RallyIQ

Game plan

John Mcenroe v Boris Becker

Every number combines what John Mcenroe does well with what Boris Becker allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

John Mcenroe wins, best of 3 41%90%: 21%–64% · best of 5: 39%
Serve points won 62.8% / 64.7% John / Boris · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 40%serve 63.2% / 65.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by John Mcenroe's record against Boris Becker's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.4 on serve, +0.9 on return vs expectation (521 points); head-to-head: −2.3 on serve, +2.2 on return vs expectation (638 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJohnBoris
Direction choice−0.26 ±0.08
better than 9%
+0.03 ±0.05
better than 65%
Shot selection+0.77 ±0.17
better than 98%
+0.33 ±0.11
better than 83%
Execution−0.45 ±0.30
better than 46%
−0.37 ±0.22
better than 50%
Points left on the table4.83 ±0.17
lower than 1%
3.75 ±0.16
lower than 5%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

John Mcenroe serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJohn winsv BorisMatchupOptimal
Wide43%75%73%75.9%±2.942%
Body17%64%66%66.2%±4.431% ▲
T40%69%72%66.4%±3.227% ▼

Optimal v Boris Becker: +0.4±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJohn winsv BorisMatchupOptimal
Wide52%74%70%71.2%±2.865% ▲
Body10%64%61%62.3%±5.90% ▼
T38%78%71%77.7%±3.235% ▼

Optimal v Boris Becker: +0.4±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Boris Becker serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBoris winsv JohnMatchupOptimal
Wide41%78%70%75.5%±2.654% ▲
Body9%70%63%69.0%±5.70% ▼
T50%81%72%78.4%±2.646% ▼

Optimal v John Mcenroe: +0.2±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBoris winsv JohnMatchupOptimal
Wide49%78%69%74.1%±3.136% ▼
Body12%71%65%72.2%±4.812%
T39%75%72%75.2%±2.852% ▲

Optimal v John Mcenroe: +0.4±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

John Mcenroe returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3+1.6−1.6+4.3±1.5
FH crosscourt26%+5.5+5.7−0.8+10.4±2.7
FH down the line20%+1.7+0.9+1.5+4.0±3.0
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2+2.4+0.1−1.8±2.2
BH through the middle1%+6.6+1.4−4.2+3.7±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1163 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
BH through the middle36%+6.4−2.3−4.2±0.0±1.3
BH down the line25%+4.2+0.4−3.6+1.0±2.6
BH slice through the middle16%−4.2+3.1−1.9−2.9±1.5
BH crosscourt9%+8.8±0.0−4.1+4.7±2.6
BH slice down the line9%−8.4+5.1+1.7−1.5±2.6
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5+0.2+5.3+6.0±2.6

Lean BH slice crosscourt: +5.7±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1830 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
FH crosscourt37%−0.2+2.2+2.0+4.0±3.2
FH through the middle36%−3.5−0.4−1.2−5.0±2.1
FH down the line24%−1.8+1.3+2.1+1.6±3.8
FH slice down the line2%−9.4−1.1+0.6−9.9±1.9
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7+1.5−0.4−11.6±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.3±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (369 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
BH through the middle32%−2.9+2.3−1.8−2.3±1.4
BH down the line22%−0.2+3.5+1.8+5.1±3.1
BH crosscourt18%+1.0+2.8+0.9+4.7±2.3
BH slice through the middle8%−11.3+3.9+0.5−6.9±2.0
FH through the middle6%−2.9+2.6−1.2−1.4±1.9
FH inside-out3%+1.0+5.3+2.1+8.3±3.0

Lean FH inside-out: +7.4±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1151 returns charted)

Boris Becker returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JohnValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3−1.3−4.0−1.1±1.4
FH down the line34%+1.7+2.1−2.2+1.6±2.6
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+2.7+5.4+13.6±2.9
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2+2.6−0.5−2.1±2.2
FH slice down the line1%−4.3−1.1±0.0−5.4±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +11.0±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (2642 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JohnValue
BH through the middle29%+6.4−2.2−4.5−0.3±1.3
BH slice through the middle20%−4.2+3.0−3.4−4.6±1.5
BH down the line18%+4.2+0.1−1.8+2.6±2.6
BH slice crosscourt15%+0.5+5.9+5.5+11.9±2.2
BH crosscourt12%+8.8+1.6+3.6+14.0±2.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +11.4±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (3917 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JohnValue
FH through the middle36%−3.5+0.8−1.3−3.9±1.9
FH down the line32%−1.8+2.2+0.9+1.4±3.5
FH crosscourt28%−0.2+2.8+2.6+5.2±3.3
BH slice through the middle1%−6.9+0.5−1.1−7.5±1.9
BH inside-in1%+2.5+2.9+1.8+7.1±2.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.9±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (747 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JohnValue
BH through the middle26%−2.9−1.9+0.1−4.7±1.3
BH slice crosscourt21%−4.0+3.0−1.4−2.5±2.1
BH crosscourt19%+1.0+6.4+1.8+9.2±2.0
BH down the line13%−0.2−2.4+2.7+0.1±3.4
BH slice through the middle10%−11.3+3.9−1.1−8.5±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +10.1±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (2680 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

John Mcenroe

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · return+9.6±2.8+3.8+5.9
FH to their backhand · return+6.8±1.8+6.4+0.4
BH volley to their forehand · rally+6.5±4.6+10.4−3.9
BH slice to the middle · return +1+5.6±2.0+3.3+2.3
BH slice to the middle · rally+5.4±1.4+3.2+2.2
BH slice to their forehand · return +1+4.5±3.2+4.3+0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
Smash to the middle · rally−12.1±5.0−8.2−4.0
BH to the middle · return +1−6.5±1.7−2.3−4.2
FH volley to the middle · rally−5.4±5.4+0.8−6.2
FH volley to the middle · serve +1−5.0±3.1−3.0−2.1
FH volley to their forehand · serve +1−4.7±3.1−3.8−0.9

Boris Becker

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH lob to their backhand · return +1+10.8±4.3+4.7+6.1
BH slice to their forehand · serve +1+7.9±3.6+2.4+5.5
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1+7.7±2.4+4.5+3.2
BH slice to their forehand · return+7.6±2.7+3.8+3.7
BH volley to their forehand · rally+7.3±4.4−0.2+7.5
FH to their backhand · return +1+7.2±2.4+0.7+6.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1−8.1±1.9−3.4−4.7
BH volley to the middle · rally−5.9±5.0−0.8−5.1
FH to the middle · rally−5.9±1.5−3.5−2.4
FH to the middle · return−4.6±1.1−1.1−3.5
BH to the middle · return−4.4±0.9−2.1−2.3

Against Boris Becker-like opponents

John Mcenroe vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.6%35.9%
Players most similar to Boris Becker3 65.5%33.1%
Boris Becker (charted head-to-head)2 60.7%37.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Tim Henman, Mark Philippoussis, Pete Sampras, Todd Martin, Richard Krajicek, Michael Stich, Malivai Washington, Guy Forget, Brad Gilbert. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head