RallyIQ

Game plan

Ivo Karlovic v Jack Draper

Every number combines what Ivo Karlovic does well with what Jack Draper allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Ivo Karlovic wins, best of 3 24%90%: 11%–44% · best of 5: 19%
Serve points won 67.5% / 73.6% Ivo / Jack · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 23%serve 67.1% / 73.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Ivo Karlovic's record against Jack Draper's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +3.1 on serve, −1.4 on return vs expectation (475 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerIvoJack
Direction choice−0.09 ±0.11
better than 32%
+0.10 ±0.07
better than 81%
Shot selection+0.49 ±0.20
better than 92%
+0.26 ±0.13
better than 77%
Execution−2.18 ±0.54
better than 1%
+1.21 ±0.65
better than 98%
Points left on the table4.41 ±0.22
lower than 2%
2.75 ±0.11
lower than 35%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Ivo Karlovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowIvo winsv JackMatchupOptimal
Wide44%84%72%83.2%±3.557% ▲
Body8%66%62%65.0%±10.80% ▼
T48%82%71%79.1%±4.343% ▼

Optimal v Jack Draper: +0.8±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowIvo winsv JackMatchupOptimal
Wide62%82%75%83.1%±3.675% ▲
Body7%66%66%69.3%±10.90% ▼
T31%78%71%77.1%±4.925% ▼

Optimal v Jack Draper: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jack Draper serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJack winsv IvoMatchupOptimal
Wide41%71%81%79.5%±4.733% ▼
Body5%60%79%76.1%±8.60% ▼
T54%73%84%82.4%±3.667% ▲

Optimal v Ivo Karlovic: +0.4±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJack winsv IvoMatchupOptimal
Wide51%76%78%81.1%±3.964% ▲
Body6%65%72%73.6%±9.10% ▼
T43%73%81%82.0%±4.436% ▼

Optimal v Ivo Karlovic: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Ivo Karlovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
FH through the middle47%+4.3−2.9+2.1+3.5±2.4
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+0.5+2.4+8.4±4.1
FH down the line16%+1.7−1.2+0.9+1.4±4.4
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2+0.2±0.0−4.0±2.3
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3+0.3−1.8−5.8±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.7±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (634 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
BH slice through the middle58%−4.2+1.0−0.8−4.0±2.0
BH slice crosscourt23%+0.5−1.3+1.8+1.0±2.6
BH slice down the line15%−8.4±0.0−2.2−10.6±3.3
BH through the middle3%+6.4−3.3+1.9+5.0±2.4
BH crosscourt2%+8.8−5.6+1.2+4.4±3.2

Lean BH through the middle: +8.4±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (924 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−5.1−1.0−9.6±2.7
FH crosscourt34%−0.2−3.4+1.5−2.2±4.3
FH down the line17%−1.8−2.3+1.0−3.0±4.6
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−0.1+0.7−12.0±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (163 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JackValue
BH slice through the middle38%−11.3−1.1±0.0−12.4±1.4
BH slice crosscourt20%−4.0−1.5±0.0−5.6±1.7
FH inside-in14%+0.6−4.2+1.5−2.1±4.2
FH through the middle12%−2.9−0.6−1.0−4.5±2.3
BH slice down the line10%−9.3−1.0±0.0−10.3±3.1
FH inside-out6%+1.0−2.1+1.0−0.1±3.7

Lean FH inside-out: +7.6±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (506 returns charted)

Jack Draper returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.3−2.9+1.7±2.3
FH crosscourt27%+5.5+0.1−0.1+5.5±4.0
FH down the line14%+1.7−1.2−1.9−1.4±4.5
FH slice through the middle6%−4.2+0.9−2.3−5.6±2.3
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3+1.5+1.2−1.7±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.8±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (427 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.0−0.5+6.9±2.1
BH crosscourt28%+8.8−1.6−0.1+7.1±3.3
BH down the line12%+4.2+2.7−0.3+6.6±4.2
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−1.0−3.2−8.4±2.3
BH slice down the line3%−8.4+0.6−2.8−10.6±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (581 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−0.7−2.0−6.2±2.6
FH crosscourt31%−0.2−0.3−2.2−2.7±4.4
FH down the line18%−1.8+3.0−0.6+0.6±4.6
FH slice through the middle4%−12.7−2.1−2.3−17.0±2.1

Lean FH down the line: +4.9±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (179 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv IvoValue
BH through the middle45%−2.9+2.0−2.2−3.1±2.0
BH crosscourt27%+1.0−1.7−2.6−3.3±3.2
FH through the middle9%−2.9+1.5−2.0−3.3±2.2
BH down the line8%−0.2+0.3+2.7+2.8±4.6
FH inside-in6%+0.6−0.3−2.2−2.0±4.2

Lean BH down the line: +5.2±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (412 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Ivo Karlovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+4.2±3.4+5.0−0.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.3±3.2+0.3+1.0
BH slice to their forehand · rally+1.3±3.3−1.0+2.3
FH slice to the middle · return+0.5±2.3+0.2+0.3
FH to their backhand · rally−0.1±2.5−2.0+1.9
FH to their backhand · return−1.3±3.3−3.3+2.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return +1−7.9±2.6−5.8−2.2
FH to the middle · return−3.4±1.9−3.6+0.2
FH to their forehand · rally−3.4±2.8−4.8+1.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.2±2.4−2.0−1.2
FH to the middle · rally−2.9±2.3−3.8+0.9

Jack Draper

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+11.2±3.4+4.2+7.0
BH to their backhand · return +1+4.4±3.3+0.9+3.5
BH to their forehand · return +1+3.9±4.3+2.3+1.6
BH to their backhand · return+3.8±2.8+2.2+1.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.7±3.1+4.0−0.3
BH to their forehand · rally+3.1±3.4+3.0+0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · return +1−5.3±2.7+1.2−6.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally−4.6±2.5−0.2−4.4
FH to the middle · return−2.9±1.8+0.1−3.0
FH to the middle · serve +1−2.7±2.3±0.0−2.7
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.3±2.6−1.3−1.0

Against Jack Draper-like opponents

Ivo Karlovic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–70.9%25.6%
Players most similar to Jack Draper2 71.2%27.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Hubert Hurkacz, Gael Monfils, Novak Djokovic, Taylor Fritz, Arthur Cazaux, Borna Coric, David Goffin, Marcos Baghdatis, Nicolas Almagro. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.