RallyIQ

Game plan

Yoshihito Nishioka v Benoit Paire

Every number combines what Yoshihito Nishioka does well with what Benoit Paire allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Yoshihito Nishioka wins, best of 3 43%90%: 27%–59% · best of 5: 41%
Serve points won 58.4% / 59.9% Yoshihito / Benoit · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 38%serve 57.8% / 60.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Yoshihito Nishioka's record against Benoit Paire's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.6 on serve, +0.2 on return vs expectation (230 points); head-to-head: +9.8 on serve, +5.2 on return vs expectation (122 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerYoshihitoBenoit
Direction choice−0.29 ±0.10
better than 6%
−0.04 ±0.08
better than 46%
Shot selection−0.18 ±0.14
better than 32%
−0.01 ±0.17
better than 52%
Execution+0.62 ±0.43
better than 87%
−1.09 ±0.52
better than 23%
Points left on the table3.00 ±0.19
lower than 19%
2.88 ±0.17
lower than 25%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Yoshihito Nishioka serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv BenoitMatchupOptimal
Wide25%62%73%62.0%±6.331% ▲
Body22%57%63%56.5%±8.89% ▼
T53%61%74%60.0%±5.260% ▲

Optimal v Benoit Paire: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv BenoitMatchupOptimal
Wide55%63%71%60.9%±5.142% ▼
Body16%60%62%59.6%±9.016%
T29%75%72%75.0%±5.342% ▲

Optimal v Benoit Paire: +0.7±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +10.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Benoit Paire serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBenoit winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide52%76%79%81.3%±3.665% ▲
Body5%65%55%56.0%±11.60% ▼
T43%77%80%81.6%±4.135% ▼

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBenoit winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide65%74%78%79.7%±4.158% ▼
Body6%61%62%60.0%±11.90% ▼
T29%72%77%76.4%±5.242% ▲

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Yoshihito Nishioka returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenoitValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+3.3+1.6+9.2±2.4
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+0.7+2.6+8.8±4.3
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2+2.3−0.1−1.9±2.3
FH down the line9%+1.7−0.1+2.3+3.9±4.4
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3+3.3+1.5+0.5±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +3.4±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (435 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenoitValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5+0.3+7.1±2.1
BH crosscourt22%+8.8±0.0+7.3+16.1±3.4
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2−0.6−1.1−5.9±2.2
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+1.7+2.4−4.2±3.5
BH down the line6%+4.2−4.8+1.9+1.3±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +11.3±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (612 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenoitValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5+1.5+1.5−0.4±2.4
FH crosscourt38%−0.2+0.3+1.9+1.9±4.2
FH down the line9%−1.8−1.0−2.7−5.5±4.2
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7+0.5+0.2−12.0±1.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.4±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (261 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenoitValue
BH through the middle53%−2.9+2.9+1.4+1.5±2.0
BH crosscourt29%+1.0+2.5+2.5+6.1±3.1
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.7−1.2−0.7±4.3
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3−0.5−0.6−12.4±2.2
FH through the middle3%−2.9+1.8+1.5+0.5±1.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.2±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (286 returns charted)

Benoit Paire returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3+0.3+3.3+7.9±2.0
FH down the line21%+1.7+2.4−2.0+2.1±4.1
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2+0.8+1.2−2.2±2.3
FH crosscourt11%+5.5+1.5+2.1+9.0±4.1
FH slice down the line5%−4.3+5.2+1.3+2.3±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (926 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4+2.9+4.2+13.5±1.8
BH crosscourt35%+8.8+2.7+5.0+16.6±2.8
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2±0.0+0.9−3.3±2.4
BH down the line6%+4.2+0.7+0.8+5.8±4.3
BH slice down the line3%−8.4+0.6+1.4−6.4±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.4±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (636 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−1.2+2.8−1.9±2.4
FH down the line24%−1.8+2.7−4.7−3.8±4.6
FH crosscourt23%−0.2−0.6+5.0+4.2±4.2
BH through the middle3%+0.1+0.3+0.2+0.6±1.6
BH inside-in2%+2.5+0.1+0.8+3.4±2.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (333 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH crosscourt39%+1.0+0.8+0.8+2.6±2.7
BH through the middle36%−2.9−3.7+0.2−6.4±2.1
BH down the line25%−0.2+4.9+4.3+9.0±4.8

Lean BH down the line: +8.1±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (351 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Yoshihito Nishioka

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+8.6±4.8+3.6+5.0
FH to their backhand · return+6.6±4.4+2.9+3.7
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.1±4.7+2.3+2.8
BH to their forehand · return +1+5.0±5.7+4.2+0.8
FH slice to the middle · return+4.5±3.2+2.9+1.5
FH to the middle · rally+3.2±1.8+3.4−0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−7.6±3.0−1.9−5.7
FH to their forehand · return−5.1±5.3−3.1−1.9
BH to their backhand · return−4.4±3.9−3.8−0.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1−2.8±3.3+0.3−3.1
BH slice to the middle · return−1.9±2.8−0.4−1.5

Benoit Paire

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to their backhand · rally+8.8±5.4+4.5+4.3
BH to their backhand · return+8.8±3.1+3.9+4.9
BH to the middle · return+7.0±1.7+2.0+5.0
FH to their backhand · return+6.8±3.9+2.3+4.5
BH to their forehand · return+6.4±4.1+2.0+4.3
FH to the middle · return+3.8±1.9+0.8+3.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1−9.8±3.7−5.1−4.8
FH to their forehand · serve +1−7.1±3.7−8.0+0.8
BH to their backhand · rally−5.2±2.1−3.2−2.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.7±3.5−5.5+0.8
BH slice to the middle · rally−4.6±3.0−3.4−1.2

Against Benoit Paire-like opponents

Yoshihito Nishioka vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.2%33.9%
Players most similar to Benoit Paire2 61.5%36.0%
Benoit Paire (charted head-to-head)1 67.6%42.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jakub Mensik, Hugo Gaston, Pierre Hugues Herbert, Nikoloz Basilashvili, Gregoire Barrere, Aslan Karatsev, Thomaz Bellucci, Ernests Gulbis, Mardy Fish, Gustavo Kuerten. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head