RallyIQ

Game plan

Federico Delbonis v Cristian Garin

Every number combines what Federico Delbonis does well with what Cristian Garin allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Federico Delbonis wins, best of 3 44%90%: 20%–70% · best of 5: 42%
Serve points won 58.7% / 59.9% Federico / Cristian · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 44%serve 58.7% / 59.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Federico Delbonis's record against Cristian Garin's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerFedericoCristian
Direction choice−0.30 ±0.16
better than 5%
−0.02 ±0.12
better than 51%
Shot selection+0.03 ±0.22
better than 56%
+0.48 ±0.19
better than 90%
Execution−1.01 ±0.49
better than 25%
−0.81 ±0.50
better than 32%
Points left on the table2.96 ±0.24
lower than 22%
2.40 ±0.21
lower than 73%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Federico Delbonis serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFederico winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide32%69%70%66.1%±7.545% ▲
Body19%63%64%63.3%±11.16% ▼
T49%68%74%66.0%±6.549%

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFederico winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide57%70%74%71.3%±6.058%
Body15%59%61%57.1%±12.52% ▼
T27%71%71%69.5%±8.140% ▲

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.6±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Cristian Garin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCristian winsv FedericoMatchupOptimal
Wide37%66%72%65.2%±6.734% ▼
Body11%56%63%55.5%±12.30% ▼
T53%75%79%79.8%±5.866% ▲

Optimal v Federico Delbonis: +1.1±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +7.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCristian winsv FedericoMatchupOptimal
Wide62%65%78%71.1%±6.958% ▼
Body9%62%56%55.3%±12.10% ▼
T29%69%74%71.7%±7.042% ▲

Optimal v Federico Delbonis: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Federico Delbonis returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3−1.0+0.3+3.5±2.7
FH crosscourt27%+5.5+1.5−1.1+5.9±4.4
FH down the line14%+1.7−0.5+4.1+5.3±4.5
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.5+0.7−4.0±2.3
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−0.7+1.3−3.7±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.7±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (206 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH through the middle43%+6.4−2.8+2.6+6.2±2.3
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−2.7+1.3−5.7±2.5
BH down the line17%+4.2−2.7+1.5+3.0±4.3
BH crosscourt13%+8.8−3.2+0.6+6.2±3.6
BH slice down the line7%−8.4−1.4−1.3−11.1±3.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (363 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5+0.9+1.0−1.5±2.6
FH crosscourt32%−0.2+0.7+3.5+4.0±4.3
FH down the line9%−1.8−1.4−0.1−3.3±4.0
FH slice through the middle7%−12.7−1.0±0.0−13.7±1.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (100 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH through the middle51%−2.9+0.8+1.1−1.0±2.3
BH crosscourt17%+1.0−2.1−4.1−5.2±3.2
FH through the middle12%−2.9+1.1+1.0−0.7±2.1
BH down the line11%−0.2−1.1+1.2−0.2±4.7
FH inside-in6%+0.6+0.5+3.5+4.6±3.8

Lean BH down the line: +1.4±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (171 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Cristian Garin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3+0.7−1.1+3.8±2.6
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−0.2+0.4+5.8±4.2
FH down the line13%+1.7−2.1−0.5−0.9±4.4
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+0.1−0.9−5.0±2.2
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3−0.2−0.1−4.6±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.5±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (416 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
BH through the middle54%+6.4+1.5+2.2+10.1±2.1
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.6−2.4+4.8±3.3
BH down the line10%+4.2−3.0+1.2+2.5±4.5
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2+0.4+1.3−2.6±2.5
BH slice crosscourt1%+0.5−1.3+0.9+0.1±2.3

Lean BH through the middle: +3.2±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (486 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
FH through the middle54%−3.5+1.2−1.2−3.5±2.9
FH crosscourt33%−0.2−0.9−0.2−1.4±4.4
FH down the line14%−1.8+2.0−1.7−1.5±3.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.1±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (95 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FedericoValue
BH through the middle43%−2.9+0.3+0.9−1.7±2.1
BH crosscourt36%+1.0+1.2−1.8+0.3±3.1
BH down the line8%−0.2+3.1−2.1+0.8±5.0
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.7−1.2−3.3±2.4
FH inside-out3%+1.0−2.0−1.7−2.7±2.9

Lean BH down the line: +1.7±4.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (446 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Federico Delbonis

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.6±3.6+2.3+1.3
BH to their forehand · return +1+2.4±6.9+4.3−1.8
FH to their backhand · return+1.9±4.8+0.3+1.7
BH to the middle · return +1+1.6±3.2−0.1+1.7
FH to their backhand · return +1+0.8±4.8+1.1−0.3
BH to the middle · return+0.7±2.4−1.6+2.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−6.2±3.0−4.1−2.1
BH slice to their backhand · rally−6.1±3.6−3.8−2.3
BH to their forehand · serve +1−5.6±6.8−2.9−2.7
BH to their forehand · rally−4.8±4.6−4.2−0.6
FH to their forehand · return +1−3.9±5.9−4.6+0.6

Cristian Garin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+2.6±2.3+1.9+0.8
FH to the middle · return+1.7±2.9+3.2−1.5
FH to the middle · rally+0.4±2.5+0.6−0.2
BH to the middle · return +1+0.3±3.1+1.1−0.8
FH to their backhand · return +1+0.1±4.9+0.1±0.0
BH to the middle · serve +1−0.6±3.6−3.1+2.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · rally−11.7±3.9−6.1−5.6
BH to their forehand · serve +1−5.8±6.9−7.7+1.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.1±3.9−1.4−2.7
BH slice to the middle · rally−3.3±3.3−4.1+0.8
FH to their backhand · return−3.2±4.9−3.9+0.7

Against Cristian Garin-like opponents

Federico Delbonis vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–60.8%32.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jannik Sinner, Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Juncheng Shang, Thiago Monteiro, Daniel Elahi Galan, Egor Gerasimov, Pablo Cuevas, Philipp Kohlschreiber. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.