RallyIQ

Game plan

Dominic Thiem v Steve Johnson

Every number combines what Dominic Thiem does well with what Steve Johnson allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Dominic Thiem wins, best of 3 74%90%: 53%–89% · best of 5: 79%
Serve points won 67.5% / 62.3% Dominic / Steve · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 86%serve 69.0% / 60.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Dominic Thiem's record against Steve Johnson's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −3.8 on serve, −5.2 on return vs expectation (1506 points); head-to-head: −3.5 on serve, −6.7 on return vs expectation (214 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerDominicSteve
Direction choice+0.12 ±0.03
better than 83%
+0.20 ±0.08
better than 95%
Shot selection−0.28 ±0.08
better than 25%
−1.01 ±0.24
better than 2%
Execution+0.04 ±0.20
better than 71%
−1.39 ±0.57
better than 13%
Points left on the table2.48 ±0.05
lower than 63%
2.71 ±0.16
lower than 39%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Dominic Thiem serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDominic winsv SteveMatchupOptimal
Wide47%73%77%77.8%±4.360% ▲
Body5%61%72%70.1%±8.60% ▼
T48%74%79%78.5%±4.240% ▼

Optimal v Steve Johnson: +0.4±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDominic winsv SteveMatchupOptimal
Wide52%71%79%78.0%±4.547% ▼
Body7%64%64%64.5%±9.20% ▼
T40%71%82%81.3%±4.353% ▲

Optimal v Steve Johnson: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Steve Johnson serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowSteve winsv DominicMatchupOptimal
Wide45%70%73%69.6%±4.658% ▲
Body10%66%63%65.6%±8.60% ▼
T45%77%73%75.1%±5.042% ▼

Optimal v Dominic Thiem: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowSteve winsv DominicMatchupOptimal
Wide56%75%72%73.8%±4.653% ▼
Body11%67%65%69.4%±8.80% ▼
T34%70%72%70.5%±5.547% ▲

Optimal v Dominic Thiem: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Dominic Thiem returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SteveValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3−1.4+1.5+4.3±1.9
FH down the line22%+1.7−1.0+1.9+2.5±3.5
FH crosscourt17%+5.5−1.0+3.9+8.4±3.6
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.0+1.1−4.1±2.1
FH slice down the line2%−4.3−3.2+0.8−6.7±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (2907 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SteveValue
BH through the middle34%+6.4−1.0−1.0+4.4±1.9
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−2.3+0.5−6.0±2.0
BH crosscourt18%+8.8−1.5−2.5+4.8±2.7
BH slice crosscourt13%+0.5−2.3−0.6−2.4±2.5
BH down the line12%+4.2−4.1−2.3−2.2±3.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.7±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (3946 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SteveValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5−0.5−0.1−4.1±2.4
FH crosscourt29%−0.2+0.8+3.5+4.1±3.8
FH down the line19%−1.8−0.8+1.7−0.8±4.4
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−0.5+1.2−11.9±1.7
FH slice down the line1%−9.4−0.3±0.0−9.7±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.4±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (802 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv SteveValue
BH through the middle32%−2.9−1.0−1.7−5.5±1.7
BH crosscourt27%+1.0+1.2−1.4+0.8±2.3
FH through the middle13%−2.9+0.9−0.1−2.1±2.1
FH inside-out9%+1.0+0.2+1.7+2.9±3.3
BH down the line8%−0.2−5.1−3.0−8.3±4.5
FH inside-in4%+0.6+0.8+3.5+4.9±4.2

Lean FH inside-in: +8.0±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (2564 returns charted)

Steve Johnson returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DominicValue
FH through the middle36%+4.3−0.8−1.2+2.3±2.2
FH crosscourt20%+5.5−3.1−1.6+0.8±3.5
FH down the line19%+1.7−1.6−1.3−1.3±3.6
FH slice through the middle15%−4.2+0.7−1.6−5.1±2.1
FH slice down the line6%−4.3+1.7+1.2−1.3±3.0

Lean FH through the middle: +2.6±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (318 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DominicValue
BH slice through the middle28%−4.2+1.2−1.9−4.9±2.0
BH slice crosscourt25%+0.5+3.0−1.4+2.1±2.5
BH through the middle23%+6.4−2.6−1.1+2.7±2.1
BH crosscourt12%+8.8−1.9+0.8+7.7±2.7
BH down the line7%+4.2+0.1−4.4−0.1±3.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.4±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (339 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DominicValue
FH through the middle39%−3.5+1.5−0.9−2.9±2.2
FH crosscourt28%−0.2−1.9−3.1−5.2±3.5
FH down the line24%−1.8+0.5−0.8−2.1±3.6
FH slice through the middle10%−12.7+0.1+0.7−11.8±1.8

Lean FH down the line: +2.1±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (72 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DominicValue
BH slice crosscourt26%−4.0+0.1−4.1−8.0±2.5
BH through the middle15%−2.9−1.7±0.0−4.7±1.9
BH slice through the middle14%−11.3−0.3−2.7−14.3±2.4
FH through the middle11%−2.9+0.8−0.9−2.9±1.8
BH crosscourt10%+1.0−3.2±0.0−2.1±2.4
BH down the line10%−0.2+1.1−0.4+0.5±3.9

Lean BH down the line: +6.0±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (247 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Dominic Thiem

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+7.9±7.5+0.6+7.3
FH to their forehand · return+7.3±4.8±0.0+7.2
BH to their forehand · rally+3.5±4.6+0.3+3.3
FH to their backhand · return+2.9±3.9−0.9+3.8
BH to their forehand · return +1+2.9±6.0+1.2+1.7
BH to their backhand · return +1+1.5±3.5+0.9+0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return−10.9±5.1−4.4−6.5
FH to their backhand · rally−5.1±2.7+0.2−5.4
BH to their backhand · rally−4.8±2.4+0.6−5.5
FH to their backhand · return +1−4.3±4.1+0.7−5.1
FH to the middle · return +1−2.8±3.0−1.5−1.3

Steve Johnson

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.7±3.2+4.0−0.3
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1+2.2±3.7+2.4−0.2
FH to their forehand · return +1+1.7±4.5+1.5+0.3
BH slice to their backhand · return+0.5±3.1+2.6−2.1
BH slice to the middle · return +1+0.4±3.1+1.3−0.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1−0.1±3.6−1.1+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · rally−6.3±4.6−0.7−5.6
BH to their forehand · return−4.9±4.8−0.7−4.2
FH to their forehand · return−4.7±4.8−1.9−2.7
BH slice to their backhand · rally−4.5±2.3−0.1−4.4
FH to their backhand · rally−4.2±2.7−2.6−1.6

Against Steve Johnson-like opponents

Dominic Thiem vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–64.6%36.3%
Players most similar to Steve Johnson11 62.9%27.2%
Steve Johnson (charted head-to-head)1 65.8%29.9%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Matteo Berrettini, Grigor Dimitrov, Alexei Popyrin, Milos Raonic, Jeremy Chardy, Malek Jaziri, Tim Van Rijthoven, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Fernando Gonzalez. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head