RallyIQ

Game plan

Grigor Dimitrov v Malek Jaziri

Every number combines what Grigor Dimitrov does well with what Malek Jaziri allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Grigor Dimitrov wins, best of 3 94%90%: 75%–99% · best of 5: 97%
Serve points won 70.4% / 58.0% Grigor / Malek · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 96%serve 70.8% / 56.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Grigor Dimitrov's record against Malek Jaziri's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.2 on serve, −1.5 on return vs expectation (1889 points); head-to-head: −5.8 on serve, −13.4 on return vs expectation (213 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerGrigorMalek
Direction choice−0.07 ±0.05
better than 38%
−0.02 ±0.18
better than 50%
Shot selection−0.42 ±0.09
better than 15%
−0.74 ±0.36
better than 5%
Execution−0.13 ±0.23
better than 61%
−1.89 ±1.25
better than 4%
Points left on the table2.78 ±0.07
lower than 32%
2.61 ±0.16
lower than 48%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Grigor Dimitrov serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGrigor winsv MalekMatchupOptimal
Wide46%74%77%77.9%±6.740% ▼
Body7%67%67%70.3%±9.30% ▼
T47%79%77%81.3%±5.160% ▲

Optimal v Malek Jaziri: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGrigor winsv MalekMatchupOptimal
Wide50%76%72%75.0%±6.363% ▲
Body10%64%67%67.5%±10.00% ▼
T40%72%71%71.3%±7.637% ▼

Optimal v Malek Jaziri: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Malek Jaziri serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMalek winsv GrigorMatchupOptimal
Wide45%72%72%71.1%±7.044% ▼
Body11%56%64%57.0%±11.10% ▼
T43%70%74%68.8%±7.856% ▲

Optimal v Grigor Dimitrov: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMalek winsv GrigorMatchupOptimal
Wide58%73%74%74.5%±6.771% ▲
Body6%65%65%66.8%±12.60% ▼
T36%69%72%68.3%±8.629% ▼

Optimal v Grigor Dimitrov: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Grigor Dimitrov returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MalekValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.4−1.3+3.3±2.3
FH down the line25%+1.7−0.4−1.3±0.0±3.6
FH crosscourt13%+5.5−0.9−2.4+2.2±3.7
FH slice through the middle7%−4.2+0.2+0.4−3.6±1.7
FH slice down the line2%−4.3+1.0±0.0−3.3±2.3

Lean FH through the middle: +1.8±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (2614 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MalekValue
BH slice through the middle45%−4.2+0.4−1.2−5.0±1.8
BH slice crosscourt19%+0.5+1.0±0.0+1.6±2.1
BH through the middle14%+6.4−2.7+0.8+4.5±2.4
BH slice down the line9%−8.4+1.8−0.6−7.2±2.6
BH down the line7%+4.2−0.8+2.6+6.0±3.7

Lean BH down the line: +7.1±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (3178 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MalekValue
FH through the middle53%−3.5+0.5−0.2−3.2±2.5
FH down the line25%−1.8+3.1−0.3+1.0±4.3
FH crosscourt18%−0.2+1.9±0.0+1.6±4.1
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7+0.5±0.0−12.2±1.4
FH slice crosscourt1%−12.5+0.3±0.0−12.2±1.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.2±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (631 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MalekValue
BH through the middle24%−2.9−1.1+2.8−1.3±2.1
BH slice through the middle21%−11.3−1.7+0.4−12.6±1.4
BH slice crosscourt19%−4.0−1.6±0.0−5.6±1.1
BH down the line12%−0.2−0.6+1.2+0.4±4.2
BH crosscourt8%+1.0+0.4−0.9+0.5±2.9
FH inside-in4%+0.6+0.5±0.0+1.0±4.2

Lean FH inside-in: +5.3±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (2339 returns charted)

Malek Jaziri returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GrigorValue
FH through the middle48%+4.3−2.1−0.5+1.7±2.3
FH crosscourt24%+5.5+1.7+0.5+7.6±3.3
FH down the line22%+1.7−1.0−0.1+0.6±3.4
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−0.2+0.3−4.1±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.0±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (99 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GrigorValue
BH through the middle32%+6.4−0.5+0.7+6.6±2.2
BH slice through the middle23%−4.2+2.4−0.2−2.0±2.0
BH slice crosscourt13%+0.5±0.0+1.4+1.9±2.5
BH crosscourt11%+8.8−4.6−0.2+4.0±2.5
BH down the line11%+4.2−2.5−4.7−3.0±3.6

Lean BH through the middle: +5.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (141 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GrigorValue
BH slice crosscourt30%−4.0+1.2−0.8−3.6±2.5
BH slice through the middle21%−11.3+0.7−0.8−11.4±2.3
BH through the middle19%−2.9+1.6−0.3−1.6±1.7
BH crosscourt16%+1.0−0.7+0.2+0.6±2.1
BH down the line8%−0.2+0.8+2.0+2.6±3.3

Lean BH through the middle: +2.1±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (86 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Grigor Dimitrov

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally+4.7±4.3+2.1+2.6
FH to their backhand · rally+4.1±4.0+1.2+2.9
FH to their backhand · return+2.8±5.6+3.0−0.3
BH to the middle · return+1.9±3.4−2.8+4.6
FH to the middle · return−1.0±2.6+0.7−1.7
BH to their backhand · rally−2.1±3.6−1.6−0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.8±4.6−1.0−3.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1−3.7±3.8−3.1−0.6
BH to their backhand · return +1−3.6±5.1−1.3−2.3
FH to the middle · rally−3.5±2.6±0.0−3.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.5±5.0+0.4−3.9

Malek Jaziri

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · return+4.6±4.1+1.2+3.4
BH slice to the middle · return+2.7±2.7+1.2+1.6
BH to the middle · return+1.6±2.6+2.0−0.4
FH to the middle · rally+0.4±2.5−0.2+0.5
BH slice to the middle · rally−0.8±2.6−0.5−0.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally−0.8±2.5+2.3−3.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−10.0±4.7−5.3−4.7
FH to their forehand · serve +1−5.5±5.1−1.5−4.0
FH to their forehand · rally−5.5±4.4−2.7−2.7
FH to their backhand · rally−3.5±4.2−0.4−3.0
BH to their backhand · rally−1.9±3.4−0.9−0.9

Against Malek Jaziri-like opponents

Grigor Dimitrov vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–65.2%35.7%
Players most similar to Malek Jaziri12 64.6%33.1%
Malek Jaziri (charted head-to-head)1 62.2%28.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Matteo Berrettini, Marton Fucsovics, Stan Wawrinka, Marcos Giron, James Duckworth, Dominic Thiem, Robin Haase, Roger Federer, Sebastien Grosjean. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head