RallyIQ

Game plan

Benjamin Bonzi v Fabio Fognini

Every number combines what Benjamin Bonzi does well with what Fabio Fognini allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Benjamin Bonzi wins, best of 3 48%90%: 15%–83% · best of 5: 47%
Serve points won 64.4% / 64.8% Benjamin / Fabio · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 45%serve 64.1% / 65.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Benjamin Bonzi's record against Fabio Fognini's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +8.4 on serve, +4.1 on return vs expectation (136 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerBenjaminFabio
Direction choice+0.02 ±0.09
better than 61%
±0.00 ±0.06
better than 58%
Shot selection−0.12 ±0.18
better than 36%
−0.12 ±0.12
better than 36%
Execution−0.84 ±0.55
better than 30%
−1.06 ±0.38
better than 24%
Points left on the table2.35 ±0.11
lower than 77%
2.46 ±0.10
lower than 67%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Benjamin Bonzi serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBenjamin winsv FabioMatchupOptimal
Wide42%72%69%67.9%±6.737% ▼
Body8%67%73%75.9%±9.90% ▼
T50%75%75%74.8%±6.263% ▲

Optimal v Fabio Fognini: +0.1±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBenjamin winsv FabioMatchupOptimal
Wide45%71%71%69.3%±7.243% ▼
Body10%60%71%68.4%±11.60% ▼
T44%73%71%71.7%±7.257% ▲

Optimal v Fabio Fognini: +0.2±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Fabio Fognini serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFabio winsv BenjaminMatchupOptimal
Wide44%71%73%71.1%±6.243%
Body13%56%57%48.6%±12.30% ▼
T44%68%83%77.2%±7.057% ▲

Optimal v Benjamin Bonzi: +1.1±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +6.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFabio winsv BenjaminMatchupOptimal
Wide46%67%79%74.3%±6.946%
Body13%57%70%64.9%±12.00% ▼
T41%67%73%68.5%±7.254% ▲

Optimal v Benjamin Bonzi: +0.5±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Benjamin Bonzi returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabioValue
FH slice through the middle41%−4.2−0.4+0.9−3.7±2.3
FH through the middle21%+4.3+2.2+1.3+7.8±2.6
FH slice crosscourt16%−4.3+0.8−1.5−5.0±2.6
FH slice down the line9%−4.3+0.8+1.4−2.0±2.8
FH down the line6%+1.7+0.7−0.3+2.1±3.8

Lean FH through the middle: +8.2±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (225 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabioValue
BH through the middle52%+6.4+0.8+0.6+7.9±2.3
BH crosscourt22%+8.8−1.1+2.8+10.5±3.1
BH down the line10%+4.2−1.7±0.0+2.5±4.3
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2±0.0+2.1−2.2±2.2
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−2.2+3.8+2.2±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.4±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (159 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabioValue
FH through the middle38%−3.5−0.4+0.8−3.1±2.5
FH crosscourt35%−0.2+1.6+0.6+1.9±4.1
FH down the line17%−1.8+1.5+0.9+0.7±4.1
FH slice through the middle10%−12.7+0.1−0.8−13.4±1.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.7±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (81 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabioValue
BH through the middle51%−2.9−0.3+0.4−2.7±2.2
BH crosscourt38%+1.0−3.1+1.7−0.4±2.9
BH down the line11%−0.2−1.3−0.4−1.9±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.4±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (116 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Fabio Fognini returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenjaminValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3+1.0−0.4+4.9±2.5
FH down the line18%+1.7+4.7+3.7+10.2±4.3
FH slice through the middle16%−4.2+0.2−1.2−5.2±2.2
FH crosscourt14%+5.5−0.3−1.5+3.7±4.3
FH slice down the line5%−4.3+0.8±0.0−3.5±2.2

Lean FH down the line: +6.8±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (717 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenjaminValue
BH through the middle35%+6.4+0.4+0.7+7.6±2.4
BH crosscourt22%+8.8−0.2−0.3+8.3±3.3
BH slice through the middle19%−4.2+1.4−2.0−4.8±2.3
BH slice crosscourt13%+0.5−0.8−2.1−2.4±2.6
BH down the line6%+4.2−1.0−1.9+1.3±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.4±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (814 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenjaminValue
FH through the middle50%−3.5−0.5−1.2−5.1±2.9
FH down the line35%−1.8−4.1−2.0−7.9±4.3
FH crosscourt15%−0.2−0.2−2.6−3.0±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (145 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BenjaminValue
BH through the middle39%−2.9−0.6−0.5−3.9±2.1
BH crosscourt37%+1.0+0.2−1.8−0.5±2.9
BH down the line14%−0.2−1.0+0.8−0.4±4.8
FH through the middle3%−2.9+0.1−1.2−3.9±2.4
BH slice crosscourt2%−4.0−2.7±0.0−6.7±1.6

Lean BH down the line: +1.9±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (690 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Benjamin Bonzi

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · rally+3.1±2.6+1.4+1.7
BH to their forehand · rally+2.6±4.8+4.3−1.7
BH to the middle · return+2.3±2.8±0.0+2.3
FH to the middle · serve +1+1.4±3.0+1.4+0.1
BH to their backhand · return +1+0.8±4.3−0.3+1.1
BH to their backhand · rally+0.6±3.6−0.8+1.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1−6.7±4.5−1.1−5.6
FH to their forehand · rally−3.9±4.0−4.1+0.1
FH to the middle · rally−3.5±2.9+1.2−4.7
BH to their backhand · serve +1−1.6±3.8±0.0−1.6
BH slice to their backhand · rally−1.2±3.0−1.3+0.2

Fabio Fognini

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1+2.0±2.9−1.0+2.9
BH to their backhand · rally+1.5±3.1+0.9+0.6
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.0±4.2−0.4+1.4
BH to the middle · return+0.1±3.3−0.9+1.1
FH to their backhand · rally−0.1±4.6−2.3+2.2
FH to the middle · return−0.1±3.2+0.1−0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−8.1±3.9−7.4−0.7
BH to their forehand · return−5.5±5.5−4.6−0.9
BH to their backhand · serve +1−4.0±3.9−0.2−3.8
BH to their backhand · return−4.0±4.0−2.3−1.7
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.9±4.2−2.7−0.2

Against Fabio Fognini-like opponents

Benjamin Bonzi vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–65.4%35.2%
Players most similar to Fabio Fognini1 73.3%40.8%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Alexander Shevchenko, Zizou Bergs, Laslo Djere, Alexandre Muller, Roman Safiullin, Matteo Arnaldi, Otto Virtanen, Kei Nishikori, Lucas Pouille, Gregoire Barrere. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.