RallyIQ

Game plan

Tommy Robredo v Jannik Sinner

Every number combines what Tommy Robredo does well with what Jannik Sinner allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Tommy Robredo wins, best of 3 5%90%: 1%–14% · best of 5: 2%
Serve points won 52.8% / 65.7% Tommy / Jannik · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 5%serve 53.0% / 65.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Tommy Robredo's record against Jannik Sinner's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −3.0 on serve, +4.5 on return vs expectation (160 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerTommyJannik
Direction choice−0.20 ±0.15
better than 15%
−0.07 ±0.02
better than 40%
Shot selection−0.06 ±0.19
better than 47%
+0.50 ±0.04
better than 93%
Execution−0.15 ±0.50
better than 60%
+0.25 ±0.16
better than 78%
Points left on the table2.83 ±0.23
lower than 28%
2.38 ±0.04
lower than 75%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Tommy Robredo serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowTommy winsv JannikMatchupOptimal
Wide46%70%68%65.2%±5.046%
Body17%59%58%53.6%±7.14% ▼
T37%71%72%68.2%±5.750% ▲

Optimal v Jannik Sinner: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowTommy winsv JannikMatchupOptimal
Wide55%64%69%60.3%±4.742% ▼
Body15%61%59%57.7%±8.114%
T31%65%66%58.5%±6.044% ▲

Optimal v Jannik Sinner: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jannik Sinner serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJannik winsv TommyMatchupOptimal
Wide46%78%76%80.5%±3.859% ▲
Body11%67%61%65.4%±9.40% ▼
T43%78%79%81.6%±3.941% ▼

Optimal v Tommy Robredo: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJannik winsv TommyMatchupOptimal
Wide58%76%72%75.7%±4.152% ▼
Body7%68%60%64.9%±10.10% ▼
T35%76%69%73.6%±5.348% ▲

Optimal v Tommy Robredo: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Tommy Robredo returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JannikValue
FH through the middle36%+4.3−2.0−1.6+0.6±2.1
FH crosscourt22%+5.5−3.2−1.6+0.7±3.4
FH down the line16%+1.7−3.5−4.4−6.2±3.6
FH slice through the middle14%−4.2+0.2−1.1−5.1±1.9
FH slice crosscourt8%−4.3+2.0−2.5−4.9±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.7±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (318 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JannikValue
BH through the middle27%+6.4+2.6−0.8+8.2±2.0
BH slice through the middle23%−4.2+0.9−3.3−6.6±1.9
BH crosscourt19%+8.8−2.4−1.2+5.2±2.7
BH slice crosscourt13%+0.5+0.7−4.0−2.8±2.5
BH down the line10%+4.2+0.9−2.8+2.3±3.7

Lean BH through the middle: +8.0±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (398 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JannikValue
FH crosscourt35%−0.2+1.4−1.6−0.4±3.4
FH through the middle30%−3.5±0.0−1.0−4.4±2.1
FH down the line22%−1.8+2.5−3.0−2.4±3.4
FH slice through the middle14%−12.7−1.1−0.5−14.3±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.5±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (88 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JannikValue
BH through the middle30%−2.9−0.7−0.5−4.1±1.8
BH crosscourt20%+1.0−1.6−2.0−2.6±2.4
FH inside-out17%+1.0+1.6−3.0−0.4±3.0
FH through the middle15%−2.9+0.8−1.0−3.1±1.8
FH inside-in8%+0.6−0.4−1.6−1.4±3.4

Lean FH inside-out: +2.7±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (359 returns charted)

Jannik Sinner returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
FH through the middle57%+4.3+1.3+2.8+8.4±1.9
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+0.2−0.8+5.0±3.3
FH down the line16%+1.7−0.1+1.2+2.8±3.3
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2−4.2+1.4−7.0±2.3
FH slice crosscourt1%−4.3−1.8+2.2−3.9±2.6

Lean FH through the middle: +2.2±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (5521 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+0.1−0.2+6.4±1.7
BH crosscourt29%+8.8−0.6+1.3+9.5±2.2
BH down the line10%+4.2+0.3−0.3+4.2±3.8
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−6.9+0.5−10.6±2.0
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−7.2+3.9−2.8±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.1±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (5508 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
FH through the middle58%−3.5+0.5−3.4−6.4±2.2
FH crosscourt24%−0.2+0.5+3.9+4.2±3.7
FH down the line18%−1.8−1.3+0.2−2.8±4.1
BH through the middle0%+0.1+0.6−0.6+0.1±1.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.4±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (1459 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
BH through the middle45%−2.9+0.6−0.6−2.9±1.8
BH crosscourt43%+1.0−0.4−0.6+0.1±2.2
BH down the line7%−0.2+1.3+1.4+2.5±4.5
FH through the middle3%−2.9±0.0−3.4−6.3±2.4
FH inside-in1%+0.6+0.2+3.9+4.6±4.4

Lean FH inside-in: +5.8±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (3318 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Tommy Robredo

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+1.6±4.4+0.9+0.6
FH to their forehand · rally+1.2±2.7+1.6−0.4
BH slice to the middle · rally+1.1±2.6+2.8−1.7
FH to the middle · return +1+0.1±2.9+0.3−0.2
FH to their backhand · rally+0.1±2.4+0.3−0.2
BH to their backhand · return +1−0.1±3.5+1.1−1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−6.0±3.0−5.6−0.4
BH to their backhand · return−5.5±3.0−3.3−2.2
FH to their backhand · return−4.2±3.8−1.6−2.7
BH to their forehand · return−4.2±5.2−2.6−1.6
BH to the middle · serve +1−4.1±2.6−2.1−1.9

Jannik Sinner

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.8±3.4+1.3+1.5
FH to the middle · return+1.9±2.4+0.7+1.2
FH to their forehand · return+1.6±4.7+1.6±0.0
BH to their forehand · return +1+1.5±5.5+2.5−1.0
BH to their forehand · return+1.2±5.0+1.7−0.5
BH to their forehand · rally+0.9±4.1+2.6−1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · return−4.4±3.2−7.3+2.9
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.9±3.3−2.0−1.9
FH to the middle · return +1−3.6±3.0+0.1−3.7
FH to the middle · rally−3.3±2.2−1.0−2.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1−3.1±5.9+0.4−3.5

Against Jannik Sinner-like opponents

Tommy Robredo vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.3%34.3%
Players most similar to Jannik Sinner1 59.2%43.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Marcos Giron, Taylor Fritz, Arthur Cazaux, Luca Nardi, Cristian Garin, Ilya Ivashka, Andreas Seppi, Tennys Sandgren. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.