RallyIQ

Game plan

Pedro Martinez v Cristian Garin

Every number combines what Pedro Martinez does well with what Cristian Garin allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Pedro Martinez wins, best of 3 33%90%: 12%–61% · best of 5: 29%
Serve points won 58.0% / 61.5% Pedro / Cristian · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 32%serve 58.4% / 62.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Pedro Martinez's record against Cristian Garin's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −2.2 on serve, +3.4 on return vs expectation (746 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerPedroCristian
Direction choice−0.06 ±0.08
better than 43%
−0.02 ±0.12
better than 51%
Shot selection−0.06 ±0.23
better than 46%
+0.48 ±0.19
better than 90%
Execution+0.23 ±0.43
better than 77%
−0.81 ±0.50
better than 32%
Points left on the table2.66 ±0.12
lower than 43%
2.40 ±0.21
lower than 73%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Pedro Martinez +1.75, Cristian Garin +1.00. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Pedro Martinez serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPedro winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide41%65%70%61.9%±6.354% ▲
Body11%59%64%59.4%±11.10% ▼
T48%68%74%66.1%±5.846% ▼

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.3±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPedro winsv CristianMatchupOptimal
Wide54%63%74%65.0%±5.954%
Body16%59%61%57.0%±11.63% ▼
T30%62%71%61.2%±7.443% ▲

Optimal v Cristian Garin: +0.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Cristian Garin serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCristian winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide37%66%75%68.5%±6.034% ▼
Body11%56%70%62.4%±10.90% ▼
T53%75%76%76.3%±5.266% ▲

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCristian winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide62%65%71%63.9%±6.055% ▼
Body9%62%56%55.7%±11.63% ▼
T29%69%73%70.6%±6.742% ▲

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Pedro Martinez returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3+2.1+0.3+6.7±2.5
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+1.1+4.1+10.8±4.3
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2+1.7+0.7−1.8±2.4
FH down the line12%+1.7+1.9−1.1+2.5±4.5
FH slice crosscourt8%−4.3+0.6+1.3−2.4±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.8±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (426 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+2.2+2.6+11.1±2.2
BH crosscourt27%+8.8−3.4+1.5+6.9±3.1
BH down the line13%+4.2−0.4+0.6+4.4±4.6
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.5+1.3−4.4±2.5
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−1.5−1.3−2.3±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +5.1±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (517 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5+1.2+1.0−1.2±2.6
FH crosscourt37%−0.2−0.4−0.1−0.8±4.4
FH down the line10%−1.8+0.6+3.5+2.3±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: −0.1±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (107 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CristianValue
BH through the middle41%−2.9−0.2+1.1−2.0±2.2
BH crosscourt30%+1.0±0.0+1.2+2.1±3.2
BH down the line14%−0.2+5.2−4.1+0.9±5.0
FH inside-out7%+1.0−0.7+3.5+3.8±3.6
FH through the middle5%−2.9−0.7+1.0−2.6±2.0

Lean FH inside-out: +3.6±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (340 returns charted)

Cristian Garin returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
FH through the middle54%+4.3+0.7+1.7+6.7±2.3
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−0.2+6.1+11.5±4.1
FH down the line13%+1.7−2.1+1.6+1.2±4.4
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+0.1+1.7−2.4±2.2
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3−0.2+0.1−4.3±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.7±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (416 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
BH through the middle54%+6.4+1.5+1.6+9.5±2.0
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.6+1.7+8.9±2.9
BH down the line10%+4.2−3.0+4.4+5.6±4.6
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2+0.4−1.4−5.2±2.5
BH slice crosscourt1%+0.5−1.3−2.2−3.0±2.4

Lean BH through the middle: +1.7±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (486 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
FH through the middle54%−3.5+1.2+1.2−1.0±2.7
FH crosscourt33%−0.2−0.9−1.6−2.7±4.3
FH down the line14%−1.8+2.0−1.7−1.5±4.3

Lean FH through the middle: +0.6±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (95 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
BH through the middle43%−2.9+0.3+1.0−1.6±2.2
BH crosscourt36%+1.0+1.2+1.2+3.4±2.8
BH down the line8%−0.2+3.1−0.8+2.1±5.0
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.7+1.2−0.9±2.3
FH inside-out3%+1.0−2.0−1.7−2.7±3.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.8±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (446 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Pedro Martinez

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · rally+4.9±1.6+3.5+1.4
BH to their forehand · rally+4.9±3.2+3.9+0.9
FH to their forehand · rally+4.4±2.1+2.6+1.8
FH to the middle · return +1+4.3±2.5+3.1+1.2
BH to the middle · return+4.3±1.7+1.5+2.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.8±3.0+2.2+1.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return−1.2±4.1+0.8−2.0
BH slice to their backhand · rally−0.7±1.9−0.1−0.6
BH slice to the middle · rally−0.7±2.1−0.4−0.3
FH to their backhand · rally−0.3±2.0+0.6−0.8
BH to their backhand · rally±0.0±1.6+1.5−1.4

Cristian Garin

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+4.6±4.8−2.9+7.5
BH to the middle · return+4.4±1.6+1.1+3.3
FH to their forehand · return+4.0±3.9+0.6+3.4
BH to their backhand · return+3.1±2.3+0.2+2.9
FH to the middle · return+3.0±1.9+1.1+2.0
BH to their forehand · return+2.7±4.2±0.0+2.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · rally−5.6±2.4−4.7−0.9
BH to their backhand · serve +1−4.7±2.7−3.2−1.5
BH slice to the middle · rally−2.9±2.3−1.7−1.2
BH to the middle · rally−1.8±1.5−2.3+0.5
BH to the middle · serve +1−1.7±2.4−1.8+0.1

Against Cristian Garin-like opponents

Pedro Martinez vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.3%34.6%
Players most similar to Cristian Garin4 56.7%37.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jannik Sinner, Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Juncheng Shang, Thiago Monteiro, Daniel Elahi Galan, Federico Delbonis, Egor Gerasimov, Pablo Cuevas, Philipp Kohlschreiber. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.