RallyIQ

Game plan

Nikolay Davydenko v Borna Coric

Every number combines what Nikolay Davydenko does well with what Borna Coric allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Nikolay Davydenko wins, best of 3 76%90%: 51%–91% · best of 5: 81%
Serve points won 66.0% / 60.4% Nikolay / Borna · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 71%serve 65.1% / 60.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Nikolay Davydenko's record against Borna Coric's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +8.9 on serve, +1.9 on return vs expectation (361 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerNikolayBorna
Direction choice−0.01 ±0.06
better than 56%
+0.17 ±0.06
better than 91%
Shot selection+0.02 ±0.07
better than 54%
−0.12 ±0.13
better than 37%
Execution+0.14 ±0.29
better than 74%
−0.53 ±0.35
better than 43%
Points left on the table2.24 ±0.09
lower than 89%
2.25 ±0.10
lower than 88%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Nikolay Davydenko serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNikolay winsv BornaMatchupOptimal
Wide38%70%78%75.6%±3.751% ▲
Body12%60%56%52.9%±9.40% ▼
T51%71%76%72.6%±4.149% ▼

Optimal v Borna Coric: +1.3±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNikolay winsv BornaMatchupOptimal
Wide50%67%76%70.1%±4.258% ▲
Body10%66%59%61.7%±9.00% ▼
T40%68%74%70.5%±4.642% ▲

Optimal v Borna Coric: +0.2±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Borna Coric serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowBorna winsv NikolayMatchupOptimal
Wide42%71%72%70.4%±4.134% ▼
Body5%58%62%56.8%±9.60% ▼
T52%73%73%70.9%±4.066% ▲

Optimal v Nikolay Davydenko: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowBorna winsv NikolayMatchupOptimal
Wide49%73%69%68.8%±4.342% ▼
Body6%59%61%56.1%±10.30% ▼
T45%72%69%68.9%±4.458% ▲

Optimal v Nikolay Davydenko: +0.4±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +0.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Nikolay Davydenko returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3±0.0−0.6+3.7±1.8
FH down the line23%+1.7−1.1−2.1−1.5±3.5
FH crosscourt19%+5.5−2.3−0.8+2.4±3.6
FH slice through the middle8%−4.2−1.2+1.3−4.1±2.2
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−0.1+0.9−3.5±3.2

Lean FH through the middle: +2.5±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (1320 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
BH through the middle43%+6.4+0.5+0.5+7.4±1.8
BH crosscourt21%+8.8−0.6−1.6+6.6±2.8
BH down the line15%+4.2+3.7−0.9+7.0±4.2
BH slice through the middle11%−4.2−1.4+0.2−5.4±2.1
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−2.2+0.9−0.8±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +3.0±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (1258 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
FH through the middle46%−3.5+1.9−0.1−1.7±2.3
FH crosscourt26%−0.2−0.2−0.7−1.1±4.2
FH down the line25%−1.8−2.6−1.0−5.4±4.5
BH through the middle3%+0.1−0.1+0.6+0.6±1.5

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.3±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (437 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv BornaValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9+0.9+0.6−1.4±1.6
BH crosscourt36%+1.0+0.5+0.6+2.1±2.2
BH down the line17%−0.2−0.7−5.6−6.6±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.1±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (1069 returns charted)

Borna Coric returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NikolayValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3−1.2+0.4+3.4±1.8
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−0.9−0.7+3.9±3.4
FH down the line13%+1.7+0.2−1.0+0.9±3.7
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2−2.6+2.2−4.6±2.3
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−3.0−0.3−7.6±2.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.1±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (791 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NikolayValue
BH through the middle40%+6.4−1.8+2.6+7.2±1.8
BH crosscourt39%+8.8−2.2+0.3+6.9±2.4
BH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.2+2.6−1.8±2.1
BH down the line6%+4.2−4.0+1.2+1.5±4.2
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.3+4.8+5.0±2.6

Lean BH through the middle: +1.6±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (704 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NikolayValue
FH through the middle42%−3.5−2.6+0.2−5.9±2.4
FH crosscourt35%−0.2−4.3−1.9−6.5±3.9
FH down the line21%−1.8+0.8−0.1−1.1±4.4
FH slice through the middle2%−12.7−1.2+0.4−13.5±1.5

Lean FH down the line: +4.1±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (266 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NikolayValue
BH crosscourt56%+1.0−0.4±0.0+0.5±2.4
BH through the middle34%−2.9−1.0+1.6−2.3±1.9
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.1+1.5+1.3±4.6
FH through the middle1%−2.9+0.7+0.2−1.9±1.7

Lean BH down the line: +1.7±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (534 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Nikolay Davydenko

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their backhand · rally+4.2±5.8+2.0+2.2
BH to the middle · return +1+2.4±1.7+1.3+1.1
BH volley to their forehand · rally+2.3±6.0−0.7+3.0
FH to the middle · return +1+1.8±2.2−0.1+1.9
BH to their backhand · serve +1+1.5±2.1−0.4+1.9
FH to the middle · return+0.8±1.5+1.1−0.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−5.1±2.4−2.7−2.4
BH to their forehand · serve +1−5.0±3.9−3.0−2.0
BH slice to their forehand · rally−4.2±3.3−4.1−0.2
FH to their backhand · return−3.3±2.8−1.5−1.8
BH to their forehand · return−3.2±3.4+1.3−4.6

Borna Coric

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · rally+1.9±2.8−1.2+3.1
FH volley to their forehand · rally+1.7±5.8+0.7+0.9
BH to the middle · return+1.2±1.3−2.0+3.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1+0.8±1.9+0.1+0.7
BH to the middle · serve +1+0.7±2.0+1.3−0.7
BH to the middle · return +1+0.7±1.9−0.6+1.3

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1−6.0±2.8−3.6−2.4
BH to their backhand · return +1−4.6±2.2−2.3−2.3
FH to their backhand · return +1−4.2±3.0−2.3−1.9
FH to their forehand · return−3.8±3.0−2.5−1.3
BH to their forehand · rally−3.8±2.6−1.8−2.0

Against Borna Coric-like opponents

Nikolay Davydenko vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–62.2%39.1%
Players most similar to Borna Coric3 71.4%39.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Andrey Rublev, Sebastian Korda, Jack Draper, Karen Khachanov, Taylor Fritz, Laslo Djere, David Goffin, Juan Martin Del Potro, Nicolas Almagro. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.