RallyIQ

Game plan

Daniel Elahi Galan v Casper Ruud

Every number combines what Daniel Elahi Galan does well with what Casper Ruud allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Daniel Elahi Galan wins, best of 3 13%90%: 4%–33% · best of 5: 8%
Serve points won 59.6% / 68.5% Daniel / Casper · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 15%serve 59.7% / 68.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Daniel Elahi Galan's record against Casper Ruud's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (head-to-head: −4.4 on serve, −11.0 on return vs expectation (95 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerDanielCasper
Direction choice−0.09 ±0.10
better than 32%
−0.03 ±0.05
better than 49%
Shot selection+0.44 ±0.13
better than 89%
−0.02 ±0.09
better than 51%
Execution−0.67 ±0.46
better than 38%
+0.87 ±0.19
better than 93%
Points left on the table2.56 ±0.23
lower than 54%
2.68 ±0.08
lower than 40%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Daniel Elahi Galan −0.24, Casper Ruud +1.79. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Daniel Elahi Galan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDaniel winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide39%68%73%67.9%±5.552% ▲
Body11%56%63%55.4%±9.40% ▼
T50%71%74%69.6%±5.248% ▼

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDaniel winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide54%70%71%67.8%±5.552% ▼
Body11%58%62%56.7%±9.80% ▼
T35%64%73%64.8%±6.248% ▲

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Casper Ruud serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCasper winsv DanielMatchupOptimal
Wide48%75%75%77.5%±4.961% ▲
Body9%64%69%69.4%±8.80% ▼
T43%78%75%77.2%±4.739% ▼

Optimal v Daniel Elahi Galan: +0.9±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCasper winsv DanielMatchupOptimal
Wide52%71%70%68.2%±5.746% ▼
Body7%60%61%58.4%±11.00% ▼
T41%72%72%71.6%±6.254% ▲

Optimal v Daniel Elahi Galan: +0.7±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Daniel Elahi Galan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3+0.1+0.8+5.1±2.2
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−2.1+2.7+6.1±3.6
FH down the line17%+1.7−0.9−3.0−2.2±3.6
FH slice through the middle3%−4.2−1.4−1.0−6.6±1.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.3±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (219 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH through the middle37%+6.4−0.8+0.7+6.2±2.0
BH crosscourt34%+8.8+1.0−0.3+9.5±2.7
BH down the line14%+4.2−0.9−0.4+2.9±3.9
BH slice through the middle6%−4.2−0.8−1.0−6.0±1.9
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5±0.0−1.1−0.6±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (286 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5−0.5+0.4−3.5±2.3
FH crosscourt34%−0.2−2.6−4.0−6.8±3.6
FH down the line14%−1.8−0.9−1.8−4.5±3.3

Lean FH through the middle: +1.2±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (50 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH crosscourt47%+1.0−1.0−1.0−0.9±2.4
BH through the middle45%−2.9−0.6±0.0−3.5±1.9
BH down the line8%−0.2−0.6+3.4+2.6±3.8

Lean BH down the line: +4.4±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (200 returns charted)

Casper Ruud returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DanielValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3+0.7−2.9+2.1±2.1
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2−0.7−2.5−7.4±1.8
FH down the line13%+1.7+1.2+2.0+4.8±3.8
FH crosscourt11%+5.5−1.3−0.9+3.3±3.9
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+1.5−0.2−3.0±2.5

Lean FH down the line: +5.4±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (2447 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DanielValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+1.2−0.2+7.4±1.9
BH crosscourt31%+8.8+2.4+0.4+11.6±2.6
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.7−2.1−8.1±2.1
BH down the line8%+4.2+3.2+0.2+7.7±4.1
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.7−3.2−3.4±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.3±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (3085 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DanielValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+1.8−0.9−2.6±2.4
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+1.1+0.8+1.7±4.0
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.8−0.6−1.6±4.6
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7+0.2±0.0−12.5±1.7
BH through the middle1%+0.1+0.3+0.6+1.0±1.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.4±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (709 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DanielValue
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4−0.7+0.7±2.4
BH through the middle25%−2.9−1.2+0.6−3.4±1.9
FH through the middle17%−2.9−0.2−0.9−3.9±2.0
FH inside-in10%+0.6+2.1+0.8+3.4±3.9
FH inside-out9%+1.0−1.6−0.6−1.3±3.4
BH down the line6%−0.2−0.7+5.3+4.5±4.7

Lean BH down the line: +5.4±4.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (2232 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Daniel Elahi Galan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return+2.0±1.9+0.6+1.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.5±2.5+0.3+1.2
FH to the middle · return +1+1.2±2.2+2.0−0.8
FH to their forehand · rally+0.9±1.8+0.9±0.0
FH to the middle · serve +1+0.9±2.0+1.0−0.1
FH to their forehand · return +1+0.8±3.2−0.2+1.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−6.5±3.3−4.1−2.3
FH to their backhand · return +1−3.2±3.2−1.2−2.0
BH to the middle · serve +1−2.5±2.1−2.0−0.5
FH to their forehand · return−2.2±3.5−3.1+0.8
BH to the middle · return +1−1.7±2.0−1.7±0.0

Casper Ruud

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+6.4±3.7+2.6+3.8
FH to their backhand · rally+4.5±1.7+1.5+3.1
FH to their forehand · rally+4.5±1.9+2.3+2.2
FH to their forehand · serve +1+4.3±2.7+2.6+1.7
BH to their forehand · return +1+4.0±4.2+2.5+1.5
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.8±2.5+2.1+1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return−2.4±1.8−0.1−2.3
FH to the middle · return +1−1.4±2.2−0.2−1.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally−0.8±2.0+0.1−0.9
FH to their forehand · return+0.3±3.5+0.5−0.2
FH to their backhand · return+0.4±3.0−0.7+1.1

Against Casper Ruud-like opponents

Daniel Elahi Galan vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.6%34.6%
Casper Ruud (charted head-to-head)1 55.3%20.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Tommy Paul, Felix Auger Aliassime, Marcos Giron, Roberto Bautista Agut, Pablo Carreno Busta, Dusan Lajovic, Dominic Thiem, Radu Albot, Tommy Robredo. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head