Game plan

Emil Ruusuvuori v Alejandro Davidovich Fokina

Every number combines what Emil Ruusuvuori does well with what Alejandro Davidovich Fokina allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Emil Ruusuvuori wins, best of 3 53%90%: 24%–80% · best of 5: 54%

Serve points won 63.1% / 62.4% Emil / Alejandro · tour 65.7%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 50%serve 62.6% / 62.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Emil Ruusuvuori's record against Alejandro Davidovich Fokina's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +4.8 on serve, +2.0 on return vs expectation (349 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Emil	Alejandro
Direction choice	−0.16 ±0.06 better than 19%	−0.06 ±0.06 better than 42%
Shot selection	+0.32 ±0.10 better than 81%	−0.04 ±0.10 better than 48%
Execution	−0.31 ±0.37 better than 52%	−0.44 ±0.30 better than 47%
Points left on the table	2.31 ±0.11 lower than 83%	2.43 ±0.11 lower than 70%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Emil Ruusuvuori −0.05, Alejandro Davidovich Fokina −0.85. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Emil Ruusuvuori serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Emil wins	v Alejandro	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	35%	68%	71%	65.1%±4.9	34%
Body	23%	62%	59%	58.2%±7.5	10% ▼
T	43%	72%	74%	71.6%±4.6	56% ▲

Optimal v Alejandro Davidovich Fokina: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Emil wins	v Alejandro	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	39%	70%	71%	67.9%±4.9	52% ▲
Body	16%	66%	61%	64.7%±8.4	16%
T	45%	69%	68%	64.4%±5.0	32% ▼

Optimal v Alejandro Davidovich Fokina: +0.2±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Alejandro Davidovich Fokina serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Alejandro wins	v Emil	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	47%	69%	71%	66.8%±4.5	47%
Body	24%	59%	61%	56.7%±7.9	11% ▼
T	29%	66%	73%	63.6%±5.4	42% ▲

Optimal v Emil Ruusuvuori: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Alejandro wins	v Emil	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	35%	62%	72%	61.3%±5.1	35%
Body	22%	63%	62%	62.0%±8.8	9% ▼
T	43%	65%	71%	64.0%±5.0	56% ▲

Optimal v Emil Ruusuvuori: +0.3±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Emil Ruusuvuori returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Alejandro	Value
FH through the middle	55%	+4.3	+1.1	+1.1	+6.5±1.7
FH down the line	23%	+1.7	−1.6	−0.5	−0.5±3.6
FH crosscourt	18%	+5.5	−0.8	−1.4	+3.3±3.5
FH slice through the middle	2%	−4.2	−1.5	−1.7	−7.5±2.1
FH slice down the line	1%	−4.3	−2.8	−0.6	−7.7±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +2.8±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (703 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Alejandro	Value
BH through the middle	53%	+6.4	−0.1	+1.6	+8.0±1.7
BH crosscourt	31%	+8.8	−2.8	+0.5	+6.4±2.5
BH down the line	13%	+4.2	−4.6	+0.3	−0.1±4.2
BH slice through the middle	2%	−4.2	−0.8	−3.2	−8.1±2.3
BH slice down the line	1%	−8.4	−1.6	−2.3	−12.3±2.8

Lean BH through the middle: +2.1±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (708 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Alejandro	Value
FH through the middle	57%	−3.5	+2.7	−1.1	−1.9±2.3
FH crosscourt	25%	−0.2	+0.9	+1.8	+2.5±3.9
FH down the line	18%	−1.8	−2.6	+1.6	−2.9±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.5±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (207 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Alejandro	Value
BH through the middle	49%	−2.9	−0.2	−0.8	−3.9±1.9
BH crosscourt	41%	+1.0	−1.4	−0.1	−0.5±2.7
BH down the line	9%	−0.2	±0.0	+0.2	+0.1±4.9
FH through the middle	1%	−2.9	+0.4	−1.1	−3.6±1.5

Lean BH down the line: +2.2±4.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (481 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Alejandro Davidovich Fokina returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Emil	Value
FH through the middle	43%	+4.3	+0.4	+0.1	+4.8±1.8
FH down the line	20%	+1.7	−2.5	−2.0	−2.8±3.6
FH crosscourt	15%	+5.5	+0.4	−2.1	+3.8±3.8
FH slice through the middle	15%	−4.2	−0.3	+0.3	−4.3±2.2
FH slice down the line	4%	−4.3	−0.2	+0.7	−3.7±2.9

Lean FH through the middle: +3.6±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1084 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Emil	Value
BH through the middle	42%	+6.4	+2.6	+1.3	+10.2±1.8
BH crosscourt	24%	+8.8	+2.0	−0.5	+10.3±2.8
BH slice through the middle	15%	−4.2	−2.1	+0.5	−5.8±2.3
BH down the line	11%	+4.2	−0.8	−1.9	+1.5±4.3
BH slice crosscourt	5%	+0.5	−3.0	+1.2	−1.3±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.6±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (962 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Emil	Value
FH through the middle	44%	−3.5	−0.8	−1.3	−5.6±2.6
FH down the line	27%	−1.8	+1.1	−1.3	−2.0±4.7
FH crosscourt	25%	−0.2	−5.7	−2.8	−8.8±4.4
FH slice through the middle	4%	−12.7	−0.9	±0.0	−13.6±1.2

Lean FH down the line: +3.7±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (220 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Emil	Value
BH through the middle	42%	−2.9	+0.1	+0.6	−2.2±1.8
BH crosscourt	36%	+1.0	+0.1	+2.3	+3.5±2.5
BH down the line	18%	−0.2	−3.4	−3.8	−7.4±4.8
BH slice through the middle	2%	−11.3	+0.1	+1.1	−10.1±2.1
FH inside-out	1%	+1.0	+0.4	−1.3	+0.1±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.6±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (669 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Emil Ruusuvuori

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1	+4.6±4.9	+0.8	+3.8
FH slice to the middle · rally	+3.1±3.3	+1.6	+1.5
FH to the middle · return +1	+3.1±3.8	+0.4	+2.7
BH to the middle · return	+2.4±3.0	+0.9	+1.6
FH to the middle · return	+2.2±3.2	+0.8	+1.4
FH to their forehand · rally	+1.8±4.3	+1.3	+0.5

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally	−9.6±6.8	−4.1	−5.5
BH to their forehand · serve +1	−5.4±6.4	−2.8	−2.6
BH to their forehand · return	−4.2±6.2	−3.9	−0.3
BH to their forehand · rally	−4.2±5.4	−1.7	−2.5
BH volley to their forehand · rally	−3.7±8.1	−3.0	−0.7

Alejandro Davidovich Fokina

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally	+9.9±8.0	+6.5	+3.4
FH to the middle · return +1	+6.8±3.6	+4.4	+2.4
BH to the middle · return	+3.9±3.0	+1.5	+2.4
BH slice to their backhand · return +1	+1.6±3.5	+0.3	+1.3
BH to the middle · serve +1	+1.5±3.5	−0.2	+1.7
BH slice to their backhand · rally	+1.4±3.3	−1.0	+2.5

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · return	−9.8±5.9	−5.9	−3.9
FH to the middle · rally	−4.7±3.3	−4.4	−0.2
BH to their backhand · return +1	−4.5±4.5	−1.2	−3.3
BH slice to their forehand · rally	−4.0±4.8	−2.3	−1.7
FH to their forehand · serve +1	−3.9±5.0	−6.1	+2.2

Against Alejandro Davidovich Fokina-like opponents

Emil Ruusuvuori v	Matches	Serve pts won	Return pts won
All charted opponents	–	62.2%	36.9%
Players most similar to Alejandro Davidovich Fokina	2	62.7%	37.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Carlos Alcaraz, Fabian Marozsan, Tommy Paul, Alexander Shevchenko, Laslo Djere, Alexandre Muller, Holger Rune, Fabio Fognini, Kei Nishikori, Lukas Rosol. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.