RallyIQ

Game plan

Michael Stich v Henri Leconte

Every number combines what Michael Stich does well with what Henri Leconte allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Michael Stich wins, best of 3 85%90%: 61%–96% · best of 5: 90%
Serve points won 71.4% / 62.8% Michael / Henri · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 82%serve 71.0% / 63.5%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Michael Stich's record against Henri Leconte's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +1.1 on serve, +1.7 on return vs expectation (1737 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMichaelHenri
Direction choice−0.23 ±0.10
better than 10%
−0.07 ±0.15
better than 38%
Shot selection+0.53 ±0.16
better than 95%
+0.40 ±0.21
better than 86%
Execution−1.39 ±0.40
better than 13%
−1.66 ±0.51
better than 7%
Points left on the table4.51 ±0.30
lower than 2%
4.18 ±0.35
lower than 2%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Michael Stich serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMichael winsv HenriMatchupOptimal
Wide40%77%71%75.1%±4.753% ▲
Body10%60%69%66.1%±9.50% ▼
T51%80%77%82.0%±5.047% ▼

Optimal v Henri Leconte: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMichael winsv HenriMatchupOptimal
Wide41%77%76%79.2%±5.554% ▲
Body8%68%60%64.8%±9.70% ▼
T51%75%65%68.4%±5.746% ▼

Optimal v Henri Leconte: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +6.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Henri Leconte serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowHenri winsv MichaelMatchupOptimal
Wide30%70%75%72.1%±6.517% ▼
Body9%67%71%73.6%±9.022% ▲
T61%70%77%71.7%±5.361%

Optimal v Michael Stich: +0.3±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +1.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowHenri winsv MichaelMatchupOptimal
Wide41%72%77%76.1%±5.432% ▼
Body9%61%70%68.2%±10.05% ▼
T50%74%75%76.7%±5.763% ▲

Optimal v Michael Stich: ±0.0±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Michael Stich returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HenriValue
FH through the middle53%+4.3−1.1−2.8+0.4±2.4
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+1.1−0.5+6.1±3.9
FH down the line20%+1.7−1.3−2.7−2.3±4.1
FH slice through the middle2%−4.2−1.0−0.5−5.7±1.9
BH slice through the middle1%−1.6+0.5−1.3−2.4±2.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.2±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (949 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HenriValue
BH slice through the middle26%−4.2−2.0−1.3−7.5±2.2
BH through the middle26%+6.4−4.8−5.2−3.5±2.2
BH slice crosscourt20%+0.5−1.5+2.1+1.1±2.6
BH crosscourt11%+8.8−1.0−0.2+7.5±3.5
BH down the line10%+4.2±0.0−0.2+4.0±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +9.6±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (1006 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HenriValue
FH through the middle35%−3.5−0.3−1.3−5.1±2.8
FH down the line32%−1.8−1.7+0.3−3.2±4.6
FH crosscourt25%−0.2−0.5+1.6+0.9±4.3
BH through the middle3%+0.1−0.4−0.9−1.2±1.6
FH slice through the middle3%−12.7+0.9±0.0−11.7±1.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.8±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (279 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv HenriValue
BH through the middle37%−2.9−0.1−0.9−3.8±2.0
BH crosscourt21%+1.0+1.2+4.1+6.3±3.1
BH down the line19%−0.2−2.1+0.2−2.1±4.6
BH slice crosscourt11%−4.0±0.0−0.1−4.1±2.3
BH slice through the middle8%−11.3−1.2+1.0−11.5±2.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +8.7±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (639 returns charted)

Henri Leconte returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MichaelValue
FH crosscourt44%+5.5−3.5−2.3−0.3±3.8
FH through the middle40%+4.3−4.9−1.9−2.6±2.5
FH down the line16%+1.7−1.7+2.3+2.3±4.1

Lean FH down the line: +3.1±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (225 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MichaelValue
BH through the middle29%+6.4−5.4−3.1−2.1±2.3
BH slice through the middle26%−4.2+0.9−2.0−5.2±2.2
BH crosscourt15%+8.8−2.8−2.0+4.0±3.4
BH slice down the line14%−8.4+3.8−0.9−5.5±3.3
BH down the line9%+4.2+0.2+1.9+6.4±4.2

Lean BH down the line: +8.0±4.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (466 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MichaelValue
FH crosscourt69%−0.2+1.9−2.2−0.5±4.2
FH through the middle19%−3.5−1.3−0.6−5.4±2.3
FH down the line12%−1.8−2.6+1.7−2.7±3.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.2±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (52 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MichaelValue
BH slice through the middle21%−11.3+1.1−1.0−11.1±2.4
BH crosscourt19%+1.0+2.1±0.0+3.1±2.9
BH through the middle19%−2.9−2.6−2.5−8.0±2.1
BH slice down the line13%−9.3+3.5−0.4−6.2±4.1
BH down the line9%−0.2−1.0+1.7+0.5±4.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.7±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (256 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Michael Stich

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+2.5±4.2−0.8+3.2
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.4±4.3+1.9+0.6
FH to their forehand · serve +1+1.1±5.1+2.3−1.3
FH to their forehand · return +1+0.8±4.4+0.7+0.2
FH to their backhand · return+0.8±3.7+0.3+0.5
BH slice to their backhand · rally+0.1±2.6+1.6−1.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−12.1±4.4−10.3−1.8
BH to the middle · return +1−9.9±2.7−6.4−3.5
BH to the middle · return−8.2±2.5−4.3−3.9
BH to the middle · rally−6.8±2.9−4.6−2.3
FH to the middle · return−4.4±2.2−1.3−3.1

Henri Leconte

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally+6.1±7.1+6.1−0.1
FH to their backhand · return +1+6.0±4.1−1.8+7.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1+3.6±3.4+4.1−0.5
FH to their forehand · return+2.4±4.6+0.6+1.9
FH to their backhand · rally+1.3±3.0+2.2−0.9
BH volley to their forehand · serve +1+1.1±6.1+1.9−0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1−10.3±4.6−6.4−3.9
BH to the middle · return−9.1±2.0−4.4−4.7
FH volley to the middle · serve +1−9.0±5.2−3.5−5.6
FH to their forehand · rally−7.1±3.6−5.9−1.2
FH to the middle · return−5.6±2.4−4.2−1.4

Against Henri Leconte-like opponents

Michael Stich vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.2%33.7%
Players most similar to Henri Leconte9 66.4%34.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Gilles Muller, Tim Henman, Mark Philippoussis, Pete Sampras, Todd Martin, Boris Becker, Malivai Washington, Guy Forget, John Mcenroe. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.