RallyIQ

Game plan

Jaume Munar v Andy Murray

Every number combines what Jaume Munar does well with what Andy Murray allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Jaume Munar wins, best of 3 29%90%: 15%–47% · best of 5: 24%
Serve points won 56.3% / 60.6% Jaume / Andy · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 27%serve 56.0% / 60.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Jaume Munar's record against Andy Murray's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.9 on serve, +1.4 on return vs expectation (395 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJaumeAndy
Direction choice−0.01 ±0.08
better than 53%
+0.14 ±0.03
better than 87%
Shot selection−0.31 ±0.21
better than 22%
−0.45 ±0.05
better than 13%
Execution+0.60 ±0.36
better than 86%
+0.94 ±0.16
better than 95%
Points left on the table2.55 ±0.11
lower than 55%
2.23 ±0.05
lower than 90%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Jaume Munar +1.39, Andy Murray +1.39. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Jaume Munar serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJaume winsv AndyMatchupOptimal
Wide55%68%70%64.2%±3.451% ▼
Body10%65%59%61.3%±7.50% ▼
T35%73%76%73.7%±4.249% ▲

Optimal v Andy Murray: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJaume winsv AndyMatchupOptimal
Wide51%68%71%65.6%±4.063% ▲
Body14%64%57%58.6%±7.11% ▼
T35%66%68%61.4%±4.536%

Optimal v Andy Murray: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Andy Murray serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAndy winsv JaumeMatchupOptimal
Wide47%71%72%69.7%±3.641% ▼
Body8%67%54%58.2%±7.60% ▼
T46%80%71%76.6%±3.459% ▲

Optimal v Jaume Munar: +0.5±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAndy winsv JaumeMatchupOptimal
Wide47%77%70%73.8%±3.342% ▼
Body8%61%63%61.8%±8.20% ▼
T45%70%69%67.1%±4.358% ▲

Optimal v Jaume Munar: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Jaume Munar returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AndyValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3−0.4+1.2+5.0±1.6
FH slice through the middle22%−4.2+0.7+1.4−2.2±1.7
FH down the line13%+1.7−0.2+0.2+1.7±3.3
FH crosscourt11%+5.5+2.3+1.3+9.0±3.3
FH slice down the line7%−4.3+1.8+1.1−1.4±3.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.2±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (701 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AndyValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4+2.3−0.1+8.6±1.6
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+1.2+0.9+10.9±2.4
BH slice through the middle13%−4.2−0.1−0.4−4.7±1.8
BH down the line10%+4.2+1.9+0.1+6.3±3.8
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5−1.6+0.5−0.5±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.5±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (760 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AndyValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+2.5+0.7−0.2±2.2
FH crosscourt25%−0.2+0.4+1.5+1.7±3.4
FH down the line21%−1.8+0.8+2.6+1.6±3.7
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7+0.8−0.4−12.3±2.1
FH slice down the line4%−9.4+0.6−1.4−10.2±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.2±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (170 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AndyValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9−0.7+1.1−2.4±1.5
BH crosscourt29%+1.0+1.3+1.8+4.1±2.2
BH down the line13%−0.2+2.2+1.3+3.3±3.9
FH through the middle6%−2.9−1.1+0.7−3.3±1.8
FH inside-in3%+0.6−0.1+1.5+2.0±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.7±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (456 returns charted)

Andy Murray returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JaumeValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3+1.4+1.2+6.9±1.5
FH down the line17%+1.7+6.2+0.3+8.1±3.1
FH crosscourt16%+5.5+1.9+2.3+9.7±2.9
FH slice through the middle14%−4.2+2.7−0.5−2.1±1.8
FH slice down the line5%−4.3+3.1+1.2±0.0±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.1±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (5314 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JaumeValue
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+4.6+0.3+13.7±2.2
BH through the middle25%+6.4+2.2−0.8+7.9±1.6
BH slice through the middle25%−4.2+2.7−1.1−2.6±1.9
BH slice crosscourt15%+0.5+2.4−1.9+1.0±2.3
BH slice down the line4%−8.4+0.9−0.8−8.3±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.6±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (4642 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JaumeValue
FH through the middle43%−3.5+1.6+1.1−0.8±1.9
FH down the line28%−1.8+2.5−0.2+0.6±3.6
FH crosscourt23%−0.2+1.9+0.3+2.0±3.5
BH through the middle3%+0.1−1.3−1.6−2.8±1.9
BH inside-in1%+2.5+2.7−1.1+4.1±3.1

Lean BH inside-in: +3.9±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (1297 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JaumeValue
BH crosscourt57%+1.0+1.7−1.1+1.6±2.2
BH through the middle29%−2.9+0.1−1.6−4.4±1.8
BH down the line7%−0.2+2.4+3.3+5.5±4.6
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.0−1.9±0.0−5.9±1.8
BH slice through the middle2%−11.3−1.4−0.2−12.9±2.0

Lean BH down the line: +5.9±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (2339 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Jaume Munar

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally+5.4±3.2+3.6+1.8
BH to their backhand · return +1+5.2±2.9+2.5+2.7
BH to their forehand · return +1+4.2±5.6+5.1−1.0
FH to their forehand · return +1+3.9±3.9+3.6+0.3
FH to their backhand · return +1+3.5±3.9+1.9+1.5
BH to their backhand · rally+3.3±1.6+1.9+1.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · serve +1−1.9±2.6+0.3−2.2
BH slice to the middle · rally−1.5±2.5−1.4−0.1
FH to their forehand · return−1.2±4.5−0.8−0.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1−1.0±2.7−1.5+0.5
FH to the middle · return +1−0.6±2.9+0.6−1.1

Andy Murray

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+8.0±7.7+5.1+3.0
BH to their forehand · return+7.2±4.7+2.8+4.4
BH volley to their forehand · rally+5.2±7.8+0.1+5.1
FH to their forehand · return+4.9±4.0+3.8+1.1
BH to their backhand · return+3.6±2.3+2.3+1.4
BH to their forehand · rally+3.6±3.4−0.2+3.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
Smash to their forehand · rally−2.7±6.1+1.4−4.1
BH slice to their forehand · rally−2.6±4.5−3.7+1.1
FH to the middle · serve +1−2.2±2.7−2.5+0.3
BH to their forehand · serve +1−1.6±5.6−1.3−0.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally−1.2±2.8−0.3−0.9

Against Andy Murray-like opponents

Jaume Munar vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–60.1%37.4%
Players most similar to Andy Murray3 60.4%35.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Daniil Medvedev, Novak Djokovic, Karen Khachanov, Laslo Djere, Nishesh Basavareddy, Richard Gasquet, Andreas Seppi, Marcos Baghdatis, David Nalbandian. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.