RallyIQ

Game plan

Mark Philippoussis v Boris Becker

Every number combines what Mark Philippoussis does well with what Boris Becker allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Mark Philippoussis wins, best of 3 30%90%: 15%–50% · best of 5: 26%
Serve points won 67.8% / 72.2% Mark / Boris · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 35%serve 68.0% / 71.3%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Mark Philippoussis's record against Boris Becker's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.1 on serve, −6.0 on return vs expectation (614 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMarkBoris
Direction choice+0.07 ±0.14
better than 74%
+0.03 ±0.05
better than 65%
Shot selection+0.32 ±0.21
better than 82%
+0.33 ±0.11
better than 83%
Execution−1.40 ±0.61
better than 12%
−0.37 ±0.22
better than 50%
Points left on the table3.53 ±0.34
lower than 8%
3.75 ±0.16
lower than 5%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Mark Philippoussis serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMark winsv BorisMatchupOptimal
Wide46%81%73%81.6%±3.559% ▲
Body7%66%66%67.8%±8.10% ▼
T47%80%72%77.5%±4.241% ▼

Optimal v Boris Becker: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMark winsv BorisMatchupOptimal
Wide50%79%70%76.4%±4.151% ▲
Body4%63%61%61.0%±10.50% ▼
T46%79%71%78.8%±4.149% ▲

Optimal v Boris Becker: +0.2±0.2 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Boris Becker serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBoris winsv MarkMatchupOptimal
Wide41%78%79%82.9%±3.537% ▼
Body9%70%65%71.3%±7.40% ▼
T50%81%83%87.2%±2.863% ▲

Optimal v Mark Philippoussis: +0.6±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBoris winsv MarkMatchupOptimal
Wide49%78%78%81.9%±3.448%
Body12%71%64%71.2%±8.50% ▼
T39%75%77%79.7%±4.152% ▲

Optimal v Mark Philippoussis: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Mark Philippoussis returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3−2.7−1.6−0.1±2.0
FH down the line30%+1.7−4.1−0.8−3.2±3.4
FH crosscourt17%+5.5−5.3+1.5+1.7±3.5
FH slice through the middle3%−4.2+0.8+0.1−3.4±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.5±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (386 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
BH slice through the middle32%−4.2±0.0−1.9−6.1±1.7
BH through the middle21%+6.4−3.4−4.2−1.2±2.1
BH slice crosscourt21%+0.5+1.5+1.7+3.8±2.4
BH crosscourt10%+8.8−3.2−3.6+2.0±2.9
BH down the line9%+4.2−4.8−4.1−4.7±3.8

Lean BH slice crosscourt: +5.4±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (480 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
FH through the middle39%−3.5−1.3−1.2−5.9±2.3
FH down the line30%−1.8−2.1+2.0−1.8±3.8
FH crosscourt25%−0.2±0.0+2.1+1.9±3.5
BH through the middle6%+0.1−0.9−1.8−2.6±1.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.4±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (129 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BorisValue
BH slice crosscourt28%−4.0+3.0+2.1+1.1±2.0
BH through the middle22%−2.9+0.6−1.8−4.1±1.9
BH crosscourt17%+1.0+0.2+1.8+3.0±2.5
BH slice through the middle15%−11.3+0.7+0.5−10.1±2.0
BH slice down the line7%−9.3+0.9+6.1−2.3±3.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.8±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (405 returns charted)

Boris Becker returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarkValue
FH through the middle42%+4.3−1.3−0.8+2.1±2.0
FH down the line34%+1.7+2.1−2.0+1.8±3.4
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+2.7−1.9+6.3±3.6
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2+2.6+0.1−1.5±2.1
FH slice down the line1%−4.3−1.1+0.1−5.3±2.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.7±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (2642 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarkValue
BH through the middle29%+6.4−2.2−3.7+0.5±1.9
BH slice through the middle20%−4.2+3.0−0.5−1.7±1.9
BH down the line18%+4.2+0.1−3.2+1.1±3.7
BH slice crosscourt15%+0.5+5.9−1.0+5.4±2.5
BH crosscourt12%+8.8+1.6−1.7+8.7±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.1±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (3917 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarkValue
FH through the middle36%−3.5+0.8−1.4−4.0±2.5
FH down the line32%−1.8+2.2−4.1−3.6±4.2
FH crosscourt28%−0.2+2.8+1.0+3.5±4.0
BH slice through the middle1%−6.9+0.5+0.2−6.2±1.9
BH inside-in1%+2.5+2.9−0.8+4.5±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.3±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (747 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarkValue
BH through the middle26%−2.9−1.9−1.5−6.3±1.8
BH slice crosscourt21%−4.0+3.0+1.5+0.4±2.1
BH crosscourt19%+1.0+6.4−0.8+6.6±2.5
BH down the line13%−0.2−2.4+0.5−2.2±4.2
BH slice through the middle10%−11.3+3.9+0.2−7.2±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.3±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (2680 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Mark Philippoussis

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH slice to their forehand · return+7.8±4.6+1.9+5.9
FH volley to their forehand · serve +1+5.0±6.6+4.9±0.0
BH to their backhand · serve +1+4.1±3.6+2.4+1.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.4±4.1+1.0+2.4
BH slice to their backhand · rally+2.6±3.2+2.0+0.6
FH to their forehand · return+2.4±5.6−2.0+4.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · rally−9.9±3.1−4.9−5.0
BH to their forehand · return +1−9.1±6.3−7.1−2.0
BH to the middle · return +1−8.0±3.5−0.2−7.7
FH volley to their backhand · serve +1−7.5±5.9−6.3−1.2
FH to their backhand · return−6.9±4.8−8.8+1.9

Boris Becker

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally+12.0±4.9+8.1+3.9
FH to their backhand · serve +1+8.7±5.1+8.8−0.2
FH to their backhand · return +1+8.3±5.3+3.7+4.6
BH volley to their backhand · serve +1+6.5±5.5+3.7+2.7
FH to their forehand · return +1+4.4±5.7+1.1+3.3
FH to their forehand · serve +1+4.1±5.2+7.3−3.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1−9.0±2.8−7.5−1.5
FH to the middle · rally−8.3±3.5−4.3−4.0
BH to the middle · rally−6.2±3.1−3.2−3.0
BH to their forehand · rally−5.7±5.7−2.1−3.6
BH to the middle · return−5.6±2.6−1.4−4.2

Against Boris Becker-like opponents

Mark Philippoussis vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.7%30.3%
Players most similar to Boris Becker3 66.2%22.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Tim Henman, Pete Sampras, Todd Martin, Richard Krajicek, Michael Stich, Malivai Washington, Guy Forget, Brad Gilbert, John Mcenroe. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.