Game plan
Holger Rune v Lorenzo Sonego
Every number combines what Holger Rune does well with what Lorenzo Sonego allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective
Forecast
Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Holger Rune's record against Lorenzo Sonego's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.0 on serve, +2.5 on return vs expectation (1513 points); head-to-head: +2.1 on serve, +7.1 on return vs expectation (170 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.
Head to head, per 100 shots
| Career | Holger | Lorenzo |
|---|---|---|
| Direction choice | −0.08 ±0.07 better than 35% | −0.13 ±0.09 better than 22% |
| Shot selection | +0.20 ±0.12 better than 72% | +0.12 ±0.22 better than 67% |
| Execution | −0.49 ±0.34 better than 45% | −0.79 ±0.46 better than 33% |
| Points left on the table | 2.80 ±0.11 lower than 30% | 2.89 ±0.14 lower than 25% |
Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.
Structural compatibility
Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Holger Rune +0.01, Lorenzo Sonego −0.47. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.
Serve plan
The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.
Holger Rune serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Holger wins | v Lorenzo | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 53% | 71% | 74% | 72.5%±3.8 | 50% ▼ |
| Body | 10% | 66% | 69% | 72.0%±7.3 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 36% | 70% | 77% | 72.7%±4.3 | 50% ▲ |
Optimal v Lorenzo Sonego: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Holger wins | v Lorenzo | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 49% | 71% | 75% | 73.5%±3.9 | 42% ▼ |
| Body | 7% | 60% | 70% | 66.9%±8.8 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 45% | 71% | 78% | 77.3%±4.0 | 58% ▲ |
Optimal v Lorenzo Sonego: +0.7±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Lorenzo Sonego serving
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Now | Lorenzo wins | v Holger | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 56% | 67% | 73% | 67.2%±3.8 | 43% ▼ |
| Body | 12% | 63% | 68% | 68.4%±7.4 | 12% |
| T | 32% | 75% | 77% | 77.3%±4.0 | 45% ▲ |
Optimal v Holger Rune: +1.0±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Now | Lorenzo wins | v Holger | Matchup | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 46% | 75% | 71% | 73.1%±4.1 | 46% |
| Body | 15% | 67% | 67% | 70.6%±6.9 | 2% ▼ |
| T | 39% | 73% | 73% | 74.3%±4.2 | 52% ▲ |
Optimal v Holger Rune: +0.2±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.
Return plan
Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.
Holger Rune returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Lorenzo | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 44% | +4.3 | −1.0 | ±0.0 | +3.2±1.8 |
| FH down the line | 19% | +1.7 | +0.8 | +0.4 | +2.9±3.5 |
| FH slice through the middle | 17% | −4.2 | +0.2 | −1.5 | −5.6±2.0 |
| FH crosscourt | 13% | +5.5 | −1.3 | +3.6 | +7.7±3.8 |
| FH slice down the line | 4% | −4.3 | +0.9 | +1.2 | −2.2±3.2 |
Lean FH crosscourt: +6.1±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1175 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Lorenzo | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 41% | +6.4 | −0.1 | +0.7 | +6.9±1.8 |
| BH crosscourt | 30% | +8.8 | +0.5 | +0.2 | +9.4±2.6 |
| BH slice through the middle | 12% | −4.2 | −1.8 | +0.1 | −5.9±2.2 |
| BH down the line | 9% | +4.2 | −2.4 | +3.9 | +5.7±4.4 |
| BH slice crosscourt | 4% | +0.5 | −1.0 | −2.3 | −2.8±3.0 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +4.4±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1090 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Lorenzo | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 48% | −3.5 | +1.4 | −0.1 | −2.2±2.4 |
| FH down the line | 32% | −1.8 | −0.5 | −1.5 | −3.8±4.4 |
| FH crosscourt | 16% | −0.2 | −4.8 | −0.3 | −5.3±4.3 |
| FH slice down the line | 2% | −9.4 | +0.4 | ±0.0 | −9.0±1.4 |
| FH slice through the middle | 2% | −12.7 | −0.7 | −0.3 | −13.7±1.5 |
Lean FH through the middle: +1.4±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (321 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Lorenzo | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 44% | −2.9 | −1.2 | +0.8 | −3.3±1.8 |
| BH crosscourt | 40% | +1.0 | −0.9 | +0.2 | +0.3±2.5 |
| BH down the line | 8% | −0.2 | −2.9 | +0.6 | −2.5±4.9 |
| FH through the middle | 3% | −2.9 | −1.9 | −0.1 | −4.8±2.0 |
| FH inside-out | 2% | +1.0 | −4.4 | −1.5 | −4.9±3.2 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +2.3±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (680 returns charted)
Lorenzo Sonego returning
1st serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Holger | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 33% | +4.3 | +1.6 | +1.7 | +7.6±2.0 |
| FH slice through the middle | 23% | −4.2 | +0.7 | −0.5 | −4.0±2.0 |
| FH down the line | 19% | +1.7 | +1.7 | +0.4 | +3.8±3.8 |
| FH crosscourt | 12% | +5.5 | ±0.0 | +1.2 | +6.7±3.7 |
| FH slice down the line | 9% | −4.3 | −1.4 | −1.4 | −7.1±3.2 |
Lean FH through the middle: +5.4±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (725 returns charted)
1st serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Holger | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 41% | +6.4 | +0.2 | −0.2 | +6.4±1.7 |
| BH crosscourt | 23% | +8.8 | ±0.0 | +1.3 | +10.2±2.6 |
| BH slice through the middle | 15% | −4.2 | −0.4 | +0.2 | −4.4±2.3 |
| BH down the line | 10% | +4.2 | −4.5 | −0.4 | −0.7±4.2 |
| BH slice down the line | 5% | −8.4 | −1.1 | ±0.0 | −9.4±3.4 |
Lean BH crosscourt: +6.5±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (873 returns charted)
2nd serve to the forehand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Holger | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH through the middle | 48% | −3.5 | −1.2 | +0.8 | −3.9±2.4 |
| FH down the line | 24% | −1.8 | +2.8 | −0.5 | +0.4±4.3 |
| FH crosscourt | 20% | −0.2 | −0.2 | −1.7 | −2.2±3.9 |
| FH slice through the middle | 4% | −12.7 | +0.5 | +0.8 | −11.5±1.7 |
| FH slice down the line | 4% | −9.4 | −0.2 | ±0.0 | −9.6±1.3 |
Lean FH down the line: +3.5±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (139 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
2nd serve to the backhand
| Return | Now | Tour | Own | v Holger | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH through the middle | 43% | −2.9 | −1.1 | −1.2 | −5.2±1.7 |
| BH crosscourt | 34% | +1.0 | −1.2 | −0.7 | −0.9±2.3 |
| BH down the line | 9% | −0.2 | −0.5 | ±0.0 | −0.7±4.7 |
| FH through the middle | 7% | −2.9 | +1.0 | +0.8 | −1.1±2.1 |
| FH inside-out | 3% | +1.0 | −0.7 | −0.5 | −0.3±3.3 |
Lean FH inside-out: +2.5±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (708 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)
Rally plan
Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.
Holger Rune
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH slice to their forehand · rally | +4.2±4.9 | +2.1 | +2.1 |
| Smash to their forehand · rally | +3.3±6.4 | +3.9 | −0.6 |
| FH to their forehand · rally | +3.3±2.4 | +2.4 | +0.9 |
| FH to their forehand · return +1 | +3.1±4.4 | +4.5 | −1.4 |
| BH to their forehand · return | +3.0±5.2 | −0.3 | +3.2 |
| FH to their forehand · serve +1 | +2.3±3.1 | +0.2 | +2.1 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH to their forehand · return +1 | −9.4±6.2 | −5.4 | −3.9 |
| BH volley to their backhand · rally | −9.2±8.2 | −5.2 | −4.0 |
| FH volley to their backhand · rally | −6.7±8.4 | −2.8 | −3.9 |
| FH volley to their forehand · rally | −5.9±7.8 | +3.1 | −9.0 |
| BH to their forehand · rally | −3.5±4.1 | −2.4 | −1.1 |
Lorenzo Sonego
Favour
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH volley to their forehand · rally | +4.8±7.8 | +1.3 | +3.6 |
| BH volley to their backhand · rally | +4.4±8.4 | +4.0 | +0.4 |
| FH to their backhand · return | +2.5±4.0 | +2.1 | +0.4 |
| FH slice to their forehand · rally | +2.3±5.8 | +0.4 | +1.9 |
| FH to their backhand · serve +1 | +2.1±2.7 | −1.5 | +3.6 |
| FH to the middle · return | +1.6±2.0 | +0.5 | +1.1 |
Avoid
| Shot | Edge | Own | Theirs |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH volley to their forehand · rally | −10.8±8.6 | −6.3 | −4.6 |
| BH to their forehand · serve +1 | −8.7±6.2 | −5.7 | −3.0 |
| BH to their forehand · return | −4.8±5.0 | −3.6 | −1.1 |
| BH to their forehand · rally | −4.6±4.1 | −5.0 | +0.5 |
| BH to the middle · serve +1 | −3.8±3.0 | −1.4 | −2.4 |
Against Lorenzo Sonego-like opponents
| Holger Rune v | Matches | Serve pts won | Return pts won |
|---|---|---|---|
| All charted opponents | – | 62.8% | 35.1% |
| Players most similar to Lorenzo Sonego | 10 | 64.6% | 35.9% |
| Lorenzo Sonego (charted head-to-head) | 1 | 69.4% | 42.9% |
Similar by tactical fingerprint: Casper Ruud, Stefanos Tsitsipas, Arthur Fils, Ben Shelton, Carlos Alcaraz, Tallon Griekspoor, Alejandro Tabilo, Felix Auger Aliassime, Zizou Bergs. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.