RallyIQ

Game plan

Jonas Bjorkman v Nicolas Jarry

Every number combines what Jonas Bjorkman does well with what Nicolas Jarry allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Jonas Bjorkman wins, best of 3 17%90%: 4%–42% · best of 5: 11%
Serve points won 63.5% / 71.6% Jonas / Nicolas · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 17%serve 63.5% / 71.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Jonas Bjorkman's record against Nicolas Jarry's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerJonasNicolas
Direction choice−0.13 ±0.17
better than 25%
−0.23 ±0.09
better than 9%
Shot selection+0.25 ±0.18
better than 76%
+0.02 ±0.14
better than 54%
Execution−1.30 ±0.45
better than 15%
−0.45 ±0.54
better than 46%
Points left on the table3.56 ±0.32
lower than 7%
3.09 ±0.16
lower than 16%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Jonas Bjorkman serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJonas winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide39%69%76%72.5%±6.152% ▲
Body22%65%67%69.2%±8.89% ▼
T39%72%73%69.5%±7.039%

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJonas winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide37%68%76%71.2%±6.950% ▲
Body19%59%68%63.7%±10.35% ▼
T44%67%76%71.5%±6.745%

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.9±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Nicolas Jarry serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv JonasMatchupOptimal
Wide43%74%79%79.4%±5.256% ▲
Body6%64%65%65.3%±11.00% ▼
T51%74%80%79.4%±5.844% ▼

Optimal v Jonas Bjorkman: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv JonasMatchupOptimal
Wide55%75%79%80.5%±5.749% ▼
Body8%67%69%72.5%±9.70% ▼
T38%75%81%83.1%±5.051% ▲

Optimal v Jonas Bjorkman: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Jonas Bjorkman returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH through the middle44%+4.3−0.5+2.6+6.3±2.6
FH crosscourt31%+5.5−4.9−0.7−0.1±4.3
FH down the line23%+1.7−2.0−1.6−1.8±4.5
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2−0.6+1.5−3.3±1.6

Lean FH through the middle: +4.1±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (239 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4−2.4+3.5+7.4±2.3
BH crosscourt34%+8.8+0.3+1.5+10.5±3.3
BH down the line8%+4.2−0.6+6.3+10.0±4.3
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−1.3+1.2−4.3±2.1
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.6−0.4−0.5±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.7±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (167 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH through the middle51%−3.5−0.4+0.1−3.8±2.6
FH crosscourt25%−0.2−1.0−0.8−2.1±4.2
FH down the line24%−1.8−0.3+3.7+1.6±4.5

Lean FH down the line: +3.7±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (84 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH crosscourt49%+1.0+0.7−0.2+1.6±2.9
BH through the middle33%−2.9+1.8+2.0+0.8±2.1
BH down the line19%−0.2+1.4+4.2+5.4±4.6

Lean BH down the line: +3.3±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (80 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Nicolas Jarry returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JonasValue
FH through the middle61%+4.3+3.0+0.4+7.7±2.4
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+3.0+3.5+12.0±4.2
FH down the line13%+1.7+0.2+0.8+2.6±4.4
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−0.3−1.0−5.5±2.1
BH through the middle1%+6.6+0.6+0.1+7.3±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (680 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JonasValue
BH through the middle51%+6.4+2.5+0.1+9.1±2.3
BH crosscourt28%+8.8+0.9−0.4+9.3±3.2
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.9+0.9−4.2±2.5
BH down the line7%+4.2+6.5−2.3+8.5±4.6
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5+0.3−0.4+0.5±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.9±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (773 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JonasValue
FH through the middle65%−3.5−0.7−0.4−4.5±2.8
FH crosscourt23%−0.2+2.1−2.1−0.2±4.3
FH down the line12%−1.8−3.0−0.7−5.5±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.4±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (149 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JonasValue
BH through the middle57%−2.9−2.0−0.3−5.2±2.1
BH crosscourt30%+1.0+0.7−1.0+0.7±3.0
BH down the line5%−0.2+0.1−3.0−3.1±4.9
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.1−0.4−3.2±2.4
FH inside-in2%+0.6+0.5−2.1−1.0±4.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.8±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (617 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Jonas Bjorkman

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+5.8±5.6+3.3+2.5
BH to their forehand · return +1+5.3±6.5+2.9+2.3
BH to their forehand · return+5.2±6.7−0.1+5.3
FH to their backhand · rally+4.8±5.0+2.1+2.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1+1.8±4.8−0.4+2.2
BH to the middle · return+1.5±3.5−1.1+2.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−7.4±6.6−3.0−4.4
BH to their backhand · return +1−6.8±5.3−5.0−1.8
BH to their forehand · rally−6.5±6.0−4.8−1.7
BH to the middle · serve +1−3.0±3.8−1.3−1.7
FH to their backhand · return−2.6±6.1−2.1−0.4

Nicolas Jarry

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+6.4±5.2+1.1+5.3
FH to the middle · return+4.4±3.7+2.4+2.0
FH to their forehand · return+2.9±6.5+0.2+2.6
BH to their backhand · return+0.9±5.0−0.7+1.7
BH slice to the middle · return+0.5±2.9−0.9+1.3
BH to their forehand · return +1+0.5±7.2−1.2+1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1−11.6±5.4−8.9−2.8
FH to their backhand · return +1−8.0±6.3−6.6−1.4
FH to their backhand · rally−6.6±5.1−7.0+0.4
BH to their forehand · rally−5.1±6.0−7.1+2.0
FH to their forehand · return +1−3.7±6.0−6.4+2.6

Against Nicolas Jarry-like opponents

Jonas Bjorkman vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.6%30.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jiri Lehecka, Arthur Rinderknech, Denis Shapovalov, Zizou Bergs, Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard, Reilly Opelka, Gabriel Diallo, Aslan Karatsev, Vasek Pospisil, Sam Querrey. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.