RallyIQ

Game plan

Greg Rusedski v Casper Ruud

Every number combines what Greg Rusedski does well with what Casper Ruud allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Greg Rusedski wins, best of 3 24%90%: 9%–47% · best of 5: 19%
Serve points won 64.1% / 69.9% Greg / Casper · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 24%serve 64.1% / 69.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Greg Rusedski's record against Casper Ruud's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerGregCasper
Direction choice−0.26 ±0.08
better than 8%
−0.03 ±0.05
better than 49%
Shot selection+0.04 ±0.27
better than 57%
−0.02 ±0.09
better than 51%
Execution−1.20 ±0.80
better than 19%
+0.87 ±0.19
better than 93%
Points left on the table5.41 ±0.29
lower than 1%
2.68 ±0.08
lower than 40%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Greg Rusedski serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowGreg winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide52%74%73%73.8%±4.366% ▲
Body8%69%63%68.6%±8.70% ▼
T39%72%74%70.5%±4.734% ▼

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowGreg winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide51%79%71%76.9%±4.047% ▼
Body9%69%62%68.0%±8.80% ▼
T40%82%73%82.4%±4.253% ▲

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +4.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Casper Ruud serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCasper winsv GregMatchupOptimal
Wide48%75%78%80.0%±3.561% ▲
Body9%64%72%72.5%±8.70% ▼
T43%78%79%81.2%±4.039% ▼

Optimal v Greg Rusedski: +1.0±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCasper winsv GregMatchupOptimal
Wide52%71%83%81.4%±4.346% ▼
Body7%60%61%58.3%±9.70% ▼
T41%72%78%77.8%±4.154% ▲

Optimal v Greg Rusedski: +0.9±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Greg Rusedski returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3−1.3+0.8+3.7±2.0
FH down the line19%+1.7−8.6+2.7−4.2±3.6
FH crosscourt18%+5.5−1.0−3.0+1.6±3.5
FH slice crosscourt6%−4.3−0.1+0.3−4.2±2.6
FH slice through the middle4%−4.2+1.6−1.0−3.5±1.9

Lean FH through the middle: +2.6±1.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (345 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH slice through the middle42%−4.2−0.7−1.0−5.9±1.8
BH slice down the line18%−8.4+0.8−1.1−8.7±3.1
BH slice crosscourt17%+0.5−0.1+0.1+0.6±3.0
BH through the middle10%+6.4−2.9+0.7+4.2±2.2
BH down the line8%+4.2−5.1−0.3−1.1±3.6
BH crosscourt4%+8.8−1.9−0.4+6.4±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +9.8±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (545 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle38%−3.5−2.8+0.4−5.9±2.4
FH down the line26%−1.8−4.4−4.0−10.1±4.1
FH crosscourt22%−0.2−1.1−1.8−3.1±3.8
FH slice crosscourt5%−12.5+0.1−0.5−12.9±2.3
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7+0.5−0.7−12.9±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.1±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (133 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH slice through the middle36%−11.3+1.0−3.7−14.0±2.3
BH slice down the line28%−9.3+1.2−0.7−8.8±4.2
BH slice crosscourt15%−4.0+0.4−1.5−5.1±2.1
BH through the middle8%−2.9−0.2±0.0−3.2±1.9
BH down the line6%−0.2+2.8−1.0+1.6±3.5

Lean BH down the line: +10.1±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (348 returns charted)

Casper Ruud returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GregValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3+0.7−0.7+4.3±2.1
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2−0.7±0.0−4.9±1.6
FH down the line13%+1.7+1.2−2.8±0.0±3.8
FH crosscourt11%+5.5−1.3+0.4+4.6±3.6
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+1.5−1.1−3.9±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.2±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (2447 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GregValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+1.2±0.0+7.6±2.0
BH crosscourt31%+8.8+2.4−1.9+9.3±2.7
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.7−0.2−6.1±2.1
BH down the line8%+4.2+3.2−4.7+2.7±4.1
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.7+2.0+1.8±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.6±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (3085 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GregValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+1.8−1.5−3.2±2.3
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+1.1+2.1+3.0±3.8
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.8−0.8−1.8±4.5
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7+0.2±0.0−12.5±1.7
BH through the middle1%+0.1+0.3−1.0−0.6±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.5±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (709 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv GregValue
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4−0.9+0.5±2.5
BH through the middle25%−2.9−1.2−1.0−5.0±1.9
FH through the middle17%−2.9−0.2−1.5−4.5±1.9
FH inside-in10%+0.6+2.1+2.1+4.7±3.7
FH inside-out9%+1.0−1.6−0.8−1.5±3.3

Lean FH inside-in: +6.4±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (2232 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Greg Rusedski

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1+4.6±5.2+3.1+1.5
BH slice to their forehand · return+3.7±3.3+4.1−0.4
BH volley to their forehand · rally+2.4±5.3+2.8−0.5
FH volley to their forehand · rally+1.7±5.0+0.8+0.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.2±2.8+1.4−0.2
BH slice to the middle · return +1+1.1±2.1+3.0−1.9

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−7.1±3.4−8.0+0.8
FH to their backhand · return−6.5±3.0−4.1−2.3
FH volley to their backhand · serve +1−6.4±4.7−2.3−4.1
BH volley to their backhand · serve +1−5.5±4.5−0.3−5.2
BH slice to their backhand · return−5.1±2.2−4.5−0.6

Casper Ruud

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+6.8±3.9+2.5+4.3
FH to their backhand · return +1+6.0±3.2+2.9+3.2
BH to their forehand · rally+3.9±3.0+3.0+0.9
BH to their backhand · return +1+3.7±2.6+2.1+1.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.4±2.6+1.5+1.9
BH to the middle · rally+2.5±1.7+1.7+0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their backhand · return−2.3±2.7±0.0−2.2
FH to their forehand · return−2.2±3.2+0.5−2.7
FH to the middle · return−2.2±1.6−0.1−2.1
BH slice to the middle · return−2.1±2.0−1.9−0.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.7±3.0+2.6−4.3

Against Casper Ruud-like opponents

Greg Rusedski vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.2%29.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Tommy Paul, Felix Auger Aliassime, Marcos Giron, Roberto Bautista Agut, Pablo Carreno Busta, Dusan Lajovic, Dominic Thiem, Radu Albot, Tommy Robredo. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.