RallyIQ

Game plan

Casper Ruud v Borna Coric

Every number combines what Casper Ruud does well with what Borna Coric allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Casper Ruud wins, best of 3 64%90%: 41%–83% · best of 5: 68%
Serve points won 67.8% / 64.7% Casper / Borna · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 65%serve 67.6% / 64.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Casper Ruud's record against Borna Coric's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +0.5 on serve, −0.9 on return vs expectation (1869 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerCasperBorna
Direction choice−0.03 ±0.05
better than 49%
+0.17 ±0.06
better than 91%
Shot selection−0.02 ±0.09
better than 51%
−0.12 ±0.13
better than 37%
Execution+0.87 ±0.19
better than 93%
−0.53 ±0.35
better than 43%
Points left on the table2.68 ±0.08
lower than 40%
2.25 ±0.10
lower than 88%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Casper Ruud +1.09, Borna Coric −1.23. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Casper Ruud serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCasper winsv BornaMatchupOptimal
Wide48%75%78%80.1%±2.861% ▲
Body9%64%56%56.8%±8.80% ▼
T43%78%76%78.9%±3.239% ▼

Optimal v Borna Coric: +1.1±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCasper winsv BornaMatchupOptimal
Wide52%71%76%74.2%±3.546% ▼
Body7%60%59%56.3%±8.90% ▼
T41%72%74%73.6%±3.854% ▲

Optimal v Borna Coric: +0.9±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Borna Coric serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBorna winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide42%71%73%71.6%±3.555% ▲
Body5%58%63%57.0%±8.70% ▼
T52%73%74%71.9%±3.445% ▼

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.5±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBorna winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide49%73%71%70.6%±3.642% ▼
Body6%59%62%57.7%±8.60% ▼
T45%72%73%72.9%±3.758% ▲

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.8±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Casper Ruud returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3+0.7−0.6+4.4±1.7
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2−0.7+1.3−3.6±1.8
FH down the line13%+1.7+1.2−2.1+0.7±3.5
FH crosscourt11%+5.5−1.3−0.8+3.4±3.6
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+1.5+0.9−1.9±2.9

Lean FH through the middle: +3.5±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (2447 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+1.2+0.5+8.2±1.6
BH crosscourt31%+8.8+2.4−1.6+9.6±2.4
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.7+0.2−5.7±1.9
BH down the line8%+4.2+3.2−0.9+6.6±4.1
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.7+0.9+0.8±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.3±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (3085 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+1.8−0.1−1.8±2.1
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+1.1−0.7+0.2±3.9
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.8−1.0−2.0±4.5
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7+0.2+0.5−12.0±2.2
BH through the middle1%+0.1+0.3+0.6+1.0±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (709 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4+0.6+2.0±2.0
BH through the middle25%−2.9−1.2+0.6−3.4±1.5
FH through the middle17%−2.9−0.2−0.1−3.2±1.8
FH inside-in10%+0.6+2.1−0.7+1.9±3.8
FH inside-out9%+1.0−1.6−1.0−1.7±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.2±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (2232 returns charted)

Borna Coric returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−1.2+0.8+3.8±1.6
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−0.9+2.7+7.3±3.1
FH down the line13%+1.7+0.2−3.0−1.1±3.5
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2−2.6−1.0−7.8±2.1
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−3.0+0.3−7.0±3.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.1±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (791 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4−1.8+0.7+5.3±1.6
BH crosscourt39%+8.8−2.2−0.3+6.3±2.2
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.2−1.0−5.4±2.1
BH down the line6%+4.2−4.0−0.4−0.2±3.9
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.3−1.1−0.9±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.3±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (704 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle42%−3.5−2.6+0.4−5.7±2.2
FH crosscourt35%−0.2−4.3−4.0−8.5±3.8
FH down the line21%−1.8+0.8−1.8−2.8±4.2
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−1.2−0.7−14.6±1.9

Lean FH down the line: +3.4±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (266 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH crosscourt56%+1.0−0.4−1.0−0.4±1.9
BH through the middle34%−2.9−1.0±0.0−3.9±1.7
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.1+3.4+3.2±4.2
FH through the middle1%−2.9+0.7+0.4−1.8±1.5

Lean BH down the line: +4.5±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (534 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Casper Ruud

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally+8.5±5.7+5.5+3.0
FH volley to their backhand · rally+6.0±5.3+3.8+2.2
FH to their forehand · rally+3.6±1.4+2.3+1.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.5±2.1+2.6+0.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.4±2.0+1.5+1.9
FH slice to the middle · rally+3.4±2.4+0.9+2.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · serve +1−3.7±3.9−1.6−2.0
FH to their backhand · return−2.5±2.6−0.7−1.8
BH to their forehand · return−2.0±3.3+2.6−4.6
BH slice to the middle · return +1−1.3±2.1−0.7−0.6
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1−1.1±2.7−0.1−1.0

Borna Coric

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+1.6±5.0+0.7+0.9
BH to the middle · serve +1+0.9±1.9+1.3−0.5
FH to the middle · return+0.6±1.3−0.8+1.4
FH to their backhand · serve +1−0.1±1.7+0.1−0.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1−0.5±3.8−1.7+1.3
BH to their backhand · serve +1−0.5±1.7−0.5+0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to the middle · rally−4.8±1.9−2.0−2.9
FH slice to the middle · return−4.6±2.0−3.6−1.0
BH slice to their forehand · rally−4.5±3.2−0.6−3.9
BH slice to their backhand · return +1−4.3±2.4−2.5−1.8
FH to their backhand · return +1−4.3±2.7−2.3−2.0

Against Borna Coric-like opponents

Casper Ruud vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.3%36.7%
Players most similar to Borna Coric12 67.0%33.9%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Andrey Rublev, Sebastian Korda, Jack Draper, Karen Khachanov, Taylor Fritz, Laslo Djere, David Goffin, Juan Martin Del Potro, Nicolas Almagro, Nikolay Davydenko. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.