RallyIQ

Game plan

Nick Kyrgios v Borna Coric

Every number combines what Nick Kyrgios does well with what Borna Coric allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Nick Kyrgios wins, best of 3 57%90%: 35%–76% · best of 5: 58%
Serve points won 69.4% / 68.0% Nick / Borna · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 58%serve 69.6% / 67.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Nick Kyrgios's record against Borna Coric's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.8 on serve, −0.8 on return vs expectation (700 points); head-to-head: −10.6 on serve, −0.5 on return vs expectation (154 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerNickBorna
Direction choice−0.04 ±0.06
better than 46%
+0.17 ±0.06
better than 91%
Shot selection−0.09 ±0.06
better than 41%
−0.12 ±0.13
better than 37%
Execution+0.99 ±0.32
better than 95%
−0.53 ±0.35
better than 43%
Points left on the table2.66 ±0.12
lower than 44%
2.25 ±0.10
lower than 88%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Nick Kyrgios −0.65, Borna Coric −0.12. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Nick Kyrgios serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNick winsv BornaMatchupOptimal
Wide38%77%78%81.4%±2.851% ▲
Body3%62%56%55.5%±10.40% ▼
T59%83%76%84.2%±2.649% ▼

Optimal v Borna Coric: +0.5±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNick winsv BornaMatchupOptimal
Wide46%79%76%81.4%±3.059% ▲
Body5%59%59%55.2%±9.60% ▼
T49%75%74%76.7%±3.541% ▼

Optimal v Borna Coric: +0.6±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Borna Coric serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBorna winsv NickMatchupOptimal
Wide42%71%81%80.3%±3.055% ▲
Body5%58%65%59.3%±8.60% ▼
T52%73%78%76.3%±3.245% ▼

Optimal v Nick Kyrgios: +1.0±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBorna winsv NickMatchupOptimal
Wide49%73%80%80.1%±3.142% ▼
Body6%59%70%66.1%±8.00% ▼
T45%72%74%74.2%±3.658% ▲

Optimal v Nick Kyrgios: +0.3±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Nick Kyrgios returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.9−0.6+4.6±1.7
FH down the line19%+1.7+1.6−2.1+1.1±3.5
FH crosscourt13%+5.5+2.3−0.8+7.0±3.6
FH slice through the middle12%−4.2+2.2+1.3−0.7±2.1
FH slice down the line4%−4.3+3.5+0.9+0.1±3.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.6±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (1842 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+2.4+0.5+9.3±1.7
BH crosscourt27%+8.8+2.1−1.6+9.3±2.6
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2+1.3+0.2−2.6±2.0
BH down the line7%+4.2+0.4−0.9+3.7±4.4
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5+0.2+0.9+1.6±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +3.0±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1682 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
FH through the middle53%−3.5+0.1−0.1−3.5±2.2
FH down the line20%−1.8+1.5−1.0−1.4±4.5
FH crosscourt17%−0.2+1.4−0.7+0.5±4.2
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7+0.5+0.5−11.7±2.0
BH through the middle2%+0.1+0.8+0.6+1.5±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.1±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (593 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
BH crosscourt38%+1.0+1.3+0.6+2.9±2.2
BH through the middle38%−2.9−0.1+0.6−2.4±1.6
BH down the line15%−0.2+1.8−5.6−4.1±4.4
FH through the middle2%−2.9+0.8−0.1−2.2±2.1
FH inside-in2%+0.6−1.3−0.7−1.4±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.7±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1256 returns charted)

Borna Coric returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−1.2−0.2+2.8±1.7
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−0.9+0.7+5.2±3.5
FH down the line13%+1.7+0.2+1.5+3.4±3.7
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2−2.6+3.1−3.7±2.0
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−3.0+3.3−3.9±3.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (791 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4−1.8+1.2+5.8±1.8
BH crosscourt39%+8.8−2.2+0.6+7.3±2.6
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.2+0.8−3.6±2.0
BH down the line6%+4.2−4.0+1.1+1.3±4.3
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.3+0.4+0.6±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.4±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (704 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
FH through the middle42%−3.5−2.6+0.6−5.5±2.2
FH crosscourt35%−0.2−4.3−4.4−9.0±4.0
FH down the line21%−1.8+0.8−0.2−1.2±4.3
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−1.2−1.0−14.9±2.0

Lean FH down the line: +4.7±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (266 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NickValue
BH crosscourt56%+1.0−0.4+1.3+1.9±2.1
BH through the middle34%−2.9−1.0+1.5−2.4±1.8
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.1+3.9+3.8±4.6
FH through the middle1%−2.9+0.7+0.6−1.5±1.6

Lean BH down the line: +3.2±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (534 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Nick Kyrgios

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally+7.6±5.9+4.6+3.0
FH slice to the middle · return+2.9±2.0+1.6+1.3
FH slice to the middle · rally+2.8±2.6+0.3+2.5
BH slice to the middle · return+2.6±1.9+1.7+0.9
FH volley to their backhand · rally+2.0±5.8−0.1+2.2
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.8±2.2+1.0+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1−6.1±3.9−3.9−2.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1−4.1±3.9−2.1−2.0
BH to their forehand · return−4.1±3.3+0.5−4.6
BH slice to the middle · return +1−4.0±2.2−3.4−0.6
BH to their forehand · rally−4.0±2.4−1.5−2.4

Borna Coric

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+4.3±1.8+0.1+4.2
BH to their forehand · return +1+3.5±4.2+0.6+2.8
BH to their forehand · serve +1+3.1±3.8−1.7+4.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1+1.3±1.8−0.5+1.8
FH to their backhand · return+0.8±2.9−0.1+0.9
FH to their forehand · rally+0.7±1.5−1.2+1.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−3.9±3.1−2.5−1.4
FH volley to their forehand · rally−3.7±5.7+0.7−4.4
BH slice to the middle · rally−3.5±1.8−2.0−1.5
FH to their forehand · return +1−3.1±2.8−3.6+0.5
FH slice to the middle · rally−2.9±2.6−1.2−1.8

Against Borna Coric-like opponents

Nick Kyrgios vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–69.6%31.7%
Players most similar to Borna Coric4 69.0%31.3%
Borna Coric (charted head-to-head)1 59.0%31.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Andrey Rublev, Sebastian Korda, Jack Draper, Karen Khachanov, Taylor Fritz, Laslo Djere, David Goffin, Juan Martin Del Potro, Nicolas Almagro, Nikolay Davydenko. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head