RallyIQ

Game plan

Taylor Townsend v Barbora Strycova

Every number combines what Taylor Townsend does well with what Barbora Strycova allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Taylor Townsend wins, best of 3 49%90%: 16%–83% · best of 5: 49%
Serve points won 57.9% / 58.1% Taylor / Barbora · tour 58.1%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 51%serve 57.8% / 57.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Taylor Townsend's record against Barbora Strycova's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.0 on serve, −10.7 on return vs expectation (144 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerTaylorBarbora
Direction choice+0.03 ±0.07
better than 60%
±0.00 ±0.10
better than 53%
Shot selection+0.29 ±0.38
better than 78%
−0.31 ±0.25
better than 21%
Execution−0.66 ±0.65
better than 28%
−0.18 ±0.48
better than 52%
Points left on the table3.14 ±0.14
lower than 6%
2.69 ±0.11
lower than 35%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Taylor Townsend serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowTaylor winsv BarboraMatchupOptimal
Wide36%64%69%67.2%±8.751% ▲
Body24%55%61%58.7%±10.68% ▼
T41%65%65%61.9%±8.741%

Optimal v Barbora Strycova: +0.4±1.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowTaylor winsv BarboraMatchupOptimal
Wide44%69%65%68.4%±8.459% ▲
Body16%58%61%62.8%±11.57% ▼
T40%62%61%58.1%±9.634% ▼

Optimal v Barbora Strycova: +0.6±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Barbora Strycova serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBarbora winsv TaylorMatchupOptimal
Wide35%67%67%68.4%±8.450% ▲
Body25%59%54%56.0%±10.510% ▼
T40%70%73%74.2%±8.240%

Optimal v Taylor Townsend: +1.0±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBarbora winsv TaylorMatchupOptimal
Wide33%69%70%72.8%±8.848% ▲
Body22%52%64%60.8%±11.38% ▼
T45%57%64%56.4%±8.644%

Optimal v Taylor Townsend: +0.7±1.1 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +10.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Taylor Townsend returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BarboraValue
FH through the middle31%+4.2−1.2+3.1+6.1±3.0
FH slice through the middle25%−6.7−0.2−0.7−7.7±2.5
FH crosscourt19%+5.3+1.9+3.0+10.2±4.3
FH slice crosscourt16%−6.6+2.4+1.3−2.9±2.4
FH down the line8%+1.5−2.5+1.2+0.3±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +8.7±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (190 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BarboraValue
BH through the middle30%+6.0−0.2+1.0+6.8±2.8
BH slice through the middle21%−6.2+2.4+0.9−2.9±2.4
BH crosscourt20%+7.7−3.2−2.5+2.0±3.6
BH down the line14%+2.2±0.0−1.8+0.4±4.7
BH slice crosscourt9%−4.2+0.1−0.7−4.8±2.5

Lean BH through the middle: +5.9±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (385 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BarboraValue
FH crosscourt49%+0.5+2.0+2.0+4.6±4.1
FH through the middle34%−3.2−0.1+2.7−0.6±2.9
FH down the line17%−0.6−1.2+1.8±0.0±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.5±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (41 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BarboraValue
BH through the middle47%−2.6−0.4−0.4−3.4±2.7
BH crosscourt37%+1.5−3.4−0.4−2.3±3.7
BH down the line11%−0.5+0.2−2.8−3.1±4.9
FH through the middle6%−2.7−1.0+2.7−0.9±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +0.5±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (150 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Barbora Strycova returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TaylorValue
FH slice through the middle37%−6.7+3.5+0.6−2.6±2.6
FH through the middle32%+4.2+0.4−1.3+3.3±3.0
FH crosscourt13%+5.3−0.8±0.0+4.6±4.2
FH slice crosscourt9%−6.6+2.2+1.2−3.2±2.5
FH slice down the line5%−10.5+0.3+0.1−10.2±2.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.5±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (187 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TaylorValue
BH through the middle33%+6.0+2.9−1.1+7.8±2.7
BH slice through the middle29%−6.2+1.4−1.2−6.0±2.5
BH crosscourt15%+7.7+2.3+0.9+10.9±3.5
BH slice crosscourt10%−4.2+1.5+0.2−2.4±2.5
BH down the line8%+2.2+3.4−0.2+5.3±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.9±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (164 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TaylorValue
FH through the middle57%−3.2+1.1+0.4−1.7±3.0
FH crosscourt19%+0.5+1.1+0.8+2.5±4.0
FH down the line14%−0.6+3.1+2.6+5.1±4.6
FH slice through the middle10%−15.2+1.2±0.0−14.0±1.1

Lean FH through the middle: −0.6±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (63 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TaylorValue
BH crosscourt45%+1.5−1.1−0.2+0.2±3.5
BH through the middle45%−2.6±0.0−0.3−2.9±2.6
BH down the line10%−0.5+0.9+1.2+1.5±3.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.3±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (49 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Taylor Townsend

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+9.4±6.3+4.7+4.7
BH to their forehand · return +1+6.4±6.0+1.7+4.7
BH to their forehand · rally+2.9±6.2+0.3+2.6
FH to the middle · rally+2.4±3.9+1.1+1.3
FH to the middle · return+1.3±3.8−2.2+3.5
BH to the middle · return+0.5±3.7+0.5±0.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1−7.8±5.6−6.0−1.8
BH to their backhand · return−6.3±4.7−2.3−4.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1−5.5±6.1−0.9−4.6
BH to their forehand · return−5.3±6.3−0.9−4.4
BH to the middle · rally−2.4±3.4−1.4−1.0

Barbora Strycova

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+5.7±5.9+2.4+3.4
FH to their forehand · return+4.7±6.2+2.3+2.3
BH to their forehand · rally+3.7±6.7+0.7+3.1
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.4±6.2+2.8−0.3
FH to their backhand · rally+2.1±5.6+1.8+0.4
FH to the middle · return +1+2.0±4.0+0.9+1.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−6.2±4.9−3.0−3.2
BH to the middle · serve +1−1.8±3.4−1.5−0.3
FH to the middle · rally−1.4±3.8+0.2−1.7
FH to the middle · serve +1−1.1±3.5−2.0+0.9
BH to the middle · rally−0.7±3.5−0.7±0.0

Against Barbora Strycova-like opponents

Taylor Townsend vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–57.2%40.8%
Players most similar to Barbora Strycova1 57.7%28.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Karolina Muchova, Caty Mcnally, Elina Svitolina, Jessica Pegula, Jaqueline Cristian, Maria Sakkari, Ana Bogdan, Anna Lena Friedsam, Alison Van Uytvanck, R. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.