RallyIQ

Game plan

Kei Nishikori v Roman Safiullin

Every number combines what Kei Nishikori does well with what Roman Safiullin allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Kei Nishikori wins, best of 3 73%90%: 46%–91% · best of 5: 78%
Serve points won 63.5% / 58.7% Kei / Roman · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 78%serve 64.9% / 58.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Kei Nishikori's record against Roman Safiullin's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −6.7 on serve, +0.2 on return vs expectation (799 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerKeiRoman
Direction choice+0.06 ±0.05
better than 73%
+0.11 ±0.07
better than 83%
Shot selection−0.30 ±0.07
better than 23%
+0.42 ±0.20
better than 88%
Execution−0.05 ±0.28
better than 66%
−0.74 ±0.73
better than 35%
Points left on the table2.29 ±0.07
lower than 85%
2.11 ±0.16
lower than 98%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Kei Nishikori +0.53, Roman Safiullin −0.55. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Kei Nishikori serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKei winsv RomanMatchupOptimal
Wide42%70%73%69.7%±5.742%
Body16%62%66%64.7%±9.83% ▼
T42%73%77%75.4%±5.355% ▲

Optimal v Roman Safiullin: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKei winsv RomanMatchupOptimal
Wide47%70%74%71.1%±5.747%
Body17%63%64%63.8%±10.24% ▼
T36%68%75%71.5%±6.449% ▲

Optimal v Roman Safiullin: +0.7±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Roman Safiullin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRoman winsv KeiMatchupOptimal
Wide51%70%71%68.0%±5.545% ▼
Body7%49%65%50.8%±11.60% ▼
T42%73%76%74.3%±5.855% ▲

Optimal v Kei Nishikori: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRoman winsv KeiMatchupOptimal
Wide47%75%74%76.8%±5.360% ▲
Body15%63%61%61.3%±10.52% ▼
T38%66%74%67.7%±6.338%

Optimal v Kei Nishikori: +1.3±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +5.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Kei Nishikori returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RomanValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3−1.1+0.9+4.0±2.3
FH crosscourt24%+5.5+1.1+3.0+9.5±3.9
FH down the line19%+1.7+1.2+1.2+4.1±4.0
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2+1.6−0.5−3.1±2.3
FH slice down the line3%−4.3+0.4+1.9−1.9±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.0±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1224 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RomanValue
BH crosscourt29%+8.8+1.9+0.2+10.8±3.1
BH through the middle24%+6.4−1.0+0.6+6.0±2.3
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2−1.9−0.8−6.9±2.2
BH slice crosscourt15%+0.5+1.4±0.0+1.9±2.6
BH slice down the line5%−8.4−1.3−0.5−10.2±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.7±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (1117 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RomanValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+0.4+1.3−1.7±2.5
FH down the line28%−1.8−3.1+0.9−4.0±4.5
FH crosscourt27%−0.2+1.0+2.1+2.9±4.3
FH slice down the line1%−9.4−0.3±0.0−9.8±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.1±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (423 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RomanValue
BH crosscourt47%+1.0+2.6−1.6+2.0±2.7
BH through the middle30%−2.9−0.7+0.7−2.9±2.2
BH down the line14%−0.2+2.2−0.2+1.8±4.7
FH through the middle3%−2.9−0.4+1.3−2.0±2.3
FH inside-out2%+1.0+1.4+0.9+3.2±3.5

Lean FH inside-out: +3.1±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (845 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Roman Safiullin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KeiValue
FH through the middle39%+4.3+2.3+0.7+7.3±2.3
FH crosscourt17%+5.5−0.4+0.1+5.3±3.8
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2−0.7+1.4−3.5±2.3
FH down the line10%+1.7−1.2+2.3+2.8±3.8
FH slice crosscourt10%−4.3−0.3+2.2−2.4±2.8

Lean FH through the middle: +4.4±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (282 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KeiValue
BH crosscourt40%+8.8−0.3+1.8+10.3±2.8
BH through the middle39%+6.4−1.6+0.7+5.5±2.1
BH down the line8%+4.2−0.8+2.0+5.4±4.2
BH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.5±0.0−5.7±2.1
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.2+0.7+1.0±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.9±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (323 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KeiValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.5−0.3−2.3±2.5
FH crosscourt32%−0.2−2.4−0.4−3.0±3.8
FH down the line15%−1.8−0.8+1.7−0.9±3.8
FH slice crosscourt7%−12.5−2.2±0.0−14.7±1.3

Lean FH through the middle: +0.9±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (75 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KeiValue
BH crosscourt51%+1.0−1.7+1.3+0.6±2.6
BH through the middle38%−2.9−1.5+1.1−3.3±2.1
BH down the line10%−0.2+0.4−0.5−0.3±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.6±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (175 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Kei Nishikori

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+5.6±3.7+2.5+3.0
FH to their backhand · rally+3.4±2.0−0.3+3.7
BH to their forehand · rally+2.7±3.2+2.8−0.1
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.9±3.5+0.8+1.0
BH to their forehand · return+1.8±4.1+2.0−0.2
BH to their backhand · rally+1.2±1.6+0.3+0.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · rally−2.3±2.2−3.0+0.7
FH to their forehand · rally−2.1±2.0−2.6+0.5
BH to their backhand · return +1−1.8±2.8−0.6−1.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1−1.0±2.6−1.8+0.7
FH to their forehand · return +1−1.0±3.5−0.9−0.1

Roman Safiullin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return+3.9±2.0+2.9+1.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.3±2.5+2.2+1.1
FH to their forehand · return +1+1.8±3.6+0.1+1.7
FH to the middle · return +1+1.6±2.4+1.3+0.3
FH to the middle · rally+1.3±1.8+1.7−0.4
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.1±3.4+0.4+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1−5.1±4.5−1.5−3.6
BH to their backhand · rally−2.9±1.6−3.0+0.1
FH to their forehand · rally−2.1±2.1−1.6−0.5
FH to their forehand · return−1.9±3.7−1.7−0.1
BH to the middle · rally−1.8±1.5−0.8−0.9

Against Roman Safiullin-like opponents

Kei Nishikori vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.9%37.6%
Players most similar to Roman Safiullin4 56.6%38.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Arthur Fils, Tommy Paul, Alexander Shevchenko, Zizou Bergs, Laslo Djere, Marin Cilic, Fabio Fognini, Otto Virtanen, Lloyd Harris, Gregoire Barrere. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.