4.3
BH slice through the middle5%−4.2+0.8+1.3−2.1±2.5
BH slice down the line2%−8.4−0.4−1.3−10.1±3.2

Lean BH through the middle: +1.9±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (862 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5−0.5+1.0−3.0±2.5
FH crosscourt43%−0.2+0.8+3.5+4.1±4.2
FH down the line10%−1.8−2.7−0.1−4.5±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.1±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (263 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH crosscourt44%+1.0−0.7−4.1−3.8±3.0
BH through the middle31%−2.9+1.5+1.1−0.3±2.2
FH inside-in10%+0.6−0.1+3.5+4.0±4.3
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.8+1.0−1.1±2.2
BH down the line4%−0.2−0.9+1.2±0.0±4.8

Lean FH inside-in: +5.5±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (490 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Cristian Garin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+4.4±1.4+1.1+3.3
BH to their forehand · return+2.6±3.5±0.0+2.7
BH to the middle · return +1+2.6±2.1+1.5+1.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.5±2.7−1.4+3.9
FH to the middle · return +1+2.5±2.4+0.9+1.7
FH to their backhand · rally+2.5±1.7+0.3+2.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1−3.8±2.8−3.2−0.6
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.7±2.4−4.7+1.0
BH slice to the middle · rally−2.2±2.2−1.7−0.5
FH to their forehand · return−1.9±4.0+0.6−2.5
BH to their backhand · return +1−1.8±2.8−0.6−1.2

Cameron Norrie

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+5.7±1.6+2.9+2.8
BH to their backhand · return +1+4.0±3.0+2.3+1.7
BH to the middle · return +1+2.7±2.0+0.9+1.9
FH to their forehand · rally+2.7±2.0+0.9+1.8
FH to the middle · rally+2.5±1.5+1.2+1.4
BH to their forehand · rally+2.5±2.6+1.6+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−3.8±4.1−5.5+1.7
BH slice to their backhand · rally−1.7±2.3−1.1−0.6
BH to the middle · serve +1−1.3±2.2−2.0+0.7
BH to their forehand · serve +1−1.1±4.1+0.9−2.0
FH to the middle · return−0.9±1.7−0.9−0.1

Against Cameron Norrie-like opponents

Cristian Garin vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.5%36.6%
Players most similar to Cameron Norrie2 63.3%31.5%
Cameron Norrie (charted head-to-head)1 59.8%33.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jannik Sinner, Gael Monfils, Thiago Monteiro, Daniel Elahi Galan, Yoshihito Nishioka, Albert Ramos, Federico Delbonis, Fernando Verdasco, Pablo Cuevas. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head