RallyIQ

Game plan

Goran Ivanisevic v Mardy Fish

Every number combines what Goran Ivanisevic does well with what Mardy Fish allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Goran Ivanisevic wins, best of 3 66%90%: 35%–88% · best of 5: 69%
Serve points won 64.7% / 61.4% Goran / Mardy · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 65%serve 63.7% / 60.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Goran Ivanisevic's record against Mardy Fish's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +4.0 on serve, −3.2 on return vs expectation (876 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerGoranMardy
Direction choice−0.30 ±0.08
better than 5%
−0.14 ±0.17
better than 22%
Shot selection+0.24 ±0.16
better than 75%
+0.63 ±0.27
better than 96%
Execution−0.76 ±0.38
better than 34%
−1.57 ±0.69
better than 8%
Points left on the table4.76 ±0.30
lower than 1%
3.03 ±0.39
lower than 19%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Goran Ivanisevic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGoran winsv MardyMatchupOptimal
Wide43%82%73%82.4%±4.334% ▼
Body5%63%66%65.3%±11.70% ▼
T53%81%81%86.0%±4.466% ▲

Optimal v Mardy Fish: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGoran winsv MardyMatchupOptimal
Wide54%81%73%81.0%±4.944% ▼
Body3%66%65%67.8%±12.00% ▼
T43%88%73%88.5%±3.556% ▲

Optimal v Mardy Fish: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Mardy Fish serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMardy winsv GoranMatchupOptimal
Wide45%78%79%83.0%±4.438% ▼
Body7%59%68%63.1%±11.50% ▼
T49%80%84%88.0%±3.862% ▲

Optimal v Goran Ivanisevic: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMardy winsv GoranMatchupOptimal
Wide53%74%78%79.1%±5.146% ▼
Body6%51%63%50.3%±12.50% ▼
T41%73%78%78.9%±5.454% ▲

Optimal v Goran Ivanisevic: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Goran Ivanisevic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MardyValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3−3.9−1.7−1.3±2.4
FH down the line25%+1.7−3.1+0.8−0.6±4.1
FH crosscourt22%+5.5+0.8+2.4+8.7±4.0
BH slice through the middle1%−1.6−0.2−4.1−5.9±2.0
BH inside-in1%+7.7±0.0+2.1+9.9±3.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +7.6±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (827 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MardyValue
BH slice through the middle27%−4.2−1.7−4.1−10.0±2.1
BH through the middle23%+6.4−6.1−2.5−2.2±2.4
BH down the line16%+4.2−6.9+2.1−0.5±4.1
BH slice crosscourt12%+0.5−2.2+0.7−1.0±2.4
BH slice down the line11%−8.4+2.6−0.2−6.0±3.2
BH crosscourt10%+8.8−4.6+2.1+6.3±3.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +9.7±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1565 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MardyValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5−1.3−0.4−5.1±2.7
FH crosscourt35%−0.2+2.9−1.2+1.4±4.1
FH down the line16%−1.8+3.8−1.2+0.8±4.4
BH inside-in1%+2.5−0.6−0.5+1.4±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.2±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (355 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MardyValue
BH through the middle48%−2.9−1.7−0.1−4.7±1.8
BH down the line21%−0.2+1.4±0.0+1.2±4.4
BH crosscourt20%+1.0−3.6−0.5−3.1±3.0
FH through the middle3%−2.9−0.4−0.4−3.7±2.4
BH slice through the middle3%−11.3−0.5−1.0−12.8±2.4
FH inside-out2%+1.0+4.6−1.2+4.3±3.4

Lean FH inside-out: +7.5±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1106 returns charted)

Mardy Fish returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GoranValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3−0.3−1.9+2.1±2.5
FH crosscourt22%+5.5−0.5+1.8+6.8±4.0
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2−1.7−3.2−9.1±2.3
FH down the line12%+1.7−0.9−4.4−3.6±4.4
FH slice down the line6%−4.3+0.1−0.4−4.6±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.3±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (267 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GoranValue
BH through the middle32%+6.4−1.7−2.0+2.7±2.5
BH crosscourt25%+8.8−0.8−1.2+6.7±3.4
BH down the line16%+4.2+0.2−4.7−0.3±4.2
BH slice through the middle13%−4.2−0.2−2.0−6.4±2.0
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5−0.9+6.7+6.3±2.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.4±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (177 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GoranValue
FH through the middle55%−3.5+1.5−2.8−4.8±2.5
FH crosscourt26%−0.2−0.3+0.6+0.1±3.6
FH down the line13%−1.8−1.2−6.2−9.2±4.0
FH slice through the middle6%−12.7+1.1+1.0−10.6±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.6±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (82 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GoranValue
BH crosscourt45%+1.0+0.1−0.5+0.6±2.9
BH through the middle35%−2.9−2.7−1.1−6.7±2.1
BH down the line20%−0.2−1.3+1.6+0.1±4.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.7±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (152 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Goran Ivanisevic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally+3.5±5.0+2.1+1.3
FH to their backhand · return +1+2.6±4.2−1.2+3.8
BH slice to the middle · rally+2.6±2.7+0.7+1.9
FH to their backhand · return+2.5±4.1+1.0+1.5
BH to the middle · serve +1+0.5±3.2+0.8−0.4
FH to their backhand · rally+0.1±2.8+0.5−0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1−6.2±4.6−8.9+2.7
BH slice to the middle · return−5.8±2.5−0.9−4.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1−5.7±4.6−3.5−2.2
BH to their backhand · return−5.7±3.4−6.2+0.5
BH to the middle · return−5.1±2.3−2.4−2.7

Mardy Fish

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · serve +1+3.4±3.1+2.3+1.1
FH to the middle · rally+0.4±2.6−1.4+1.8
FH to their backhand · rally−0.3±3.1+0.1−0.3
BH to their forehand · return−1.2±4.9−0.3−0.9
BH to their backhand · return−1.2±3.3−0.8−0.5
BH to the middle · rally−1.3±2.2−2.1+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−7.8±4.9+0.5−8.3
BH to the middle · return−6.1±2.5−3.6−2.6
FH to their forehand · rally−5.9±3.8−2.5−3.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1−5.2±4.7−4.9−0.3
FH to their forehand · return +1−4.8±4.8−4.7−0.1

Against Mardy Fish-like opponents

Goran Ivanisevic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.5%31.4%
Players most similar to Mardy Fish5 71.2%32.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jan Lennard Struff, Otto Virtanen, Pierre Hugues Herbert, Ivan Ljubicic, Marat Safin, Nicolas Kiefer, Mario Ancic, Andrei Pavel, Yevgeny Kafelnikov, Cedric Pioline. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.