ATP · Right-handed · 21 charted matches · 1995–2003
Mark Philippoussis
Archetype: Serve-and-volleyer · Net rusher
Against an average opponent
Serve and return points won, refitted against every opponent at once so a record built on weak or strong opposition is put on the same scale. Career, all surfaces, with a 90% margin. Raw is the plain share of points won.
Value per 100 shots
Points gained per 100 shots compared with an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for the strength of the opponents faced, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Raw is before the opponent adjustment. Built on 8,444 shots.
Shot expected value
The share of points Mark Philippoussis goes on to win after each option in the positions they face most often, shrunk toward tour average when the sample is small. Showing the 8 most-used options; teal marks the best one with at least 30 shots.
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 375 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 34% | 40.1%±6.7 | 47.6% |
| BH slice crosscourt | 17% | 40.9%±8.9 | 42.5% |
| BH through the middle | 16% | 40.4%±9.0 | 43.7% |
| BH down the line | 10% | 36.7%±10.4 | 46.4% |
| BH slice through the middle | 7% | 35.5%±11.4 | 35.1% |
| FH inside-out | 7% | 46.5%±12.1 | 51.8% |
| BH slice down the line | 5% | 31.0%±12.0 | 37.1% |
| FH inside-in | 4% | 55.7%±14.0 | 54.7% |
Return +1: drive to your backhand side
position worth 44% to the average player · 241 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 35% | 36.0%±7.7 | 46.9% |
| BH slice crosscourt | 24% | 33.1%±8.7 | 40.9% |
| BH through the middle | 15% | 45.7%±11.0 | 43.0% |
| BH slice through the middle | 12% | 33.0%±10.9 | 32.6% |
| BH down the line | 7% | 44.3%±13.3 | 44.2% |
Long rally, 9+: drive to your backhand side
position worth 46% to the average player · 184 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| BH crosscourt | 28% | 40.3%±9.6 | 48.0% |
| BH slice crosscourt | 23% | 38.8%±10.1 | 42.1% |
| BH through the middle | 13% | 41.3%±12.4 | 43.8% |
| BH slice through the middle | 13% | 53.5%±12.5 | 35.1% |
| BH down the line | 8% | 50.9%±14.1 | 46.5% |
| BH slice down the line | 6% | 29.5%±13.5 | 35.8% |
| FH inside-in | 5% | 56.2%±14.9 | 54.3% |
Rally, shots 5–8: drive to your middle
position worth 51% to the average player · 164 shots
| Option | Used | Win % | Tour |
|---|---|---|---|
| FH crosscourt | 30% | 47.2%±9.9 | 52.7% |
| FH down the line | 27% | 52.0%±10.3 | 51.5% |
| BH crosscourt | 12% | 45.7%±13.1 | 49.1% |
| FH through the middle | 11% | 45.8%±13.3 | 47.0% |
| BH through the middle | 7% | 41.8%±14.3 | 46.8% |
Serve under pressure
Pressure predictability index +17 How much less varied Mark Philippoussis's first-serve direction gets on break points. Positive means easier to read. Based on 148 break-point first serves.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 45% | 55% ▲ | 81% / 73% |
| Body | 7% | 7% | 66% / 63% |
| T | 47% | 38% ▼ | 80% / 75% |
1,133 normal · 29 break-point 1st serves
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Break pt | Won when in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 49% | 59% ▲ | 79% / 73% |
| Body | 5% | 0% | 63% / 63% |
| T | 46% | 41% | 79% / 72% |
943 normal · 119 break-point 1st serves
Is the serve mix in equilibrium?
Game theory says a well-mixed server wins equally often with every direction they use. If one direction wins more, it's underused and points are being left behind. This is the minimax test Walker and Wooders ran on Wimbledon finals, applied to every charted first serve. Win rates include faults. "Optimal" allows for returners reading a habit. No measurable response (−0.05 ± 0.15 points per 100 serves for every 10 points of habitual usage), measured from ATP servers whose mix drifted between matches. Shifts stay within the range servers' habits actually vary, the only range that response was measured over.
Deuce court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 46% | 69.5%±3.2 n=530 | 59% ▲ |
| Body | 7% | 64.4%±7.3 n=86 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 47% | 67.1%±3.2 n=546 | 41% ▼ |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.40).
Optimal mix: +0.6 per 100 first serves.
Ad court
| 1st serve | Usage | Points won | Optimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wide | 50% | 67.6%±3.2 n=531 | 41% ▼ |
| Body | 4% | 64.0%±9.1 n=45 | 0% ▼ |
| T | 46% | 68.1%±3.4 n=486 | 59% ▲ |
Consistent with an optimal mix (p = 0.99).
Optimal mix: +0.3 per 100 first serves.
Exploitability 0.46 points per 100 first serves What the optimal mix would win over the current one, both courts. More exploitable than 100% of ATP servers. Tested on matches they weren't fitted on, ATP mixes picked this way win 0.33 per 100 first serves on average.
Repeating the previous direction to the same court: +2.3±3.4 points per 100 against switching. Negative means returners read repeats. Tour-wide, repeating costs women about 0.4 points per 100 and costs men nothing, so men's returners don't measurably anticipate direction. (997 repeats, 1,185 switches.)
Return by serve direction
Return points won against each serve direction, compared with the tour average.
| Serve | Court | Direction | Points | Won | vs tour | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Ad court | Body | 47 | 36% | −0.5±9.0 | |
| 1st | Ad court | T | 252 | 23% | −5.2±4.1 | |
| 1st | Ad court | Wide | 332 | 22% | −4.8±3.6 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Body | 82 | 35% | −1.9±7.4 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | T | 324 | 17% | −8.0±3.3 | |
| 1st | Deuce court | Wide | 282 | 21% | −6.0±3.8 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Body | 83 | 40% | −9.7±7.6 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | T | 70 | 50% | +0.5±8.2 | |
| 2nd | Ad court | Wide | 253 | 44% | −4.0±4.9 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Body | 157 | 46% | −3.2±6.0 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | T | 195 | 44% | −5.7±5.4 | |
| 2nd | Deuce court | Wide | 94 | 43% | −5.0±7.3 |
Signature patterns
Recurring sequences that win more than Mark Philippoussis's own baseline, ranked by edge weighted by how often they're used.
Serve → +1
- Wide serve (ad court) → FH volley crosscourt used 2.4% · won 75% · −0.5±8.4 vs own baseline
- Wide serve (deuce court) → BH volley crosscourt used 2.3% · won 74% · −2.3±8.7 vs own baseline
- Wide serve (ad court) → BH volley down the line used 3.0% · won 68% · −8.3±8.5 vs own baseline
Return
- vs wide serve (ad court) → BH slice through the middle, mid used 2.5% · won 42% · +13.8±10.2 vs own baseline
- vs wide serve (ad court) → BH through the middle, mid used 2.7% · won 37% · +8.9±9.7 vs own baseline
- vs wide serve (ad court) → BH slice crosscourt, mid used 3.8% · won 36% · +7.4±8.7 vs own baseline
- vs T serve (ad court) → FH through the middle, mid used 2.4% · won 36% · +8.0±10.0 vs own baseline
- vs wide serve (deuce court) → FH through the middle, mid used 3.0% · won 35% · +7.3±9.4 vs own baseline
Rally, consecutive own shots
- FH down the line → FH crosscourt used 2.8% · won 52% · +8.8±11.4 vs own baseline
- BH through the middle → FH crosscourt used 3.8% · won 50% · +6.9±10.6 vs own baseline
- FH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 3.2% · won 47% · +4.2±11.1 vs own baseline
- BH through the middle → FH down the line used 2.7% · won 47% · +3.9±11.5 vs own baseline
- BH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 5.1% · won 45% · +2.7±9.7 vs own baseline
Discovered sequences
Mined from every me → opponent → me run of three shots, with no templates. Ranked by how much more often Mark Philippoussis wins the point once the sequence happens, weighted by how often it happens. Think of them as chess openings.
- FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH down the line used 1.1% · won 54% · +8.9±10.8 vs own baseline · +13.8 vs tour on the same sequence
- BH through the middle → FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt used 0.6% · won 52% · +6.7±12.5 vs own baseline · +16.2 vs tour on the same sequence
- BH slice crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt used 0.5% · won 47% · +1.9±12.8 vs own baseline · +3.9 vs tour on the same sequence
- BH crosscourt → BH crosscourt → BH down the line used 0.6% · won 45% · ±0.0±12.2 vs own baseline · −2.6 vs tour on the same sequence Disrupted by Andre Agassi (6/9)
- FH crosscourt → FH crosscourt → FH through the middle used 0.5% · won 43% · −1.9±12.9 vs own baseline · −4.6 vs tour on the same sequence
- BH crosscourt → BH through the middle → FH crosscourt used 0.6% · won 43% · −2.2±12.1 vs own baseline · −13.1 vs tour on the same sequence
Strengths and vulnerabilities
Value per 100 shots compared with the average player hitting (strengths) or facing (vulnerabilities) the same shot. Only shot types seen at least 120 times.
Hurts opponents most with
| T 1st serve · ad court | +2.6 | 473 |
| BH slice to their backhand · return | +2.6 | 256 |
| Wide 1st serve · ad court | +2.5 | 520 |
| Wide 1st serve · deuce court | +2.3 | 516 |
| BH slice to their backhand · rally | +1.3 | 122 |
Most exposed to
| FH to their forehand · rally | −1.5 | 269 |
| Wide 1st serve · ad court | −1.1 | 540 |
| BH to their backhand · serve +1 | −0.9 | 210 |
| FH to their backhand · serve +1 | −0.8 | 207 |
| T 1st serve · ad court | −0.8 | 404 |
Active players who are best at the shot in the top weakness: Roberto Carballes Baena, Roberto Bautista Agut, Miomir Kecmanovic, Pedro Martinez, Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Tactical fingerprint
Each bar shows how far a style trait is from the ATP average, in standard deviations.
| Serve & volley | 46% | |
| Chipped returns | 35% | |
| Point-ending shots | 33.1% | |
| Points at net | 20% | |
| T serves · ad | 46% | |
| FH down the line | 35% | |
| Backhand slice | 34% | |
| Unforced errors / shot | 11.9% | |
| Wide serves · deuce | 46% | |
| T serves · deuce | 47% | |
| BH down the line | 21% | |
| Run-around forehands | 19% | |
| Wide serves · ad | 50% | |
| 1st serve in | 60% | |
| Deep returns | 22% | |
| Drop shots / shot | 0.5% | |
| Through the middle | 21% | |
| Forehand share | 48% | |
| Avg rally length | 2.9 |
Plays most like
- Pete Sampras 1990–2002 plan v
- Todd Martin 1992–2001 plan v
- Tim Henman 1995–2006 plan v
- Boris Becker 1985–1999 plan v
- Brad Gilbert 1987–1994 plan v
- Malivai Washington 1992–1996 plan v
- Gilles Muller 2005–2017 plan v
- Mario Ancic 2002–2008 plan v
Closest from another era
- Jo Wilfried Tsonga 2007–2022
- Pierre Hugues Herbert 2014–2025
- Sergiy Stakhovsky 2010–2022
Charted matches
- Roger Federer v Mark Philippoussis L Davis Cup World Group SF RR · Hard · 19 Sep 2003
- Roger Federer v Mark Philippoussis L Wimbledon F · Grass · 6 Jul 2003
- Mark Philippoussis v Sebastien Grosjean W Wimbledon SF · Grass · 1 Jul 2003
- Mark Philippoussis v Andre Agassi W Wimbledon R16 · Grass · 30 Jun 2003
- Mark Philippoussis v Alexander Popp L Wimbledon QF · Grass · 29 Jun 2003
- Andre Agassi v Mark Philippoussis L Miami Masters R16 · Hard · 25 Mar 2003
- Paradorn Srichaphan v Mark Philippoussis W Australian Open R128 · Hard · 15 Jan 2003
- Mark Philippoussis v Marat Safin L Paris Masters F · Hard · 19 Nov 2000
- Mark Philippoussis v Gustavo Kuerten W Paris Masters SF · Hard · 18 Nov 2000
- Carlos Moya v Mark Philippoussis W Indian Wells Masters F · Hard · 14 Mar 1999
- Patrick Rafter v Mark Philippoussis L US Open F · Hard · 13 Sep 1998
- Mark Philippoussis v Carlos Moya W US Open SF · Hard · 12 Sep 1998