RallyIQ

Game plan

Lucas Pouille v Karen Khachanov

Every number combines what Lucas Pouille does well with what Karen Khachanov allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Lucas Pouille wins, best of 3 27%90%: 11%–51% · best of 5: 22%
Serve points won 61.8% / 66.8% Lucas / Karen · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 32%serve 62.2% / 66.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Lucas Pouille's record against Karen Khachanov's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −5.1 on serve, −1.6 on return vs expectation (654 points); head-to-head: +5.1 on serve, −4.1 on return vs expectation (342 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerLucasKaren
Direction choice−0.02 ±0.08
better than 52%
+0.01 ±0.06
better than 59%
Shot selection+0.05 ±0.16
better than 60%
−0.28 ±0.08
better than 25%
Execution−0.99 ±0.48
better than 26%
+0.50 ±0.28
better than 84%
Points left on the table2.56 ±0.14
lower than 54%
2.41 ±0.10
lower than 72%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Lucas Pouille −0.25, Karen Khachanov +0.05. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Lucas Pouille serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowLucas winsv KarenMatchupOptimal
Wide44%71%74%72.0%±4.357% ▲
Body10%65%64%66.2%±8.50% ▼
T46%74%76%75.2%±4.543% ▼

Optimal v Karen Khachanov: +0.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowLucas winsv KarenMatchupOptimal
Wide46%74%76%77.3%±4.440% ▼
Body7%61%65%63.1%±10.30% ▼
T47%74%72%73.8%±4.560% ▲

Optimal v Karen Khachanov: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Karen Khachanov serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowKaren winsv LucasMatchupOptimal
Wide50%73%77%76.8%±4.163% ▲
Body5%63%68%67.0%±9.50% ▼
T45%73%78%76.5%±4.137% ▼

Optimal v Lucas Pouille: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +0.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowKaren winsv LucasMatchupOptimal
Wide52%74%76%77.3%±3.965% ▲
Body6%61%63%60.7%±10.80% ▼
T42%69%78%76.0%±4.735% ▼

Optimal v Lucas Pouille: +1.0±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Lucas Pouille returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarenValue
FH through the middle35%+4.3+1.4+1.3+6.9±2.1
FH down the line21%+1.7−1.1+1.9+2.4±3.9
FH slice through the middle18%−4.2+1.2+0.1−2.9±2.1
FH crosscourt14%+5.5−0.4+0.9+5.9±3.8
FH slice down the line7%−4.3+1.1+0.2−2.9±3.2

Lean FH through the middle: +4.1±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (462 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarenValue
BH through the middle48%+6.4−3.4+1.7+4.8±1.8
BH crosscourt19%+8.8−1.3+0.3+7.8±3.0
BH down the line16%+4.2+0.6+0.4+5.3±4.3
BH slice through the middle9%−4.2−0.4+0.6−4.0±2.2
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5+2.2+1.5+4.2±2.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.8±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (619 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarenValue
FH through the middle56%−3.5−0.8±0.0−4.3±2.5
FH down the line23%−1.8−2.6+0.6−3.8±4.2
FH crosscourt21%−0.2−0.2+2.3+1.9±4.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.8±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (95 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv KarenValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−1.1+0.6−3.4±1.8
BH crosscourt27%+1.0−2.5−0.8−2.3±2.6
BH down the line18%−0.2+2.0−1.8±0.0±4.8
FH through the middle3%−2.9−0.6±0.0−3.5±1.8
FH inside-out3%+1.0+0.9+0.6+2.4±3.1

Lean BH down the line: +2.1±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (387 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Karen Khachanov returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LucasValue
FH through the middle36%+4.3+0.6−0.3+4.5±2.0
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2−0.9−0.1−5.2±2.0
FH crosscourt14%+5.5+0.4−0.9+5.0±3.9
FH down the line11%+1.7+1.1+3.1+5.9±4.0
FH slice down the line7%−4.3−0.5−1.9−6.7±3.0

Lean FH down the line: +5.0±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1496 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LucasValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+0.5+0.2+7.1±2.0
BH crosscourt32%+8.8+1.1−1.1+8.7±2.8
BH down the line8%+4.2+4.2+0.8+9.2±4.5
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.6+0.5−4.2±2.4
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−2.2+0.6−1.1±3.0

Lean BH down the line: +2.9±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1202 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LucasValue
FH through the middle53%−3.5−1.0−1.5−6.0±2.3
FH crosscourt26%−0.2+0.6−1.7−1.3±4.2
FH down the line18%−1.8−0.4−0.2−2.3±4.4
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−2.1−1.0−15.8±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.1±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (443 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv LucasValue
BH crosscourt49%+1.0+1.1+1.5+3.6±2.4
BH through the middle37%−2.9+2.3+0.9+0.3±1.9
BH down the line6%−0.2+2.3+3.7+5.9±4.9
FH through the middle5%−2.9+0.9−1.5−3.5±2.2
FH inside-out2%+1.0−0.2−0.2+0.6±3.3

Lean BH down the line: +3.8±4.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (854 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Lucas Pouille

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · rally+5.2±5.4+1.6+3.6
FH volley to their backhand · rally+3.1±5.8+0.2+2.9
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.3±2.4+0.1+2.2
FH to their backhand · rally+2.2±1.7+0.9+1.3
FH slice to the middle · return+1.9±2.1+1.5+0.4
BH slice to their backhand · return +1+1.6±2.4−0.1+1.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1−4.5±4.3−4.3−0.2
FH to their forehand · return +1−4.4±3.2−3.6−0.9
BH to the middle · serve +1−3.3±2.1−3.3±0.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1−3.2±2.5−2.4−0.7
FH to their backhand · return +1−2.9±3.1−0.1−2.8

Karen Khachanov

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+6.2±3.7+3.5+2.7
FH to the middle · return +1+2.9±2.4+1.4+1.5
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.5±2.5+0.8+1.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.9±2.0+0.6+1.3
FH to the middle · serve +1+1.9±2.0+1.9±0.0
BH to the middle · return+1.9±1.4+1.7+0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · serve +1−2.3±2.1+0.4−2.7
FH to the middle · return−2.2±1.6−0.9−1.4
BH to their backhand · rally−1.8±1.5±0.0−1.8
BH to their backhand · return +1−1.5±2.5−1.4−0.1
FH to their forehand · return +1−1.5±3.2−0.8−0.6

Against Karen Khachanov-like opponents

Lucas Pouille vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–62.2%32.4%
Players most similar to Karen Khachanov5 57.5%29.4%
Karen Khachanov (charted head-to-head)2 67.4%29.7%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Hubert Hurkacz, Brandon Nakashima, Tommy Paul, Novak Djokovic, Alexander Shevchenko, Laslo Djere, Alexandre Muller, Gregoire Barrere, Denis Istomin. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head