RallyIQ

Game plan

Daniel Elahi Galan v Alex Molcan

Every number combines what Daniel Elahi Galan does well with what Alex Molcan allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Daniel Elahi Galan wins, best of 3 41%90%: 14%–74% · best of 5: 39%
Serve points won 64.6% / 66.5% Daniel / Alex · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 38%serve 64.4% / 66.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Daniel Elahi Galan's record against Alex Molcan's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +4.7 on serve, +5.8 on return vs expectation (164 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerDanielAlex
Direction choice−0.09 ±0.10
better than 32%
−0.14 ±0.11
better than 20%
Shot selection+0.44 ±0.13
better than 89%
−0.41 ±0.18
better than 17%
Execution−0.67 ±0.46
better than 38%
+0.53 ±0.66
better than 85%
Points left on the table2.56 ±0.23
lower than 54%
2.65 ±0.27
lower than 45%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Daniel Elahi Galan −0.20, Alex Molcan +1.40. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Daniel Elahi Galan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDaniel winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide39%68%71%65.7%±7.637% ▼
Body11%56%51%43.4%±14.20% ▼
T50%71%81%77.7%±6.863% ▲

Optimal v Alex Molcan: +1.0±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +8.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDaniel winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide54%70%77%74.4%±7.652% ▼
Body11%58%63%57.3%±14.40% ▼
T35%64%73%65.3%±8.448% ▲

Optimal v Alex Molcan: +0.3±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +5.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Alex Molcan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlex winsv DanielMatchupOptimal
Wide28%72%75%74.3%±8.341% ▲
Body19%61%69%66.7%±11.36% ▼
T52%66%75%65.2%±7.853%

Optimal v Daniel Elahi Galan: +0.8±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +6.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlex winsv DanielMatchupOptimal
Wide42%68%70%64.6%±8.342%
Body13%59%61%56.8%±13.70% ▼
T45%71%72%70.7%±8.658% ▲

Optimal v Daniel Elahi Galan: +0.9±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Daniel Elahi Galan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3+0.1−1.1+3.2±2.9
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−2.1+1.3+4.7±4.4
FH down the line17%+1.7−0.9−1.1−0.3±4.1
FH slice through the middle3%−4.2−1.4−1.4−7.0±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (219 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH through the middle37%+6.4−0.8+0.1+5.7±2.6
BH crosscourt34%+8.8+1.0+2.7+12.5±3.5
BH down the line14%+4.2−0.9−1.4+1.8±4.6
BH slice through the middle6%−4.2−0.8+1.7−3.4±2.3
BH slice crosscourt6%+0.5±0.0+0.6+1.1±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.2±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (286 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5−0.5+1.3−2.7±2.8
FH crosscourt34%−0.2−2.6+0.8−2.0±4.0
FH down the line14%−1.8−0.9+2.1−0.6±3.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.1±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (50 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH crosscourt47%+1.0−1.0−0.8−0.8±3.2
BH through the middle45%−2.9−0.6+1.3−2.2±2.5
BH down the line8%−0.2−0.6−4.2−5.0±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.0±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (200 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Alex Molcan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DanielValue
FH through the middle34%+4.3±0.0−2.9+1.3±2.9
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2−0.8−2.5−7.5±2.3
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+0.7+2.0+8.1±4.3
FH down the line10%+1.7−1.2−0.9−0.4±4.3
FH slice crosscourt6%−4.3+0.8−0.2−3.7±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +8.6±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (177 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DanielValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.1−0.2+7.3±2.5
BH crosscourt14%+8.8−2.6+0.2+6.4±3.6
BH slice through the middle14%−4.2−0.4−2.1−6.7±2.4
BH down the line11%+4.2+2.8+0.4+7.4±4.4
BH slice down the line10%−8.4−0.7−3.2−12.3±3.4

Lean BH down the line: +4.4±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (290 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DanielValue
FH crosscourt50%−0.2−0.8−0.6−1.7±4.4
FH through the middle38%−3.5±0.0−0.9−4.4±2.9
FH down the line12%−1.8+1.1+0.8+0.2±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.8±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (86 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DanielValue
BH through the middle66%−2.9+2.5+0.6+0.3±2.4
BH crosscourt23%+1.0+1.8+5.3+8.2±3.3
BH down the line11%−0.2+2.1−0.7+1.2±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.9±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (137 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Daniel Elahi Galan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return +1+5.2±3.5+2.8+2.4
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.8±3.4+2.0+1.8
BH to the middle · rally+2.7±2.5+1.1+1.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.7±4.6+1.9−0.2
BH to their forehand · rally+1.7±4.7−0.4+2.1
BH to the middle · return+1.6±3.0+0.2+1.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return−4.0±4.2−1.2−2.8
BH to their backhand · rally−4.0±3.1−2.7−1.3
FH to their backhand · return−2.3±4.1−4.1+1.8
BH to the middle · return +1−2.1±3.1−2.7+0.6
BH to their forehand · return−1.1±5.8−2.4+1.3

Alex Molcan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+7.1±6.2+2.5+4.6
BH to their forehand · return+5.2±5.7+1.4+3.7
BH to the middle · return +1+4.0±3.1+2.8+1.2
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.5±4.8−1.8+5.3
FH to their backhand · return+3.0±5.1+1.3+1.7
BH to the middle · serve +1+2.9±3.2+1.6+1.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · rally−2.6±2.5−1.8−0.9
FH to the middle · return−1.4±3.4+0.5−1.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1−1.2±4.3−1.9+0.7
BH to their backhand · return−0.3±4.3+2.7−2.9
BH to their backhand · rally−0.2±3.1−1.3+1.1

Against Alex Molcan-like opponents

Daniel Elahi Galan vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.6%34.6%
Players most similar to Alex Molcan1 66.7%45.5%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Gael Monfils, Miomir Kecmanovic, Yoshihito Nishioka, Albert Ramos, Emil Ruusuvuori, Jiri Vesely, Juan Martin Del Potro, Guido Pella, Nikolay Davydenko. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.