RallyIQ

Game plan

Mariano Navone v Juan Carlos Ferrero

Every number combines what Mariano Navone does well with what Juan Carlos Ferrero allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Mariano Navone wins, best of 3 23%90%: 6%–53% · best of 5: 18%
Serve points won 57.7% / 63.3% Mariano / Juan · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 26%serve 57.8% / 62.8%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Mariano Navone's record against Juan Carlos Ferrero's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −4.1 on serve, −24.6 on return vs expectation (93 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMarianoJuan
Direction choice−0.01 ±0.09
better than 54%
+0.06 ±0.07
better than 71%
Shot selection−0.08 ±0.23
better than 43%
+0.05 ±0.09
better than 59%
Execution+0.24 ±0.59
better than 77%
+0.23 ±0.42
better than 77%
Points left on the table2.33 ±0.12
lower than 81%
2.21 ±0.13
lower than 91%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Mariano Navone serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMariano winsv JuanMatchupOptimal
Wide32%64%72%63.1%±7.737% ▲
Body18%50%73%60.6%±11.15% ▼
T49%65%80%71.5%±6.858% ▲

Optimal v Juan Carlos Ferrero: +0.7±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMariano winsv JuanMatchupOptimal
Wide52%62%72%62.1%±6.853%
Body20%59%61%57.6%±11.67% ▼
T27%67%74%69.4%±8.340% ▲

Optimal v Juan Carlos Ferrero: +0.5±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Juan Carlos Ferrero serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJuan winsv MarianoMatchupOptimal
Wide38%67%69%62.8%±7.125% ▼
Body7%61%61%58.9%±13.27%
T55%75%64%65.0%±7.568% ▲

Optimal v Mariano Navone: +0.1±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJuan winsv MarianoMatchupOptimal
Wide59%65%61%52.0%±6.946% ▼
Body7%64%51%52.4%±14.47%
T34%67%64%58.6%±8.647% ▲

Optimal v Mariano Navone: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Mariano Navone returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JuanValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3+1.2−0.1+5.4±2.7
FH crosscourt22%+5.5−0.1−1.3+4.2±4.2
FH down the line17%+1.7±0.0−2.5−0.8±4.4
FH slice through the middle11%−4.2−0.1+1.6−2.8±2.3
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−0.3+1.3−3.3±2.3

Lean FH through the middle: +2.7±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (237 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JuanValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.7+1.0+9.0±2.4
BH crosscourt40%+8.8+0.1+1.7+10.5±3.0
BH down the line11%+4.2+1.6+0.7+6.5±4.5
BH slice through the middle3%−4.2−0.3+2.3−2.2±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.5±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (268 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JuanValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5+1.2−0.4−2.7±2.8
FH crosscourt32%−0.2+1.8+0.7+2.3±4.3
FH down the line21%−1.8−1.8−0.5−4.1±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.7±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (84 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JuanValue
BH crosscourt49%+1.0+0.5−1.1+0.5±2.8
BH through the middle45%−2.9−0.1−0.3−3.2±2.3
BH down the line6%−0.2−0.2−0.5−1.0±4.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.8±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (153 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Juan Carlos Ferrero returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
FH through the middle48%+4.3−1.5+2.7+5.5±2.7
FH down the line19%+1.7+4.2+1.3+7.2±4.4
FH crosscourt19%+5.5−0.3+4.9+10.1±4.2
FH slice through the middle7%−4.2±0.0−0.6−4.9±1.9
FH slice crosscourt3%−4.3+0.4±0.0−3.9±1.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.6±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (539 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4−2.1+1.9+6.3±2.2
BH crosscourt39%+8.8+0.1+1.7+10.6±2.9
BH down the line9%+4.2−1.2+2.2+5.1±4.6
BH slice through the middle6%−4.2−0.8+0.1−4.9±2.3
BH slice down the line3%−8.4−2.0±0.0−10.4±2.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (535 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
FH through the middle44%−3.5−1.7+1.6−3.6±2.8
FH crosscourt36%−0.2+0.9+2.3+2.9±4.3
FH down the line13%−1.8−0.5−2.0−4.3±4.7
BH through the middle4%+0.1+0.7−0.4+0.4±1.9
BH inside-out2%+0.9−0.9+0.3+0.3±3.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.0±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (249 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarianoValue
BH crosscourt55%+1.0+0.7+1.5+3.2±2.9
BH through the middle36%−2.9−1.4−0.4−4.7±2.3
BH down the line9%−0.2+1.1+0.3+1.1±4.8
FH through the middle1%−2.9+0.7+1.6−0.6±2.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.0±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (505 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Mariano Navone

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · rally+2.5±1.5+1.5+1.0
FH to the middle · return+2.1±2.3+1.9+0.2
BH to their backhand · rally+1.8±1.4+1.4+0.4
FH to their forehand · return+1.7±4.2+1.9−0.2
BH to the middle · return+1.4±1.9+1.2+0.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.4±2.7−0.4+1.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−4.3±3.9−2.4−2.0
BH to the middle · serve +1−3.3±2.4−0.5−2.8
BH slice to their backhand · rally−3.3±2.3−4.0+0.7
FH to their backhand · rally−1.7±1.9−1.3−0.4
BH to their forehand · rally−1.7±3.4−0.1−1.6

Juan Carlos Ferrero

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return+5.4±4.2+0.8+4.6
BH to their backhand · return+3.4±2.3−0.3+3.6
BH to the middle · return +1+3.3±2.3+1.6+1.7
BH to their forehand · return+2.6±4.4+0.1+2.5
BH to their forehand · return +1+1.8±4.8+2.7−0.9
BH to their backhand · rally+1.7±1.5+0.4+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1−4.3±2.9−1.9−2.4
FH to their forehand · serve +1−3.4±3.2−1.1−2.3
FH to their forehand · return +1−2.4±3.9−1.9−0.5
FH to their backhand · rally−1.8±2.1−1.5−0.3
BH to their forehand · rally−1.4±3.0+0.3−1.7

Against Juan Carlos Ferrero-like opponents

Mariano Navone vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–55.5%43.1%
Players most similar to Juan Carlos Ferrero1 52.6%11.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Flavio Cobolli, Cameron Norrie, Gael Monfils, Jack Draper, David Goffin, Nicolas Almagro, Nikolay Davydenko, David Nalbandian, Marcelo Rios, Michael Chang. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.