RallyIQ

Game plan

Corentin Moutet v Gaston Gaudio

Every number combines what Corentin Moutet does well with what Gaston Gaudio allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Corentin Moutet wins, best of 3 59%90%: 29%–84% · best of 5: 61%
Serve points won 59.2% / 57.5% Corentin / Gaston · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 59%serve 59.2% / 57.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Corentin Moutet's record against Gaston Gaudio's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerCorentinGaston
Direction choice−0.08 ±0.13
better than 37%
−0.11 ±0.11
better than 28%
Shot selection−1.02 ±0.20
better than 2%
−0.44 ±0.15
better than 15%
Execution−0.24 ±0.41
better than 56%
−0.18 ±0.54
better than 58%
Points left on the table3.10 ±0.17
lower than 16%
2.79 ±0.21
lower than 32%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Corentin Moutet serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCorentin winsv GastonMatchupOptimal
Wide26%70%66%63.0%±9.239% ▲
Body20%56%64%56.9%±14.96% ▼
T55%67%76%68.8%±8.255%

Optimal v Gaston Gaudio: +0.4±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCorentin winsv GastonMatchupOptimal
Wide52%64%63%52.9%±8.439% ▼
Body24%66%65%67.5%±13.124%
T24%73%67%68.5%±9.737% ▲

Optimal v Gaston Gaudio: +0.6±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +8.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Gaston Gaudio serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGaston winsv CorentinMatchupOptimal
Wide33%69%75%71.1%±7.746% ▲
Body7%65%66%68.2%±12.17%
T60%63%71%58.2%±8.447% ▼

Optimal v Corentin Moutet: +0.9±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +7.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGaston winsv CorentinMatchupOptimal
Wide62%68%70%65.5%±7.859% ▼
Body10%55%62%54.4%±13.60% ▼
T28%69%74%71.6%±8.641% ▲

Optimal v Corentin Moutet: +0.6±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Corentin Moutet returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GastonValue
FH slice through the middle37%−4.2+2.1−0.3−2.5±2.0
FH slice crosscourt26%−4.3+4.6±0.0+0.3±2.0
FH through the middle15%+4.3+0.7+1.9+6.8±3.1
FH crosscourt10%+5.5+0.7−0.4+5.8±4.4
FH slice down the line7%−4.3−4.0±0.0−8.2±2.1

Lean FH through the middle: +6.5±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (335 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GastonValue
BH through the middle31%+6.4−0.4+0.8+6.8±2.5
BH slice through the middle28%−4.2+1.2+1.2−1.9±2.4
BH slice down the line15%−8.4+2.2+1.1−5.2±3.4
BH down the line11%+4.2+0.2−1.2+3.2±4.6
BH crosscourt10%+8.8−3.6±0.0+5.2±3.6

Lean BH through the middle: +5.1±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (508 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GastonValue
FH through the middle40%−3.5−1.2−0.8−5.4±2.9
FH crosscourt36%−0.2−2.1+1.5−0.8±4.4
FH down the line13%−1.8±0.0±0.0−1.8±4.5
FH slice through the middle11%−12.7−0.3±0.0−12.9±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.3±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (161 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GastonValue
BH through the middle37%−2.9+0.6−0.6−3.0±2.5
BH crosscourt17%+1.0−0.7−0.9−0.6±3.1
BH down the line17%−0.2−3.5−0.9−4.6±5.0
FH inside-in9%+0.6−0.8+1.5+1.3±4.3
FH through the middle7%−2.9+0.4−0.8−3.2±2.3

Lean FH inside-in: +4.2±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (268 returns charted)

Gaston Gaudio returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CorentinValue
FH through the middle63%+4.3+1.5−1.4+4.3±2.7
FH down the line25%+1.7+3.2−0.9+4.0±4.5
FH crosscourt13%+5.5+1.2−1.2+5.5±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.1±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (163 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CorentinValue
BH slice through the middle32%−4.2−1.4−0.5−6.1±2.5
BH through the middle28%+6.4−0.5+1.8+7.7±2.4
BH crosscourt19%+8.8−2.0+0.9+7.7±3.4
BH slice crosscourt11%+0.5+0.5+0.2+1.2±2.7
BH down the line6%+4.2−1.8+0.3+2.7±3.8

Lean BH through the middle: +6.2±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (172 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CorentinValue
FH through the middle47%−3.5+1.2−0.1−2.4±2.8
FH crosscourt27%−0.2−1.6+3.1+1.2±4.2
FH down the line27%−1.8+1.3+0.4−0.1±4.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.1±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (101 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CorentinValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9+1.5+0.9−0.5±2.3
BH crosscourt26%+1.0−1.3−0.7−0.9±3.2
BH down the line17%−0.2−2.7−1.3−4.2±4.9
BH slice crosscourt5%−4.0−1.1±0.0−5.1±1.3
BH slice through the middle5%−11.3+0.6−0.5−11.2±1.7

Lean BH through the middle: +1.5±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (156 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Corentin Moutet

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return+5.8±3.2+1.2+4.6
FH to their backhand · rally+3.3±3.6+2.1+1.1
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.0±3.6+1.0+2.0
FH to their backhand · return +1+2.9±5.4+2.4+0.5
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.4±6.1+1.1+1.3
FH to their backhand · return+1.8±5.7−1.1+2.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · serve +1−9.4±5.1−7.1−2.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1−4.0±5.1−3.0−0.9
BH to their backhand · return−3.8±4.5−5.1+1.3
FH to their forehand · return−3.2±6.8+0.2−3.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.3±4.5−1.3−1.0

Gaston Gaudio

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally+5.6±5.3+4.6+1.0
FH to their backhand · return+5.2±5.5+3.1+2.0
FH to the middle · return +1+4.8±4.0+2.5+2.3
BH to the middle · return+3.4±3.0+0.3+3.0
FH to their forehand · rally+2.8±3.6+2.0+0.8
BH slice to the middle · return+0.8±3.6+1.0−0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · rally−7.1±3.4−0.5−6.6
BH to the middle · serve +1−5.2±3.9−4.7−0.5
BH to their backhand · return +1−4.6±4.9−1.9−2.7
BH to their backhand · rally−4.3±3.3−2.3−2.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.6±5.0−1.7−1.9

Against Gaston Gaudio-like opponents

Corentin Moutet vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–59.4%34.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Flavio Cobolli, Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Pedro Martinez, Mattia Bellucci, Yoshihito Nishioka, Albert Ramos, Cristian Garin, Egor Gerasimov, Juan Carlos Ferrero. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.