RallyIQ

Game plan

Milos Raonic v Jan Lennard Struff

Every number combines what Milos Raonic does well with what Jan Lennard Struff allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Milos Raonic wins, best of 3 55%90%: 34%–75% · best of 5: 56%
Serve points won 69.3% / 68.2% Milos / Jan · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 55%serve 69.3% / 68.2%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Milos Raonic's record against Jan Lennard Struff's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerMilosJan
Direction choice+0.11 ±0.05
better than 82%
−0.02 ±0.10
better than 52%
Shot selection+0.70 ±0.10
better than 97%
+0.40 ±0.15
better than 86%
Execution−0.74 ±0.34
better than 35%
−0.74 ±0.60
better than 35%
Points left on the table2.59 ±0.09
lower than 50%
2.93 ±0.18
lower than 24%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Milos Raonic −1.89, Jan Lennard Struff −1.17. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Milos Raonic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMilos winsv JanMatchupOptimal
Wide49%77%77%81.4%±3.143% ▼
Body7%74%65%75.0%±7.00% ▼
T44%85%79%87.8%±2.457% ▲

Optimal v Jan Lennard Struff: +0.7±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +4.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMilos winsv JanMatchupOptimal
Wide55%84%77%86.4%±2.650% ▼
Body7%67%62%66.7%±8.40% ▼
T37%80%75%82.3%±3.350% ▲

Optimal v Jan Lennard Struff: +1.0±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jan Lennard Struff serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJan winsv MilosMatchupOptimal
Wide47%78%76%80.2%±3.341% ▼
Body7%59%69%64.9%±8.40% ▼
T46%78%78%80.7%±3.359% ▲

Optimal v Milos Raonic: +0.6±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +1.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJan winsv MilosMatchupOptimal
Wide54%77%78%81.5%±3.267% ▲
Body7%60%66%62.7%±9.10% ▼
T40%75%76%78.8%±3.833% ▼

Optimal v Milos Raonic: +0.8±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Milos Raonic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JanValue
FH through the middle48%+4.3−0.8+0.1+3.6±1.9
FH crosscourt27%+5.5−3.8−0.1+1.6±3.6
FH down the line17%+1.7−2.5+0.4−0.5±3.9
FH slice through the middle5%−4.2−1.8+0.4−5.6±2.3
FH slice crosscourt1%−4.3−1.3−0.4−6.0±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +1.9±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (1484 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JanValue
BH through the middle39%+6.4−0.5−0.4+5.5±1.8
BH crosscourt24%+8.8−2.9−2.1+3.8±2.7
BH slice through the middle14%−4.2−1.5+0.8−5.0±2.1
BH down the line12%+4.2−0.9−2.7+0.5±4.2
BH slice crosscourt7%+0.5−1.5−2.8−3.7±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +3.8±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1719 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JanValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5−0.4+0.9−3.0±2.2
FH crosscourt32%−0.2+0.3−1.4−1.3±4.0
FH down the line19%−1.8−1.0−0.6−3.5±4.5
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7+0.2+0.5−12.0±1.7
FH slice down the line1%−9.4−0.6±0.0−10.0±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.5±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (383 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JanValue
BH through the middle38%−2.9−1.5+0.9−3.6±1.7
BH crosscourt30%+1.0−3.3+1.1−1.1±2.5
BH down the line10%−0.2+0.3−4.4−4.4±4.8
FH through the middle8%−2.9+0.1+0.9−1.9±2.1
FH inside-in4%+0.6−2.7−1.4−3.5±4.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.0±1.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (1074 returns charted)

Jan Lennard Struff returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MilosValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−0.2−1.3+2.8±2.0
FH crosscourt29%+5.5−0.1−3.1+2.3±3.7
FH down the line12%+1.7−1.7−1.5−1.5±4.0
FH slice through the middle7%−4.2+0.6−0.8−4.4±2.1
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3−0.3+0.6−4.0±2.5

Lean FH through the middle: +1.4±1.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (558 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MilosValue
BH through the middle53%+6.4+2.2−2.1+6.5±1.9
BH crosscourt31%+8.8−0.1−1.8+6.9±2.8
BH down the line8%+4.2−2.6−4.6−2.9±4.4
BH slice through the middle4%−4.2−2.1−0.2−6.5±2.1
BH slice down the line2%−8.4−1.8−2.8−13.0±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.2±2.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (612 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MilosValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5−0.8−0.6−4.8±2.5
FH crosscourt38%−0.2+0.4+0.9+1.0±4.3
FH down the line9%−1.8−2.7−4.2−8.7±4.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.9±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (162 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MilosValue
BH through the middle46%−2.9−0.2−0.4−3.5±1.7
BH crosscourt41%+1.0+0.6−1.6+0.1±2.3
BH down the line12%−0.2+6.6−2.8+3.6±4.7

Lean BH down the line: +4.7±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (499 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Milos Raonic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.2±2.4+3.5−0.3
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.3±2.1−0.5+0.8
BH to their backhand · serve +1+0.3±2.8−1.3+1.6
FH to their backhand · rally±0.0±1.8−1.9+1.9
BH slice to the middle · return−0.5±2.0−1.1+0.6
BH to the middle · return−0.5±1.3−0.5±0.0

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return−6.9±3.7−2.1−4.7
BH to the middle · rally−6.2±1.6−4.1−2.0
BH to their forehand · rally−5.8±3.3−5.9+0.1
BH to their backhand · rally−5.5±1.9−4.8−0.7
FH to their backhand · return−5.2±2.9−4.5−0.7

Jan Lennard Struff

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+3.1±3.3+3.0+0.1
BH to their forehand · return +1+1.9±4.5−0.5+2.4
BH to their forehand · rally+1.4±3.2−1.6+2.9
BH to their forehand · serve +1+1.1±4.2+0.9+0.2
BH to their backhand · return +1+1.0±2.4−0.7+1.7
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.3±2.3−0.2+0.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return−6.2±3.4−3.4−2.8
BH to their backhand · rally−3.7±1.5−3.2−0.5
BH to the middle · rally−3.0±1.5−2.6−0.4
BH to their forehand · return−3.0±3.7+1.4−4.3
FH to the middle · rally−2.9±1.7−1.8−1.2

Against Jan Lennard Struff-like opponents

Milos Raonic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–69.9%31.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Jiri Lehecka, James Duckworth, Rinky Hijikata, Marin Cilic, Roman Safiullin, Pierre Hugues Herbert, Lloyd Harris, Aslan Karatsev, Sam Querrey, Mardy Fish. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.