ATP · Right-handed · 14 charted matches · 1999–2005
Sebastien Grosjean
Archetype: Blocks returns short · Works the corners
Against an average opponent
Serve and return points won, refitted against every opponent at once so a record built on weak or strong opposition is put on the same scale. Career, all surfaces, with a 90% margin. Raw is the plain share of points won.
Value per 100 shots
Points gained per 100 shots compared with an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for the strength of the opponents faced, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Raw is before the opponent adjustment. Built on 7,094 shots.
Shot expected value
The share of points Sebastien Grosjean goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 599 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 37% | 44.4%±5.3 | 47.6% |
| BH through the middle | 17% | 45.6%±7.5 | 43.7% |
| BH slice crosscourt | 12% | 39.9%±8.5 | 42.5% |
| FH inside-out | 10% | 54.2%±9.2 | 51.8% |
| BH down the line | 8% | 39.0%±9.6 | 46.4% |
| BH slice through the middle | 7% | 34.4%±9.8 | 35.1% |
| FH inside-in | 4% | 53.2%±12.2 | 54.7% |
| FH through the middle | 4% | 43.0%±12.6 | 45.2% |
Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 378 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 25% | 51.0%±7.7 | 48.0% |
| BH slice crosscourt | 25% | 42.9%±7.7 | 42.1% |
| BH through the middle | 14% | 38.9%±9.3 | 43.8% |
| FH inside-out | 11% | 50.9%±10.4 | 52.6% |
| BH down the line | 9% | 40.5%±10.9 | 46.5% |
| BH slice through the middle | 7% | 40.5%±11.8 | 35.1% |
| FH inside-in | 4% | 43.7%±14.0 | 54.3% |
| BH slice down the line | 3% | 41.1%±14.3 | 35.8% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your forehand side
position worth 44% to the average player · 272 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 33% | 43.4%±7.8 | 46.6% |
| FH through the middle | 31% | 43.0%±8.0 | 41.5% |
| FH down the line | 28% | 39.5%±8.2 | 44.7% |
| FH down the line + approach | 4% | 66.2%±14.2 | 69.3% |
Return +1: drive to your backhand side
position worth 44% to the average player · 215 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 25% | 43.8%±9.5 | 46.9% |
| BH through the middle | 22% | 39.7%±9.8 | 43.0% |
| FH inside-out | 16% | 42.4%±11.0 | 51.7% |
| BH slice crosscourt | 14% | 38.4%±11.3 | 40.9% |
| BH slice through the middle | 9% | 27.0%±11.7 | 32.6% |
| BH down the line | 7% | 41.2%±13.5 | 44.2% |
Serve under pressure
Pressure predictability index −6 How much less varied Sebastien Grosjean's first-serve direction gets on break points. Positive means easier to read. Based on 132 break-point first serves.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 49% | 48% | 73% / 73% |
| Body | 7% | 6% | 54% / 63% |
| T | 45% | 45% | 76% / 75% |
672 normal · 33 break-point 1st serves
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 50% | 45% | 70% / 73% |
| Body | 4% | 7% | 55% / 63% |
| T | 46% | 47% | 72% / 72% |
551 normal · 99 break-point 1st serves
Is the serve mix in equilibrium?
Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 49% | 60.0%±4.2 n=343 | 42% ▼ |
| Body | 7% | 53.7%±9.3 n=47 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 45% | 60.4%±4.3 n=315 | 58% ▲ |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.34).
Optimal mix: +0.4 per 100 first serves.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 49% | 60.0%±4.3 n=319 | 40% ▼ |
| Body | 4% | 54.8%±10.8 n=28 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 47% | 64.4%±4.3 n=303 | 60% ▲ |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.36).
Optimal mix: +0.5 per 100 first serves.
Exploitability 0.46 points per 100 first serves What the optimal mix would win over the current one, both courts. More exploitable than 100% of ATP servers. Tested on matches they weren't fitted on, ATP mixes picked this way win 0.33 per 100 first serves on average.
Repeating the previous direction to the same court: +2.3±3.9 points per 100 against switching. Negative means returners read repeats. Tour-wide, repeating costs women about 0.4 points per 100 and costs men nothing, so men's returners don't measurably anticipate direction. (579 repeats, 748 switches.)
Return by serve direction
Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.
| Serve | Court | Direction | Points | Won | vs tour | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Ad court | Body | 21 | 35% | −1.5±11.0 | |
| 1st | Ad court | T | 156 | 31% | +3.4±5.6 | |
| 1st | Ad court | Wide | 177 | 26% | −1.1±5.0 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Body | 19 | 33% | −4.0±11.0 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | T | 169 | 22% | −2.7±4.9 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Wide | 209 | 21% | −5.8±4.4 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Body | 66 | 46% | −3.7±8.4 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | T | 45 | 46% | −2.9±9.5 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Wide | 169 | 46% | −1.9±5.8 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Body | 101 | 49% | −0.4±7.2 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | T | 135 | 45% | −4.3±6.4 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Wide | 52 | 37% | −11.0±8.8 |
Signature patterns
Recurring sequences that win more than Sebastien Grosjean's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.
Serve → +1
- Wide serve (ad court) → FH inside-out used 2.9% · won 69% · +5.1±9.7 vs own baseline
- Wide serve (deuce court) → FH down the line + approach used 2.6% · won 68% · +3.5±10.1 vs own baseline
- T serve (ad court) → FH down the line used 2.2% · won 59% · −5.2±11.1 vs own baseline
- Wide serve (ad court) → FH down the line used 2.1% · won 58% · −6.0±11.3 vs own baseline
- T serve (ad court) → FH crosscourt used 2.5% · won 58% · −5.8±10.7 vs own baseline
Return
- vs body serve (deuce court) → FH through the middle, mid used 3.7% · won 49% · +11.2±10.8 vs own baseline
- vs wide serve (ad court) → BH crosscourt, mid used 7.0% · won 45% · +7.4±8.8 vs own baseline
- vs T serve (deuce court) → BH down the line, mid used 3.1% · won 46% · +8.2±11.3 vs own baseline
- vs wide serve (ad court) → BH crosscourt, short used 3.6% · won 44% · +6.8±10.8 vs own baseline
- vs T serve (ad court) → FH through the middle, mid used 4.4% · won 43% · +5.7±10.2 vs own baseline
Rally, consecutive own shots
- BH crosscourt → FH inside-out used 2.3% · won 51% · +7.2±10.7 vs own baseline
- BH slice crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 2.1% · won 51% · +7.3±10.9 vs own baseline
- FH through the middle → BH crosscourt used 2.6% · won 50% · +5.5±10.3 vs own baseline
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 4.7% · won 48% · +4.0±8.6 vs own baseline
- FH down the line → BH crosscourt used 2.1% · won 48% · +3.7±10.9 vs own baseline
Discovered sequences
Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Sebastien Grosjean wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.
- FH crosscourt → FH through the middle → FH down the line used 0.4% · won 49% · +4.9±12.9 vs own baseline · +3.2 vs tour on the same sequence
- BH slice crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 0.4% · won 49% · +4.9±12.9 vs own baseline · +10.2 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Arnaud Clement (3/6)
- FH down the line → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 1.1% · won 46% · +2.3±10.1 vs own baseline · −1.4 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Arnaud Clement (7/9)
- BH through the middle → FH down the line → BH through the middle used 0.4% · won 47% · +3.6±13.0 vs own baseline · +10.1 vs tour on the same sequence
- FH down the line → BH crosscourt → BH through the middle used 0.6% · won 47% · +2.7±12.2 vs own baseline · +6.2 vs tour on the same sequence
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → FH inside-out used 0.6% · won 47% · +2.7±12.2 vs own baseline · −0.8 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Arnaud Clement (4/10)
Strengths and vulnerabilities
Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.
Hurts opponents most with
| BH slice to their backhand · rally | +1.7 | 199 |
| BH to the middle · rally | +1.5 | 191 |
| Wide 2nd serve · ad court | +1.4 | 198 |
| FH to their backhand · serve +1 | +1.1 | 304 |
| FH to the middle · return | +0.3 | 226 |
Most exposed to
| FH to their backhand · serve +1 | −2.0 | 235 |
| BH to their backhand · return +1 | −1.8 | 183 |
| FH to their backhand · return | −1.5 | 149 |
| FH to their backhand · rally | −1.5 | 430 |
| T 2nd serve · deuce court | −1.2 | 135 |
Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Brandon Nakashima, Rinky Hijikata, Thiago Seyboth Wild, Jannik Sinner
Tactical fingerprint
Each bar shows how far a style trait is from the ATP average, in standard deviations.
| Run-around forehands | 33% | |
| T serves · ad | 47% | |
| Wide serves · deuce | 49% | |
| Backhand slice | 31% | |
| FH down the line | 33% | |
| Chipped returns | 18% | |
| Avg rally length | 4.1 | |
| Forehand share | 54% | |
| Through the middle | 25% | |
| Points at net | 12% | |
| T serves · deuce | 45% | |
| Unforced errors / shot | 9.8% | |
| Wide serves · ad | 49% | |
| Serve & volley | 4% | |
| BH down the line | 19% | |
| Point-ending shots | 22.2% | |
| Drop shots / shot | 0.9% | |
| Deep returns | 19% | |
| 1st serve in | 53% |
Plays most like
- Nicolas Kiefer 1999–2008 plan v
- Tomas Berdych 2005–2019 plan v
- James Blake 2002–2011 plan v
- Andreas Seppi 2008–2021 plan v
- Kyle Edmund 2016–2023 plan v
- Rinky Hijikata 2023–2026 plan v
- Lucas Pouille 2015–2024 plan v
- Fabio Fognini 2012–2025 plan v
Closest from another era
- Kyle Edmund 2016–2023
- Rinky Hijikata 2023–2026
- Lucas Pouille 2015–2024
Charted matches
- Sebastien Grosjean v Andy Roddick L Wimbledon QF · Grass · 29 Jun 2005
- Sebastien Grosjean v Roger Federer L Wimbledon SF · Grass · 3 Jul 2004
- Sebastien Grosjean v Andy Roddick L Queens Club F · Grass · 13 Jun 2004
- Mark Philippoussis v Sebastien Grosjean L Wimbledon SF · Grass · 1 Jul 2003
- Sebastien Grosjean v Marat Safin L Davis Cup World Group F RR · Clay · 1 Dec 2002
- Sebastien Grosjean v Andre Agassi L Madrid Masters SF · Hard · 19 Oct 2002
- Marat Safin v Sebastien Grosjean L Roland Garros QF · Clay · 5 Jun 2002
- Sebastien Grosjean v Lleyton Hewitt L Davis Cup World Group F RR · Grass · 2 Dec 2001
- Sebastien Grosjean v Lleyton Hewitt Masters Cup F · Hard · 18 Nov 2001
- Yevgeny Kafelnikov v Sebastien Grosjean W Masters Cup SF · Hard · 17 Nov 2001
- Tommy Haas v Sebastien Grosjean W Paris Masters SF · Hard · 3 Nov 2001
- Arnaud Clement v Sebastien Grosjean W Australian Open SF · Hard · 26 Jan 2001