RallyIQ

Game plan

Ivan Lendl v Yannick Noah

Every number combines what Ivan Lendl does well with what Yannick Noah allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Ivan Lendl wins, best of 3 90%90%: 73%–98% · best of 5: 95%
Serve points won 69.9% / 59.4% Ivan / Yannick · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 90%serve 69.1% / 58.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Ivan Lendl's record against Yannick Noah's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.2 on serve, −1.5 on return vs expectation (3541 points); head-to-head: −3.0 on serve, +1.9 on return vs expectation (437 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerIvanYannick
Direction choice+0.07 ±0.06
better than 75%
−0.48 ±0.25
better than 1%
Shot selection−0.70 ±0.11
better than 5%
−0.33 ±0.33
better than 20%
Execution+0.73 ±0.21
better than 89%
+0.58 ±0.52
better than 85%
Points left on the table2.96 ±0.11
lower than 22%
4.10 ±0.31
lower than 4%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Ivan Lendl serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowIvan winsv YannickMatchupOptimal
Wide49%72%63%62.6%±6.642% ▼
Body7%65%54%55.4%±8.60% ▼
T45%77%70%72.8%±6.458% ▲

Optimal v Yannick Noah: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowIvan winsv YannickMatchupOptimal
Wide55%73%62%62.6%±5.442% ▼
Body6%63%65%65.8%±9.86%
T39%73%75%76.2%±8.552% ▲

Optimal v Yannick Noah: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +8.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Yannick Noah serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowYannick winsv IvanMatchupOptimal
Wide39%64%68%58.5%±7.626% ▼
Body18%58%62%56.3%±9.418%
T43%76%68%69.4%±7.656% ▲

Optimal v Ivan Lendl: +0.1±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowYannick winsv IvanMatchupOptimal
Wide46%71%69%67.1%±6.959% ▲
Body9%69%61%67.5%±11.70% ▼
T46%70%70%68.6%±7.241% ▼

Optimal v Ivan Lendl: +0.2±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Ivan Lendl returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3−1.4−1.1+1.8±2.4
FH crosscourt30%+5.5+2.3−0.7+7.2±3.4
FH down the line22%+1.7−1.4+1.4+1.7±3.8
BH slice through the middle1%−1.6+1.4±0.0−0.2±2.1
FH slice through the middle1%−4.2+1.0±0.0−3.2±1.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.8±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1908 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
BH slice through the middle30%−4.2−0.1±0.0−4.2±1.8
BH slice crosscourt21%+0.5+3.5+3.6+7.6±2.4
BH through the middle16%+6.4−3.4−6.2−3.2±2.3
BH slice down the line13%−8.4+4.5+0.9−2.9±2.5
BH crosscourt11%+8.8+3.7+2.0+14.5±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +13.6±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (3467 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
FH crosscourt40%−0.2+0.6+1.1+1.4±3.9
FH through the middle36%−3.5+1.9+0.8−0.8±2.5
FH down the line23%−1.8+5.8+0.3+4.3±4.4
BH through the middle1%+0.1+0.4−0.2+0.3±1.8
BH slice through the middle1%−6.9+0.3±0.0−6.6±1.5

Lean FH down the line: +3.1±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (649 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv YannickValue
BH through the middle21%−2.9−0.6−0.2−3.7±2.1
BH slice crosscourt19%−4.0+3.5−0.4−0.9±2.2
BH crosscourt18%+1.0+0.6+2.2+3.8±2.8
BH slice through the middle12%−11.3+3.4±0.0−7.9±1.8
BH down the line7%−0.2−1.9−1.1−3.2±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.6±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (2117 returns charted)

Yannick Noah returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvanValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−0.1−1.2+2.9±2.3
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2+1.3+2.6−0.3±2.1
FH crosscourt15%+5.5−1.2±0.0+4.3±3.7
FH down the line10%+1.7+1.2+1.4+4.2±3.2
FH slice down the line6%−4.3+1.9+1.5−0.9±2.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.0±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (156 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvanValue
BH slice through the middle31%−4.2+4.0+2.4+2.2±1.9
BH through the middle21%+6.4−1.3−2.2+2.9±2.3
BH slice crosscourt20%+0.5+2.9+3.6+7.0±2.4
BH slice down the line14%−8.4+2.0+1.5−4.9±3.2
BH down the line9%+4.2+1.0−1.8+3.5±4.1
BH crosscourt5%+8.8+0.2+0.5+9.5±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.7±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (312 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvanValue
BH through the middle27%−2.9+0.7+1.2−1.0±1.9
BH slice crosscourt18%−4.0+2.1+2.5+0.6±1.9
BH slice down the line18%−9.3+3.3+6.3+0.3±3.9
BH slice through the middle18%−11.3+1.4+3.8−6.2±1.9
BH down the line8%−0.2−0.7+3.8+2.9±3.3

Lean BH slice crosscourt: +1.4±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (97 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Ivan Lendl

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+10.9±4.5+3.1+7.8
BH to their backhand · return+7.1±3.7+1.1+6.0
FH to their backhand · rally+6.6±3.5+1.7+4.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1+6.3±4.0+2.0+4.3
FH to their forehand · return +1+5.5±4.7+1.2+4.4
BH slice to their backhand · return+4.7±3.1+3.4+1.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return−9.2±2.8−3.9−5.4
FH to the middle · return−3.6±2.9−0.9−2.7
BH to the middle · rally−1.9±1.7−1.0−0.9
FH to the middle · rally+0.4±2.4±0.0+0.4
FH to their forehand · rally+0.5±3.6+0.7−0.1

Yannick Noah

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · return+12.3±4.3+8.1+4.2
BH slice to their backhand · return+9.4±3.0+6.4+3.1
BH slice to the middle · return+7.2±2.4+4.3+2.9
BH slice to their backhand · rally+6.9±2.4+4.4+2.4
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1+6.4±2.9+1.3+5.2
BH slice to the middle · rally+4.4±2.3+2.7+1.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−3.5±3.2−2.0−1.5
FH to their forehand · rally−1.4±2.6+1.1−2.6
BH to the middle · return−1.4±2.0±0.0−1.4
BH to the middle · return +1−1.3±2.2+1.8−3.1
FH to the middle · return−1.3±2.9−0.1−1.2

Against Yannick Noah-like opponents

Ivan Lendl vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–65.1%38.4%
Players most similar to Yannick Noah21 67.5%35.1%
Yannick Noah (charted head-to-head)2 62.1%40.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Feliciano Lopez, Sergiy Stakhovsky, Mischa Zverev, Paolo Lorenzi, Andrei Pavel, Patrick Rafter, Cedric Pioline, Guy Forget, John Mcenroe. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head