RallyIQ

Game plan

Yoshihito Nishioka v Mattia Bellucci

Every number combines what Yoshihito Nishioka does well with what Mattia Bellucci allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Yoshihito Nishioka wins, best of 3 24%90%: 6%–54% · best of 5: 19%
Serve points won 59.7% / 65.4% Yoshihito / Mattia · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 25%serve 59.8% / 65.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Yoshihito Nishioka's record against Mattia Bellucci's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.9 on serve, −10.4 on return vs expectation (96 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerYoshihitoMattia
Direction choice−0.29 ±0.10
better than 6%
−0.19 ±0.10
better than 15%
Shot selection−0.18 ±0.14
better than 32%
−0.43 ±0.21
better than 15%
Execution+0.62 ±0.43
better than 87%
−0.76 ±0.76
better than 34%
Points left on the table3.00 ±0.19
lower than 19%
3.20 ±0.21
lower than 12%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Yoshihito Nishioka serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv MattiaMatchupOptimal
Wide25%62%74%64.0%±9.238% ▲
Body22%57%64%57.3%±12.39% ▼
T53%61%81%68.8%±9.253%

Optimal v Mattia Bellucci: +0.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYoshihito winsv MattiaMatchupOptimal
Wide55%63%75%65.4%±8.855%
Body16%60%60%57.0%±13.63% ▼
T29%75%76%78.6%±7.142% ▲

Optimal v Mattia Bellucci: +0.7±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +10.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Mattia Bellucci serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMattia winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide35%76%79%81.7%±6.148% ▲
Body11%64%55%55.9%±13.40% ▼
T55%72%80%76.9%±6.152% ▼

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +1.2±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +5.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMattia winsv YoshihitoMatchupOptimal
Wide61%69%78%75.0%±6.558% ▼
Body10%68%62%67.6%±13.00% ▼
T29%74%77%78.1%±7.242% ▲

Optimal v Yoshihito Nishioka: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Yoshihito Nishioka returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MattiaValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+3.3−0.2+7.4±2.9
FH crosscourt23%+5.5+0.7−0.3+5.9±4.0
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2+2.3−2.9−4.7±2.3
FH down the line9%+1.7−0.1+3.0+4.7±4.5
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3+3.3−0.2−1.2±2.3

Lean FH through the middle: +3.6±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (435 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MattiaValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5+0.8+7.6±2.4
BH crosscourt22%+8.8±0.0−3.1+5.7±3.4
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2−0.6−0.5−5.2±2.4
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+1.7+1.3−5.3±3.1
BH down the line6%+4.2−4.8+0.7+0.1±4.6

Lean BH through the middle: +5.0±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (612 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MattiaValue
FH through the middle49%−3.5+1.5−0.4−2.3±2.8
FH crosscourt38%−0.2+0.3−0.2−0.2±4.1
FH down the line9%−1.8−1.0+1.0−1.8±4.5
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7+0.5±0.0−12.2±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.7±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (261 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MattiaValue
BH through the middle53%−2.9+2.9+0.2+0.2±2.4
BH crosscourt29%+1.0+2.5−1.1+2.4±3.1
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.7±0.0+0.6±4.9
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3−0.5±0.0−11.8±1.4
FH through the middle3%−2.9+1.8−0.4−1.5±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (286 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Mattia Bellucci returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
FH slice through the middle41%−4.2−1.7+1.2−4.7±2.4
FH through the middle23%+4.3−2.1+3.3+5.5±2.6
FH crosscourt14%+5.5+1.1−2.0+4.6±4.1
FH slice crosscourt12%−4.3+1.6+1.3−1.4±2.2
FH down the line9%+1.7−1.4+2.1+2.3±3.8

Lean FH through the middle: +5.4±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (107 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4−3.6+4.2+7.0±2.3
BH slice through the middle18%−4.2−1.0+0.9−4.3±2.4
BH crosscourt17%+8.8−1.0+0.8+8.6±3.3
BH down the line17%+4.2−0.8+5.0+8.5±4.1
BH slice down the line7%−8.4+1.2+3.2−4.0±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.8±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (161 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
FH through the middle33%−3.5+0.5+2.8−0.2±2.5
FH slice through the middle25%−12.7−1.2−0.1−14.0±1.8
FH crosscourt22%−0.2±0.0−4.7−4.9±4.0
FH down the line13%−1.8−1.6+5.0+1.6±3.8
FH slice crosscourt8%−12.5+0.9±0.0−11.6±1.3

Lean FH through the middle: +5.2±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (64 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YoshihitoValue
BH through the middle60%−2.9+0.3+0.2−2.4±2.3
BH crosscourt22%+1.0+0.2+4.3+5.6±3.1
BH down the line14%−0.2−1.3+0.8−0.8±4.0
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.7+2.8+0.6±1.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.9±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (110 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Yoshihito Nishioka

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+5.0±3.7+2.3+2.7
BH to their forehand · rally+3.8±3.3+1.5+2.3
BH to their forehand · return+3.6±4.0+3.1+0.5
BH to the middle · return+2.2±1.9+1.2+1.0
FH to their backhand · rally+2.1±2.1+1.6+0.6
BH to the middle · rally+1.4±1.9+1.1+0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.2±3.0−2.2−2.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.0±3.4+0.4−2.4
FH to their backhand · return +1−1.5±3.7−0.6−0.9
BH to their backhand · rally−1.1±2.3+0.6−1.7
FH to their forehand · rally−0.8±2.7+1.5−2.3

Mattia Bellucci

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+4.4±3.8+1.3+3.1
BH to the middle · rally+2.5±1.7+1.9+0.6
BH to their forehand · serve +1+2.1±4.5+0.9+1.2
BH to the middle · return+2.0±1.9−2.8+4.8
FH to the middle · return+1.5±2.4−1.6+3.1
FH to the middle · rally+1.5±2.0+0.7+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.7±3.5−4.1+1.4
BH to their backhand · rally−2.5±2.4−0.9−1.6
FH to their forehand · rally−1.3±3.0−1.1−0.1
BH to the middle · return +1−0.6±2.2+0.2−0.8
FH to their backhand · rally±0.0±2.5−0.4+0.4

Against Mattia Bellucci-like opponents

Yoshihito Nishioka vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.2%33.9%
Players most similar to Mattia Bellucci1 55.1%27.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Thiago Monteiro, Yannick Hanfmann, Cristian Garin, Dominik Koepfer, Federico Delbonis, Paolo Lorenzi, Gaston Gaudio. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.