RallyIQ

Game plan

Marco Cecchinato v Dusan Lajovic

Every number combines what Marco Cecchinato does well with what Dusan Lajovic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Marco Cecchinato wins, best of 3 65%90%: 43%–82% · best of 5: 68%
Serve points won 65.4% / 62.4% Marco / Dusan · tour 61.3%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 62%serve 65.0% / 62.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Marco Cecchinato's record against Dusan Lajovic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: ±0.0 on serve, +0.3 on return vs expectation (483 points); head-to-head: +10.5 on serve, +0.4 on return vs expectation (119 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMarcoDusan
Direction choice+0.12 ±0.11
better than 85%
±0.00 ±0.10
better than 57%
Shot selection−0.31 ±0.19
better than 23%
−0.28 ±0.16
better than 25%
Execution−0.64 ±0.76
better than 39%
+0.03 ±0.42
better than 70%
Points left on the table2.52 ±0.12
lower than 58%
2.65 ±0.16
lower than 46%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Marco Cecchinato serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarco winsv DusanMatchupOptimal
Wide41%71%77%75.4%±5.554% ▲
Body7%64%71%71.5%±10.60% ▼
T53%69%75%68.8%±5.746% ▼

Optimal v Dusan Lajovic: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarco winsv DusanMatchupOptimal
Wide62%67%75%69.5%±5.375% ▲
Body7%55%67%59.5%±12.90% ▼
T31%67%69%64.6%±7.525% ▼

Optimal v Dusan Lajovic: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Dusan Lajovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDusan winsv MarcoMatchupOptimal
Wide48%65%74%66.2%±7.144% ▼
Body10%61%71%68.2%±9.623% ▲
T43%67%73%65.0%±6.433% ▼

Optimal v Marco Cecchinato: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDusan winsv MarcoMatchupOptimal
Wide57%66%72%65.0%±5.770% ▲
Body11%64%62%63.5%±11.10% ▼
T32%63%76%67.6%±7.930% ▼

Optimal v Marco Cecchinato: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Marco Cecchinato returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3−0.3+2.5+6.5±2.6
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+2.3+1.9+9.6±4.2
FH slice through the middle17%−4.2−1.8+0.5−5.5±2.3
FH down the line15%+1.7−2.4+2.7+2.1±4.2
FH slice crosscourt5%−4.3+0.1+0.6−3.6±2.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.3±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (184 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
BH through the middle32%+6.4+2.9+1.9+11.2±2.2
BH crosscourt25%+8.8−4.6+2.6+6.9±2.9
BH slice through the middle19%−4.2−2.0−0.5−6.6±2.4
BH down the line12%+4.2−1.4−0.9+1.9±4.5
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−2.8+0.2−2.0±3.0

Lean BH through the middle: +7.4±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (414 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5+1.4+1.2−0.9±2.8
FH down the line30%−1.8−5.3+3.0−4.1±4.5
FH crosscourt26%−0.2−0.4+0.8+0.2±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.8±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (70 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DusanValue
BH crosscourt37%+1.0−1.9−0.9−1.8±2.9
BH through the middle31%−2.9−3.5−0.3−6.6±2.2
BH down the line10%−0.2−0.4+2.7+2.2±4.7
FH through the middle7%−2.9+1.2+1.2−0.5±2.2
BH slice crosscourt4%−4.0−1.2−0.5−5.7±1.9

Lean BH down the line: +5.4±4.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (211 returns charted)

Dusan Lajovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcoValue
FH through the middle46%+4.3+1.6−0.9+4.9±2.5
FH crosscourt27%+5.5+0.1+1.3+6.9±4.2
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.3−0.7−5.2±2.3
FH down the line10%+1.7+1.2+2.1+5.0±4.5
FH slice crosscourt4%−4.3±0.0−0.1−4.4±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.2±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (533 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcoValue
BH through the middle28%+6.4+2.6+0.2+9.2±2.3
BH slice through the middle24%−4.2+0.6−0.7−4.3±2.3
BH crosscourt23%+8.8−0.1−2.0+6.8±3.1
BH slice crosscourt16%+0.5−1.1+0.8+0.3±2.9
BH down the line7%+4.2−2.1−0.1+2.1±4.6

Lean BH through the middle: +6.2±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (727 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcoValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5+2.4+1.2+0.1±2.9
FH crosscourt36%−0.2+0.8+0.6+1.2±4.3
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.6+0.3−0.9±4.6
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7−1.0+0.3−13.4±1.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.2±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (187 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcoValue
BH through the middle26%−2.9+0.9+0.6−1.5±2.4
BH crosscourt23%+1.0−0.7−0.7−0.3±3.1
FH through the middle18%−2.9+0.7+1.2−0.9±2.4
FH inside-in13%+0.6−0.9+0.6+0.3±4.3
FH inside-out9%+1.0±0.0+0.3+1.3±3.7
BH down the line3%−0.2+0.2+1.9+1.9±4.7

Lean BH down the line: +3.2±4.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (462 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Marco Cecchinato

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return +1+4.6±3.6+2.8+1.8
FH to their forehand · return+4.0±5.7+3.1+0.9
FH to their backhand · rally+3.3±2.6+1.7+1.6
FH to their forehand · return +1+3.3±4.9+3.5−0.2
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.2±4.1+1.7+1.5
BH to the middle · return+2.6±2.2+2.3+0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−7.6±4.9−9.3+1.7
BH to their forehand · return−4.6±5.9−3.5−1.1
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.4±3.2−2.3−1.1
FH to the middle · return +1−3.2±3.6−1.3−1.9
BH to the middle · return +1−1.7±3.0+1.1−2.8

Dusan Lajovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+4.9±4.8+1.0+3.9
FH to their forehand · return +1+4.8±4.9+1.2+3.6
BH to the middle · return+4.6±2.4+3.0+1.6
FH to their backhand · return +1+3.3±4.8+1.9+1.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.0±3.8+1.1+1.8
FH to the middle · return+1.9±2.7+1.9±0.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1−6.9±6.7±0.0−6.9
BH to their forehand · serve +1−6.1±6.7−3.4−2.7
BH to their backhand · serve +1−5.8±3.9−3.2−2.6
BH to their backhand · rally−2.8±2.2−1.9−1.0
BH to their forehand · rally−2.7±4.4−1.9−0.8

Against Dusan Lajovic-like opponents

Marco Cecchinato vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–61.4%33.7%
Players most similar to Dusan Lajovic2 61.9%31.6%
Dusan Lajovic (charted head-to-head)1 76.3%35.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Casper Ruud, Ben Shelton, Lorenzo Musetti, Brandon Nakashima, Tallon Griekspoor, Thiago Seyboth Wild, Dominic Thiem, Fernando Verdasco, Tommy Robredo, Tennys Sandgren. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head