RallyIQ

Game plan

Alexandr Dolgopolov v Nicolas Jarry

Every number combines what Alexandr Dolgopolov does well with what Nicolas Jarry allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Alexandr Dolgopolov wins, best of 3 42%90%: 22%–64% · best of 5: 40%
Serve points won 65.3% / 67.1% Alexandr / Nicolas · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 43%serve 65.5% / 66.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Alexandr Dolgopolov's record against Nicolas Jarry's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −2.1 on serve, −3.0 on return vs expectation (200 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerAlexandrNicolas
Direction choice+0.18 ±0.06
better than 92%
−0.23 ±0.09
better than 9%
Shot selection−0.24 ±0.16
better than 28%
+0.02 ±0.14
better than 54%
Execution−0.90 ±0.66
better than 28%
−0.45 ±0.54
better than 46%
Points left on the table2.15 ±0.12
lower than 96%
3.09 ±0.16
lower than 16%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Alexandr Dolgopolov serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlexandr winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide65%73%76%75.7%±4.378% ▲
Body7%63%67%66.8%±10.90% ▼
T28%80%73%78.4%±5.722% ▼

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlexandr winsv NicolasMatchupOptimal
Wide58%70%76%73.7%±4.952% ▼
Body7%62%68%67.3%±11.10% ▼
T35%74%76%78.2%±5.348% ▲

Optimal v Nicolas Jarry: +0.9±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Nicolas Jarry serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv AlexandrMatchupOptimal
Wide43%74%75%75.8%±4.656% ▲
Body6%64%68%69.0%±9.30% ▼
T51%74%72%71.5%±5.444% ▼

Optimal v Alexandr Dolgopolov: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNicolas winsv AlexandrMatchupOptimal
Wide55%75%74%75.8%±4.949% ▼
Body8%67%60%64.3%±10.20% ▼
T38%75%76%78.4%±4.951% ▲

Optimal v Alexandr Dolgopolov: +0.9±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Alexandr Dolgopolov returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH slice through the middle36%−4.2+1.7+1.5−1.0±2.0
FH slice down the line20%−4.3+0.6+1.6−2.1±3.1
FH down the line18%+1.7−7.1−1.6−7.0±4.5
FH through the middle15%+4.3−3.0+2.6+3.9±2.7
FH slice crosscourt6%−4.3+1.7+0.6−2.1±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +5.4±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (401 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH through the middle47%+6.4−1.3+3.5+8.6±2.1
BH crosscourt30%+8.8+0.1+1.5+10.3±3.2
BH down the line10%+4.2−1.4+6.3+9.2±4.6
BH slice through the middle6%−4.2−1.6+1.2−4.7±2.2
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−1.7−0.4−1.6±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.9±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (344 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
FH down the line39%−1.8+2.3+3.7+4.2±4.7
FH through the middle24%−3.5−1.7+0.1−5.1±2.5
FH slice down the line17%−9.4−0.6−0.1−10.1±2.5
FH crosscourt10%−0.2−0.4−0.8−1.4±3.8
FH slice through the middle10%−12.7−0.4−0.2−13.3±2.1

Lean FH down the line: +6.9±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (94 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NicolasValue
BH crosscourt52%+1.0−0.9−0.2−0.1±2.9
BH through the middle31%−2.9−1.6+2.0−2.5±2.1
BH down the line13%−0.2−0.6+4.2+3.4±4.8
BH slice crosscourt5%−4.0±0.0−0.9−4.8±2.0

Lean BH down the line: +4.0±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (175 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Nicolas Jarry returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexandrValue
FH through the middle61%+4.3+3.0+0.6+7.8±2.2
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+3.0−0.2+8.3±4.2
FH down the line13%+1.7+0.2−1.1+0.8±4.4
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−0.3+0.9−3.6±2.3
BH through the middle1%+6.6+0.6−0.9+6.2±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.9±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (680 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexandrValue
BH through the middle51%+6.4+2.5−0.9+8.0±2.3
BH crosscourt28%+8.8+0.9+0.1+9.8±3.1
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.9+1.0−4.1±2.5
BH down the line7%+4.2+6.5−1.0+9.7±4.5
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5+0.3+1.5+2.3±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.7±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (773 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexandrValue
FH through the middle65%−3.5−0.7+2.0−2.2±2.7
FH crosscourt23%−0.2+2.1−0.8+1.1±4.3
FH down the line12%−1.8−3.0−0.4−5.2±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.9±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (149 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexandrValue
BH through the middle57%−2.9−2.0−3.4−8.3±2.0
BH crosscourt30%+1.0+0.7+1.1+2.8±2.8
BH down the line5%−0.2+0.1+1.3+1.2±4.9
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.1+2.0−0.8±2.3
FH inside-in2%+0.6+0.5−0.8+0.3±4.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.6±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (617 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Alexandr Dolgopolov

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+7.2±6.1−2.5+9.7
BH to their forehand · rally+6.7±5.3+7.7−1.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.6±3.8+1.8+1.9
FH slice to the middle · return+3.5±2.7+1.4+2.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.6±4.7+1.4+1.2
BH slice to their backhand · rally+1.8±3.2+3.0−1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−7.8±6.5−3.9−3.9
BH to the middle · rally−5.6±2.1−3.3−2.2
FH to the middle · return−4.3±3.2−5.1+0.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1−4.2±3.5−3.8−0.4
BH to their forehand · return +1−4.0±7.0−5.9+1.9

Nicolas Jarry

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+6.4±5.9+3.8+2.5
FH to the middle · return+3.5±2.6+2.3+1.2
FH to their forehand · return +1+0.7±5.1−0.9+1.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1+0.3±4.4+0.1+0.1
FH to their forehand · return+0.1±5.2+1.7−1.7
FH to their backhand · return−0.8±4.8−1.2+0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return +1−8.9±3.4−7.5−1.4
BH to their backhand · return +1−8.0±3.7−7.2−0.8
BH slice to their backhand · rally−7.6±3.4−6.9−0.6
BH to their forehand · rally−7.4±5.2−4.3−3.1
FH to the middle · rally−6.6±2.6−6.6±0.0

Against Nicolas Jarry-like opponents

Alexandr Dolgopolov vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.8%34.3%
Players most similar to Nicolas Jarry1 63.4%31.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jiri Lehecka, Arthur Rinderknech, Denis Shapovalov, Zizou Bergs, Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard, Reilly Opelka, Gabriel Diallo, Aslan Karatsev, Vasek Pospisil, Sam Querrey. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.