RallyIQ

Game plan

Christopher Oconnell v Bjorn Borg

Every number combines what Christopher Oconnell does well with what Bjorn Borg allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Christopher Oconnell wins, best of 3 20%90%: 6%–47% · best of 5: 15%
Serve points won 57.4% / 63.9% Christopher / Bjorn · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 18%serve 57.2% / 64.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Christopher Oconnell's record against Bjorn Borg's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.9 on serve, +4.2 on return vs expectation (237 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerChristopherBjorn
Direction choice+0.35 ±0.06
better than 99%
−0.13 ±0.11
better than 23%
Shot selection−0.54 ±0.24
better than 10%
−0.06 ±0.27
better than 45%
Execution−0.86 ±0.46
better than 30%
+1.07 ±0.51
better than 96%
Points left on the table2.34 ±0.14
lower than 80%
3.05 ±0.34
lower than 18%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Christopher Oconnell serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowChristopher winsv BjornMatchupOptimal
Wide39%67%66%59.5%±7.639%
Body4%63%62%61.5%±13.217% ▲
T57%73%60%57.8%±7.044% ▼

Optimal v Bjorn Borg: +0.7±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowChristopher winsv BjornMatchupOptimal
Wide49%74%63%64.6%±6.943% ▼
Body4%52%55%43.4%±14.60% ▼
T48%69%67%63.2%±7.957% ▲

Optimal v Bjorn Borg: ±0.0±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Bjorn Borg serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBjorn winsv ChristopherMatchupOptimal
Wide59%72%78%76.8%±5.854% ▼
Body8%65%62%63.0%±12.30% ▼
T33%73%80%78.5%±6.446% ▲

Optimal v Christopher Oconnell: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBjorn winsv ChristopherMatchupOptimal
Wide38%70%72%69.4%±7.234% ▼
Body9%58%59%53.6%±12.90% ▼
T53%67%74%69.2%±7.366% ▲

Optimal v Christopher Oconnell: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Christopher Oconnell returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BjornValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3+1.0+2.0+7.3±2.7
FH down the line28%+1.7−3.0+4.3+3.0±4.3
FH crosscourt25%+5.5−0.4−1.0+4.1±4.4
FH slice through the middle7%−4.2−2.4+2.7−3.9±2.2
FH slice crosscourt3%−4.3−1.2+0.4−5.2±1.8

Lean FH through the middle: +3.1±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (239 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BjornValue
BH slice through the middle42%−4.2−0.4+1.7−2.9±2.2
BH slice crosscourt35%+0.5+0.6+0.2+1.3±2.9
BH through the middle10%+6.4−0.4−1.2+4.8±2.7
BH crosscourt5%+8.8−1.9+0.8+7.8±3.3
BH slice down the line5%−8.4−1.7+6.3−3.8±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.7±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (317 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BjornValue
FH through the middle40%−3.5−0.1+0.9−2.6±2.7
FH crosscourt39%−0.2+1.3+2.3+3.4±4.3
FH down the line20%−1.8−0.2−0.1−2.2±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.5±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (84 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BjornValue
BH slice crosscourt49%−4.0−1.7+0.3−5.4±2.5
BH slice through the middle21%−11.3−2.2+2.5−10.9±2.4
BH through the middle7%−2.9−1.5+0.8−3.5±2.2
BH crosscourt5%+1.0−0.6+0.8+1.3±2.9
FH inside-out5%+1.0+0.8−0.1+1.6±3.2

Lean BH slice crosscourt: −0.2±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (189 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Bjorn Borg returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ChristopherValue
FH through the middle59%+4.3+1.1−0.6+4.7±2.6
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+2.2+3.1+10.8±4.3
FH down the line17%+1.7+0.4−1.7+0.3±4.5
BH through the middle2%+6.6+1.1+0.9+8.6±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.4±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (321 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ChristopherValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4−0.3+0.9+7.0±2.3
BH crosscourt30%+8.8+2.9−0.2+11.6±3.1
BH down the line14%+4.2+3.7−1.8+6.1±4.5
BH slice through the middle7%−4.2+0.7−1.2−4.8±2.5
BH slice crosscourt3%+0.5+1.2−1.5+0.2±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.6±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (687 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ChristopherValue
FH through the middle51%−3.5+1.9+2.3+0.7±2.9
FH crosscourt31%−0.2+2.2+3.4+5.3±4.4
FH down the line19%−1.8+3.0+0.3+1.5±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.1±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (108 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv ChristopherValue
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+2.2+0.1+3.3±2.9
BH through the middle27%−2.9−1.3+2.1−2.1±2.3
FH through the middle17%−2.9+2.0+2.3+1.4±2.4
FH inside-out11%+1.0+1.1+0.3+2.4±3.7
BH down the line8%−0.2+2.6±0.0+2.3±4.9
FH inside-in6%+0.6+3.0+3.4+6.9±4.3

Lean FH inside-in: +5.3±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (372 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Christopher Oconnell

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return +1+6.1±2.7+3.5+2.6
BH slice to the middle · rally+5.6±1.8+2.0+3.6
FH to their forehand · return +1+3.9±3.9+0.5+3.4
FH to the middle · rally+3.8±1.9+1.3+2.5
BH slice to their backhand · return +1+3.3±2.6+0.4+2.9
FH to the middle · serve +1+2.6±2.6+1.5+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−4.0±3.8−3.2−0.7
FH to their backhand · return +1−3.5±3.7−3.3−0.1
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.7±3.4−1.2−1.6
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.2±3.3+1.5−3.8
BH slice to their backhand · return−1.9±2.4−1.9±0.0

Bjorn Borg

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+5.7±4.1+1.2+4.5
BH to their forehand · rally+5.3±3.5+3.3+2.0
BH to their forehand · return+4.6±4.1+6.0−1.4
BH to the middle · return +1+3.1±2.5+1.1+1.9
FH to their backhand · rally+3.0±2.1+1.8+1.2
BH to their backhand · return +1+2.7±2.8+2.7±0.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1−2.9±2.9−0.1−2.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.9±2.9±0.0−2.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.4±3.4−0.3−1.1
BH to the middle · rally−0.3±1.8+0.4−0.7
FH to their forehand · return +1−0.2±4.0−1.8+1.6

Against Bjorn Borg-like opponents

Christopher Oconnell vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–60.0%33.9%
Players most similar to Bjorn Borg1 62.3%43.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Tomas Martin Etcheverry, Diego Schwartzman, Karue Sell, Andy Murray, John Millman, Gilles Simon, Guillermo Canas, Jiri Novak, Michael Chang, Aaron Krickstein. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.