RallyIQ

Game plan

Gabriel Diallo v Jiri Lehecka

Every number combines what Gabriel Diallo does well with what Jiri Lehecka allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Gabriel Diallo wins, best of 3 41%90%: 17%–68% · best of 5: 38%
Serve points won 65.5% / 67.4% Gabriel / Jiri · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 41%serve 65.0% / 66.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Gabriel Diallo's record against Jiri Lehecka's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +12.0 on serve, −4.3 on return vs expectation (158 points); head-to-head: −2.7 on serve, −14.4 on return vs expectation (95 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerGabrielJiri
Direction choice−0.28 ±0.06
better than 7%
−0.11 ±0.11
better than 30%
Shot selection+0.45 ±0.13
better than 89%
−0.02 ±0.14
better than 49%
Execution−2.12 ±0.74
better than 2%
−0.37 ±0.43
better than 50%
Points left on the table2.80 ±0.17
lower than 31%
2.73 ±0.18
lower than 37%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Gabriel Diallo serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGabriel winsv JiriMatchupOptimal
Wide44%74%77%78.7%±5.257% ▲
Body11%64%60%59.9%±11.70% ▼
T46%74%76%75.1%±5.943% ▼

Optimal v Jiri Lehecka: +1.1±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGabriel winsv JiriMatchupOptimal
Wide49%72%77%76.4%±5.649%
Body13%62%67%65.6%±11.60% ▼
T38%72%77%76.9%±5.851% ▲

Optimal v Jiri Lehecka: +1.1±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jiri Lehecka serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJiri winsv GabrielMatchupOptimal
Wide44%72%77%76.6%±5.957% ▲
Body12%60%60%57.4%±11.80% ▼
T45%76%77%77.6%±5.643% ▼

Optimal v Gabriel Diallo: +1.0±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJiri winsv GabrielMatchupOptimal
Wide54%73%74%74.5%±6.550% ▼
Body9%65%65%67.8%±11.20% ▼
T37%72%75%75.5%±5.950% ▲

Optimal v Gabriel Diallo: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Gabriel Diallo returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JiriValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3−0.7+1.8+5.4±2.5
FH down the line24%+1.7−0.6+1.1+2.2±4.3
FH slice through the middle14%−4.2−0.8+0.5−4.5±2.2
FH crosscourt14%+5.5−1.6+4.2+8.1±4.1
FH slice down the line7%−4.3+1.3+1.4−1.5±3.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.0±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (212 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JiriValue
BH through the middle39%+6.4−1.0+4.1+9.5±2.4
BH crosscourt29%+8.8−1.7+3.7+10.8±3.3
BH down the line15%+4.2−0.7+1.9+5.4±4.5
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.2+1.0−3.4±2.2
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−1.0+0.3−0.1±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.7±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (195 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JiriValue
FH through the middle55%−3.5−2.5+1.1−4.8±2.4
FH down the line25%−1.8+0.1−1.2−2.8±4.1
FH crosscourt20%−0.2−3.5−0.9−4.6±3.7

Lean FH through the middle: −0.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (56 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JiriValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9−4.3+2.3−4.9±2.2
BH crosscourt38%+1.0−4.4+1.6−1.8±2.9
BH down the line11%−0.2−4.7−2.8−7.7±4.6
FH through the middle4%−2.9−0.7+1.1−2.5±1.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (141 returns charted)

Jiri Lehecka returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GabrielValue
FH through the middle36%+4.3−0.8±0.0+3.4±2.6
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+1.9+1.0+8.4±4.2
FH slice through the middle19%−4.2−1.2−1.7−7.2±2.2
FH slice crosscourt10%−4.3−0.3−0.4−5.1±2.5
FH down the line10%+1.7−0.9−2.0−1.3±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.8±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (705 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GabrielValue
BH through the middle30%+6.4+1.8+0.2+8.3±2.5
BH slice through the middle24%−4.2−0.9+0.2−4.9±2.2
BH crosscourt22%+8.8+1.6±0.0+10.4±3.3
BH slice crosscourt14%+0.5−1.6+0.4−0.7±2.8
BH down the line5%+4.2+2.0−0.1+6.0±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.0±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (786 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GabrielValue
FH through the middle43%−3.5−0.8+1.9−2.3±2.9
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+1.8+0.4+2.0±4.4
FH down the line20%−1.8−1.7−1.7−5.1±4.5
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7+0.6±0.0−12.1±1.3
FH slice down the line3%−9.4+0.3+0.8−8.4±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.3±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (210 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GabrielValue
BH through the middle44%−2.9−0.5−3.2−6.5±2.2
BH crosscourt30%+1.0+1.1−1.2+1.0±3.0
FH through the middle9%−2.9+1.6+1.9+0.6±2.4
BH down the line9%−0.2+5.3−0.8+4.3±4.8
FH inside-in3%+0.6−1.7+0.4−0.8±4.2

Lean BH down the line: +6.9±4.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (626 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Gabriel Diallo

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1+2.7±2.3+2.2+0.5
BH to their backhand · rally+1.0±2.1+1.0−0.1
FH to their forehand · return +1+0.6±3.8−0.7+1.3
FH to the middle · return +1+0.2±2.5−0.3+0.5
BH to their backhand · return +1−0.3±3.1+0.5−0.8
BH to the middle · return−0.4±1.8−3.9+3.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return−4.3±4.3−3.8−0.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1−4.0±3.2−2.1−1.9
FH to their backhand · rally−3.3±2.6−3.4+0.1
FH to the middle · serve +1−3.0±2.3−1.4−1.6
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.9±2.9−0.1−2.8

Jiri Lehecka

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.0±3.1+0.5+2.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally+2.0±2.5+1.2+0.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.5±3.0+0.9+0.6
FH to their forehand · return+1.5±4.1+0.6+0.9
BH to their backhand · return+0.1±2.7+0.7−0.6
FH to the middle · return±0.0±2.2−0.9+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · rally−3.9±2.2−1.4−2.5
BH to their forehand · rally−3.8±3.9−4.4+0.5
BH to the middle · serve +1−2.8±2.3−1.5−1.2
FH to the middle · serve +1−2.4±2.3−1.0−1.4
BH to the middle · return−2.1±1.9−0.2−1.9

Against Jiri Lehecka-like opponents

Gabriel Diallo vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–62.8%31.8%
Players most similar to Jiri Lehecka1 75.3%32.1%
Jiri Lehecka (charted head-to-head)1 62.0%20.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Ben Shelton, Arthur Rinderknech, Zhizhen Zhang, Alexander Shevchenko, Zizou Bergs, Jan Lennard Struff, Luca Nardi, Fabio Fognini, Gregoire Barrere. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head