RallyIQ

Game plan

Mark Philippoussis v Henri Leconte

Every number combines what Mark Philippoussis does well with what Henri Leconte allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Mark Philippoussis wins, best of 3 60%90%: 35%–81% · best of 5: 62%
Serve points won 72.8% / 70.6% Mark / Henri · tour 65.7%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 65%serve 73.0% / 69.7%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Mark Philippoussis's record against Henri Leconte's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.1 on serve, −6.0 on return vs expectation (614 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMarkHenri
Direction choice+0.07 ±0.14
better than 74%
−0.07 ±0.15
better than 38%
Shot selection+0.32 ±0.21
better than 82%
+0.40 ±0.21
better than 86%
Execution−1.40 ±0.61
better than 12%
−1.66 ±0.51
better than 7%
Points left on the table3.53 ±0.34
lower than 8%
4.18 ±0.35
lower than 2%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Mark Philippoussis serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMark winsv HenriMatchupOptimal
Wide46%81%71%79.3%±4.959% ▲
Body7%66%69%71.3%±10.10% ▼
T47%80%77%81.9%±5.641% ▼

Optimal v Henri Leconte: +0.4±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMark winsv HenriMatchupOptimal
Wide50%79%76%81.0%±5.663% ▲
Body4%63%60%59.5%±12.60% ▼
T46%79%65%73.9%±6.137% ▼

Optimal v Henri Leconte: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Henri Leconte serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowHenri winsv MarkMatchupOptimal
Wide30%70%79%76.5%±6.726% ▼
Body9%67%65%68.4%±11.30% ▼
T61%70%83%79.0%±5.274% ▲

Optimal v Mark Philippoussis: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowHenri winsv MarkMatchupOptimal
Wide41%72%78%77.1%±5.937% ▼
Body9%61%64%61.5%±13.20% ▼
T50%74%77%79.2%±5.963% ▲

Optimal v Mark Philippoussis: +0.6±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Mark Philippoussis returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HenriValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3−2.7−2.8−1.3±2.7
FH down the line30%+1.7−4.1−2.7−5.1±4.4
FH crosscourt17%+5.5−5.3−0.5−0.3±4.3
FH slice through the middle3%−4.2+0.8−0.5−3.9±1.7

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.1±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (386 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HenriValue
BH slice through the middle32%−4.2±0.0−1.3−5.6±2.3
BH through the middle21%+6.4−3.4−5.2−2.1±2.5
BH slice crosscourt21%+0.5+1.5+2.1+4.1±2.8
BH crosscourt10%+8.8−3.2−0.2+5.3±3.6
BH down the line9%+4.2−4.8−0.2−0.8±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.9±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (480 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HenriValue
FH through the middle39%−3.5−1.3−1.3−6.0±2.9
FH down the line30%−1.8−2.1+0.3−3.6±4.7
FH crosscourt25%−0.2±0.0+1.6+1.4±4.3
BH through the middle6%+0.1−0.9−0.9−1.7±1.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.6±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (129 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HenriValue
BH slice crosscourt28%−4.0+3.0−0.1−1.1±2.2
BH through the middle22%−2.9+0.6−0.9−3.2±2.3
BH crosscourt17%+1.0+0.2+4.1+5.4±3.3
BH slice through the middle15%−11.3+0.7+1.0−9.7±2.2
BH slice down the line7%−9.3+0.9−4.0−12.4±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.0±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (405 returns charted)

Henri Leconte returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarkValue
FH crosscourt44%+5.5−3.5−2.0±0.0±4.2
FH through the middle40%+4.3−4.9−0.8−1.5±2.7
FH down the line16%+1.7−1.7−1.9−1.9±4.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.9±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (225 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarkValue
BH through the middle29%+6.4−5.4−3.7−2.7±2.5
BH slice through the middle26%−4.2+0.9−0.5−3.8±2.3
BH crosscourt15%+8.8−2.8−3.2+2.8±3.6
BH slice down the line14%−8.4+3.8−1.0−5.6±3.5
BH down the line9%+4.2+0.2−1.7+2.7±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.8±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (466 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarkValue
FH crosscourt69%−0.2+1.9−4.1−2.4±4.4
FH through the middle19%−3.5−1.3−1.4−6.2±2.5
FH down the line12%−1.8−2.6+1.0−3.4±3.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +0.8±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (52 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarkValue
BH slice through the middle21%−11.3+1.1+0.2−10.0±2.4
BH crosscourt19%+1.0+2.1+0.5+3.6±3.3
BH through the middle19%−2.9−2.6−1.5−7.0±2.4
BH slice down the line13%−9.3+3.5+1.5−4.3±4.2
BH down the line9%−0.2−1.0−0.8−2.0±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.8±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (256 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on grass. Each player's grass record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Mark Philippoussis

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+4.1±6.2+0.6+3.4
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.9±3.3+2.4+0.6
FH to their backhand · rally+1.2±4.2−1.1+2.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally+0.5±3.2+2.0−1.5
BH to their backhand · return +1±0.0±5.5−0.5+0.5
FH to their backhand · serve +1−0.3±4.3+1.0−1.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−9.7±5.8−8.8−0.9
BH to their forehand · return +1−9.6±7.5−7.1−2.5
BH to the middle · rally−6.7±2.9−4.9−1.9
FH to their forehand · return−5.5±6.8−2.0−3.4
BH to the middle · return +1−5.4±3.9−0.2−5.2

Henri Leconte

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.9±4.6+4.1−0.2
FH to their backhand · rally+3.1±4.2+2.2+0.9
BH to their backhand · return +1+2.7±5.3+2.7±0.0
BH to their forehand · return+2.4±6.8+1.4+1.0
BH volley to their backhand · serve +1+1.3±7.0−1.4+2.7
FH to their forehand · return+1.3±6.8+2.5−1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return−10.0±3.4−5.8−4.2
FH to the middle · return−7.7±3.9−5.9−1.8
FH to their backhand · return−5.7±5.7−3.3−2.4
BH to their backhand · return−4.5±5.3−1.3−3.2
BH to their forehand · rally−3.7±5.3−0.2−3.6

Against Henri Leconte-like opponents

Mark Philippoussis vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–68.7%30.3%
Players most similar to Henri Leconte3 66.2%22.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Gilles Muller, Tim Henman, Pete Sampras, Todd Martin, Boris Becker, Michael Stich, Malivai Washington, Guy Forget, John Mcenroe. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.