The most dangerous startup decisions are rarely obviously bad ones

The most dangerous startup decisions are rarely obviously bad ones.

A big customer brings revenue. A platform gives you leverage. A new hire adds capacity. A feature helps close a deal. Scaling accelerates growth.

The problem often appears one or two decisions later.

The customer starts shaping the roadmap. The platform becomes impossible to leave. The hire institutionalizes an assumption. The cheap feature becomes a permanent obligation.

I went through Itamar Novick and Simeon Simeonov’s 75 startup anti-patterns and found a common thread: startups get trapped when reasonable decisions quietly reduce their future choices.

The interesting question isn't just “Is this a good decision?”

It’s “What path does this decision put us on?”

Discuss on LinkedIn