RallyIQ

Game plan

Rinky Hijikata v Radu Albot

Every number combines what Rinky Hijikata does well with what Radu Albot allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Rinky Hijikata wins, best of 3 40%90%: 14%–72% · best of 5: 38%
Serve points won 58.6% / 60.4% Rinky / Radu · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 44%serve 59.0% / 60.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Rinky Hijikata's record against Radu Albot's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −12.0 on serve, −7.4 on return vs expectation (127 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerRinkyRadu
Direction choice+0.05 ±0.09
better than 70%
−0.18 ±0.13
better than 17%
Shot selection+0.25 ±0.27
better than 75%
+0.38 ±0.16
better than 85%
Execution−0.22 ±0.71
better than 57%
−0.85 ±0.44
better than 30%
Points left on the table2.53 ±0.15
lower than 57%
2.77 ±0.28
lower than 33%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Rinky Hijikata +0.43, Radu Albot +0.41. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Rinky Hijikata serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRinky winsv RaduMatchupOptimal
Wide48%67%75%69.0%±7.661% ▲
Body8%53%59%48.6%±14.70% ▼
T43%69%76%70.3%±8.139% ▼

Optimal v Radu Albot: +0.8±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRinky winsv RaduMatchupOptimal
Wide50%77%76%79.2%±6.463% ▲
Body6%63%69%69.2%±14.60% ▼
T44%72%72%72.1%±8.237% ▼

Optimal v Radu Albot: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Radu Albot serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowRadu winsv RinkyMatchupOptimal
Wide43%69%75%71.5%±7.356% ▲
Body20%69%65%70.9%±11.620%
T37%68%71%63.7%±8.824% ▼

Optimal v Rinky Hijikata: +0.7±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowRadu winsv RinkyMatchupOptimal
Wide53%68%75%70.1%±7.956% ▲
Body16%67%58%62.8%±14.83% ▼
T31%62%74%64.6%±9.141% ▲

Optimal v Rinky Hijikata: +0.5±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Rinky Hijikata returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RaduValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3−0.6+1.9+5.5±2.7
FH crosscourt29%+5.5+1.0+1.5+8.1±4.4
FH down the line14%+1.7−1.0+3.9+4.6±4.5
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+0.8+1.9−1.5±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.2±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (222 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RaduValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+2.1+0.6+9.1±2.6
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−2.7−0.1+6.0±3.5
BH down the line12%+4.2−2.2+3.8+5.8±4.5
BH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.6+0.5−4.3±2.4
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−1.3−0.9−1.7±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +4.3±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (222 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RaduValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5+0.6+0.5−2.3±2.9
FH crosscourt36%−0.2+1.2−0.3+0.6±4.3
FH down the line14%−1.8±0.0+1.8±0.0±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.5±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (77 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RaduValue
BH through the middle39%−2.9−0.1−1.3−4.2±2.5
BH crosscourt35%+1.0+2.4±0.0+3.4±3.2
BH down the line22%−0.2+0.6−2.0−1.6±4.9
FH inside-out5%+1.0+0.5+1.8+3.2±3.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (153 returns charted)

Radu Albot returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RinkyValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3−1.8+1.1+3.6±2.8
FH down the line22%+1.7+1.0−0.7+2.0±4.5
FH crosscourt15%+5.5−1.5−0.2+3.8±4.4
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.8+0.9−4.1±1.9
FH slice down the line4%−4.3−1.6±0.0−5.8±1.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.8±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (248 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RinkyValue
BH through the middle33%+6.4−0.1+1.7+8.0±2.7
BH crosscourt29%+8.8+2.2+1.2+12.1±3.6
BH slice crosscourt13%+0.5−1.2+0.1−0.6±2.9
BH slice through the middle11%−4.2±0.0+0.1−4.1±2.4
BH down the line10%+4.2−3.0−1.9−0.6±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.9±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (269 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RinkyValue
FH through the middle56%−3.5+0.7+1.6−1.2±2.9
FH crosscourt30%−0.2−3.2+0.6−2.8±4.3
FH down the line13%−1.8−1.4−3.1−6.3±4.2

Lean FH through the middle: +1.2±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (89 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv RinkyValue
BH through the middle44%−2.9+1.2+3.3+1.7±2.5
BH crosscourt34%+1.0+0.5+3.1+4.6±3.2
BH down the line7%−0.2+1.3+1.9+3.0±4.5
FH through the middle6%−2.9+0.8+1.6−0.5±2.2
FH inside-out5%+1.0±0.0−3.1−2.2±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.3±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (199 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Rinky Hijikata

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+6.3±3.7+3.0+3.3
FH to their backhand · return+4.6±4.1+0.7+4.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.5±3.4+3.0+0.5
FH to their forehand · return+3.2±4.4+1.9+1.3
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.0±2.7+3.0±0.0
BH to the middle · return+2.1±2.2+2.0+0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−3.3±2.7−2.4−0.8
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.6±4.2−0.6−2.0
FH to their backhand · return +1−2.4±4.0−3.3+0.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1−2.3±3.3−0.9−1.4
FH to the middle · rally−2.2±2.2−2.4+0.2

Radu Albot

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return+4.3±3.0+1.8+2.5
FH to their backhand · return +1+3.5±4.1+4.5−0.9
BH to the middle · return+3.0±2.2+0.3+2.8
BH slice to their backhand · rally+2.3±2.5+0.8+1.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.3±3.7+1.2+1.1
BH to their backhand · return +1+2.1±3.4+1.3+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−3.6±2.8−1.6−2.0
FH to their forehand · return−3.1±4.5−3.4+0.3
FH to their backhand · return−3.1±4.0−0.8−2.4
BH to their backhand · serve +1−1.3±3.4−1.2−0.1
FH to their forehand · return +1−0.9±4.3−1.0+0.1

Against Radu Albot-like opponents

Rinky Hijikata vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–59.6%35.2%
Players most similar to Radu Albot1 48.2%25.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Casper Ruud, Stefanos Tsitsipas, Ben Shelton, Tommy Paul, Marcos Giron, Guy Den Ouden, Francisco Cerundolo, Daniel Elahi Galan, Ilya Ivashka, Tommy Robredo. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.