RallyIQ

Game plan

Albert Ramos v Gaston Gaudio

Every number combines what Albert Ramos does well with what Gaston Gaudio allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Albert Ramos wins, best of 3 38%90%: 9%–75% · best of 5: 35%
Serve points won 60.3% / 62.8% Albert / Gaston · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 32%serve 60.3% / 64.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Albert Ramos's record against Gaston Gaudio's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: ±0.0 on serve, +6.6 on return vs expectation (654 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerAlbertGaston
Direction choice+0.07 ±0.10
better than 76%
−0.11 ±0.11
better than 28%
Shot selection+0.07 ±0.17
better than 61%
−0.44 ±0.15
better than 15%
Execution+0.14 ±0.35
better than 74%
−0.18 ±0.54
better than 58%
Points left on the table2.58 ±0.15
lower than 50%
2.79 ±0.21
lower than 32%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Albert Ramos serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlbert winsv GastonMatchupOptimal
Wide31%68%66%61.2%±9.244% ▲
Body10%60%64%61.2%±15.29%
T60%61%76%63.2%±8.647% ▼

Optimal v Gaston Gaudio: +0.3±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlbert winsv GastonMatchupOptimal
Wide60%65%63%53.7%±8.247% ▼
Body8%61%65%62.7%±15.19%
T31%69%67%64.5%±9.444% ▲

Optimal v Gaston Gaudio: +0.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Gaston Gaudio serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGaston winsv AlbertMatchupOptimal
Wide33%69%74%70.1%±7.746% ▲
Body7%65%71%73.3%±11.67%
T60%63%76%64.6%±7.947% ▼

Optimal v Albert Ramos: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +6.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGaston winsv AlbertMatchupOptimal
Wide62%68%70%64.9%±7.659% ▼
Body10%55%58%50.1%±13.40% ▼
T28%69%73%70.3%±8.841% ▲

Optimal v Albert Ramos: +0.8±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Albert Ramos returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GastonValue
FH through the middle40%+4.3+1.2+1.9+7.3±2.9
FH crosscourt33%+5.5+3.8−0.4+8.9±4.3
FH down the line11%+1.7+1.2−0.3+2.6±4.5
FH slice through the middle7%−4.2−2.1−0.3−6.7±2.0
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3+0.3±0.0−4.0±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.5±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (339 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GastonValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4±0.0+0.8+7.2±2.4
BH crosscourt18%+8.8−1.5±0.0+7.3±3.5
BH slice through the middle17%−4.2−2.1+1.2−5.2±2.5
BH down the line11%+4.2+1.6−1.2+4.6±4.6
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−2.2+0.4−1.4±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.5±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (504 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GastonValue
FH crosscourt47%−0.2+0.7+1.5+2.0±4.4
FH through the middle44%−3.5±0.0−0.8−4.2±2.9
FH down the line9%−1.8+0.8±0.0−1.0±4.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.0±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (129 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GastonValue
BH through the middle42%−2.9+0.2−0.6−3.3±2.4
BH crosscourt23%+1.0−0.8−0.9−0.7±3.1
FH through the middle14%−2.9+1.2−0.8−2.4±2.5
FH inside-in8%+0.6−0.8+1.5+1.3±4.3
BH down the line7%−0.2−1.2−0.9−2.3±4.8
FH inside-out5%+1.0+0.4±0.0+1.3±3.5

Lean FH inside-out: +3.2±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (314 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Gaston Gaudio returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
FH through the middle63%+4.3+1.5−0.1+5.6±2.8
FH down the line25%+1.7+3.2−2.7+2.2±4.5
FH crosscourt13%+5.5+1.2+3.8+10.5±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.1±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (163 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
BH slice through the middle32%−4.2−1.4+0.9−4.7±2.5
BH through the middle28%+6.4−0.5+1.7+7.7±2.5
BH crosscourt19%+8.8−2.0+2.5+9.3±3.3
BH slice crosscourt11%+0.5+0.5+0.4+1.4±2.7
BH down the line6%+4.2−1.8−1.0+1.5±3.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.0±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (172 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.2+0.4−1.9±2.8
FH crosscourt27%−0.2−1.6+0.5−1.3±4.3
FH down the line27%−1.8+1.3+2.6+2.1±4.6

Lean FH down the line: +2.8±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (101 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9+1.5−0.3−1.7±2.3
BH crosscourt26%+1.0−1.3+0.6+0.4±3.2
BH down the line17%−0.2−2.7+1.3−1.6±4.9
BH slice crosscourt5%−4.0−1.1±0.0−5.1±1.3
BH slice through the middle5%−11.3+0.6±0.0−10.7±1.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.1±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (156 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Albert Ramos

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+4.0±3.7+3.5+0.5
FH to their backhand · rally+3.1±3.3+2.7+0.4
BH to the middle · return+3.1±2.7+1.1+2.0
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.8±3.8+1.9−0.1
FH to the middle · serve +1+1.5±2.6+0.3+1.2
BH to their forehand · rally+0.9±3.4+2.6−1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1−7.3±4.3−5.7−1.7
BH to their backhand · serve +1−4.2±3.4−3.4−0.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.6±4.0−1.2−1.3
FH to their forehand · return +1−1.6±4.2−2.6+1.0
BH slice to their backhand · rally−1.3±2.5−2.1+0.8

Gaston Gaudio

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally+4.8±3.3+2.5+2.3
FH to their backhand · return+4.4±4.7+2.1+2.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.1±3.5+0.1+3.0
BH to the middle · return+2.8±2.8+0.4+2.3
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.4±4.3+1.0+1.4
BH to their forehand · rally+1.9±3.5+0.6+1.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · serve +1−4.3±2.6−2.8−1.5
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.4±3.3−2.7+0.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally−2.4±2.5−0.2−2.2
FH to the middle · return +1−2.1±2.8+0.5−2.6
BH to their backhand · return−2.1±3.1−3.3+1.2

Against Gaston Gaudio-like opponents

Albert Ramos vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.7%35.3%
Players most similar to Gaston Gaudio3 62.0%41.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Flavio Cobolli, Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Pedro Martinez, Mattia Bellucci, Yoshihito Nishioka, Cristian Garin, Egor Gerasimov, Juan Carlos Ferrero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.