RallyIQ

Game plan

Thomas Johansson v Nicolas Jarry

Every number combines what Thomas Johansson does well with what Nicolas Jarry allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Thomas Johansson wins, best of 3 60%90%: 39%–78% · best of 5: 62%
Serve points won 68.5% / 66.5% Thomas / Nicolas · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 60%serve 68.5% / 66.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Thomas Johansson's record against Nicolas Jarry's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerThomasNicolas
Direction choice+0.21 ±0.10
better than 95%
−0.23 ±0.09
better than 9%
Shot selection−0.32 ±0.24
better than 21%
+0.02 ±0.14
better than 54%
Execution−0.41 ±0.55
better than 48%
−0.45 ±0.54
better than 46%
Points left on the table2.34 ±0.29
lower than 80%
3.09 ±0.16
lower than 16%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Thomas Johansson serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowThomas winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide57%76%76%78.2%±4.970% ▲
Body4%57%67%61.0%±13.60% ▼
T40%81%73%79.3%±6.730% ▼

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowThomas winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide50%75%76%78.2%±5.942% ▼
Body5%65%68%69.7%±12.50% ▼
T45%79%76%82.9%±5.358% ▲

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Nicolas Jarry serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv ThomasMatchupOptimal
Wide43%74%74%74.6%±5.656% ▲
Body6%64%57%57.3%±12.90% ▼
T51%74%74%73.4%±6.144% ▼

Optimal v Thomas Johansson: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv ThomasMatchupOptimal
Wide55%75%78%80.0%±5.467% ▲
Body8%67%60%64.1%±12.30% ▼
T38%75%76%78.4%±5.533% ▼

Optimal v Thomas Johansson: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Thomas Johansson returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3−0.7+2.6+6.2±2.6
FH down the line28%+1.7+1.7−1.6+1.8±4.5
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−1.7−0.7+3.1±4.4
FH slice through the middle7%−4.2−0.8+1.5−3.5±2.0
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−2.0+1.6−4.7±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +2.8±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (261 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH through the middle37%+6.4−0.9+3.5+9.0±2.3
BH crosscourt29%+8.8−1.0+1.5+9.3±3.3
BH slice crosscourt13%+0.5+1.0−0.4+1.1±3.0
BH down the line11%+4.2+0.8+6.3+11.3±4.5
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2−2.7+1.2−5.7±2.1

Lean BH down the line: +4.7±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (214 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH down the line43%−1.8+1.2+3.7+3.1±4.7
FH through the middle40%−3.5+0.4+0.1−3.0±2.6
FH crosscourt17%−0.2+0.2−0.8−0.9±4.0

Lean FH down the line: +3.1±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (75 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH through the middle48%−2.9−2.0+2.0−3.0±2.1
BH crosscourt43%+1.0−0.6−0.2+0.3±3.0
BH down the line9%−0.2−0.4+4.2+3.6±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.2±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (117 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Nicolas Jarry returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThomasValue
FH through the middle61%+4.3+3.0−0.6+6.6±2.5
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+3.0−2.5+6.0±4.2
FH down the line13%+1.7+0.2−0.6+1.3±4.4
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−0.3+1.7−2.8±2.3
BH through the middle1%+6.6+0.6±0.0+7.1±2.3

Lean FH through the middle: +1.3±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (680 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThomasValue
BH through the middle51%+6.4+2.5±0.0+8.9±2.4
BH crosscourt28%+8.8+0.9−1.4+8.3±3.2
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.9+1.3−3.8±2.5
BH down the line7%+4.2+6.5−0.2+10.5±4.4
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5+0.3−0.1+0.7±2.9

Lean BH down the line: +3.3±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (773 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThomasValue
FH through the middle65%−3.5−0.7−0.9−5.0±2.8
FH crosscourt23%−0.2+2.1+2.3+4.2±4.3
FH down the line12%−1.8−3.0+1.2−3.6±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.0±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (149 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ThomasValue
BH through the middle57%−2.9−2.0+1.1−3.8±2.1
BH crosscourt30%+1.0+0.7+1.8+3.5±2.9
BH down the line5%−0.2+0.1−2.5−2.7±4.9
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.1−0.9−3.7±2.4
FH inside-in2%+0.6+0.5+2.3+3.4±4.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.9±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (617 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Thomas Johansson

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+6.6±5.4+2.0+4.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1+4.5±3.9−0.7+5.1
BH to the middle · return+3.2±2.6−1.2+4.4
BH slice to their backhand · rally+2.3±3.5+3.1−0.8
FH to the middle · return+1.5±3.1−1.0+2.5
BH to their backhand · rally+1.5±2.8+0.4+1.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−5.5±5.7−4.5−0.9
BH to their forehand · serve +1−3.9±6.7−2.5−1.5
FH to their backhand · return +1−3.4±5.9−2.1−1.4
FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.3±4.7−0.8−2.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.5±5.3−2.9+0.4

Nicolas Jarry

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+5.5±6.0+5.1+0.4
BH to their forehand · return+5.0±6.6+10.2−5.2
BH slice to the middle · return+2.3±3.6+0.1+2.2
BH to their backhand · return+2.0±3.9+1.3+0.6
FH to the middle · return+1.2±3.2+1.9−0.7
BH to the middle · return−1.5±2.8−0.1−1.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · rally−9.2±2.9−7.2−1.9
BH to their backhand · serve +1−7.9±4.2−7.0−0.9
FH to their forehand · return +1−7.8±5.7−4.3−3.4
BH slice to their backhand · rally−7.6±3.5−7.7±0.0
FH to their backhand · rally−7.2±3.6−5.5−1.7

Against Nicolas Jarry-like opponents

Thomas Johansson vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–63.7%34.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jiri Lehecka, Arthur Rinderknech, Denis Shapovalov, Zizou Bergs, Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard, Reilly Opelka, Gabriel Diallo, Aslan Karatsev, Vasek Pospisil, Sam Querrey. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.