RallyIQ

Game plan

Novak Djokovic v Fabrice Santoro

Every number combines what Novak Djokovic does well with what Fabrice Santoro allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Novak Djokovic wins, best of 3 100%90%: 99%–100% · best of 5: 100%
Serve points won 70.5% / 48.6% Novak / Fabrice · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 100%serve 71.4% / 48.9%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Novak Djokovic's record against Fabrice Santoro's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.2 on serve, +0.4 on return vs expectation (9264 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerNovakFabrice
Direction choice+0.04 ±0.02
better than 70%
+0.19 ±0.11
better than 93%
Shot selection+0.04 ±0.03
better than 58%
−1.89 ±0.57
better than 0%
Execution+1.17 ±0.10
better than 97%
+2.60 ±0.69
better than 100%
Points left on the table2.24 ±0.03
lower than 89%
2.94 ±0.21
lower than 23%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Novak Djokovic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowNovak winsv FabriceMatchupOptimal
Wide46%74%73%74.2%±5.142% ▼
Body9%67%59%63.1%±10.30% ▼
T45%76%79%80.0%±5.358% ▲

Optimal v Fabrice Santoro: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowNovak winsv FabriceMatchupOptimal
Wide51%74%76%76.9%±5.264% ▲
Body9%63%56%55.7%±11.50% ▼
T40%73%66%66.5%±6.236% ▼

Optimal v Fabrice Santoro: +0.7±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +6.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Fabrice Santoro serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowFabrice winsv NovakMatchupOptimal
Wide49%61%69%56.2%±5.962% ▲
Body10%58%58%52.4%±10.00% ▼
T41%64%71%59.6%±6.938% ▼

Optimal v Novak Djokovic: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowFabrice winsv NovakMatchupOptimal
Wide56%65%69%60.9%±5.869% ▲
Body9%62%57%55.5%±11.20% ▼
T35%61%69%56.8%±7.331% ▼

Optimal v Novak Djokovic: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +1.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Novak Djokovic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabriceValue
FH through the middle49%+4.3+0.5−1.2+3.5±2.0
FH down the line20%+1.7+1.9+2.1+5.7±3.3
FH crosscourt18%+5.5+0.3+3.6+9.5±3.2
FH slice through the middle8%−4.2+1.5±0.0−2.7±1.3
FH slice down the line2%−4.3+1.4±0.0−2.9±1.8
BH inside-in0%+7.7+2.5+2.9+13.1±3.6

Lean BH inside-in: +8.8±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (11120 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabriceValue
BH through the middle38%+6.4+0.5+0.2+7.1±2.0
BH crosscourt24%+8.8+1.4+2.9+13.1±2.6
BH slice through the middle15%−4.2−0.2+1.4−3.1±1.9
BH down the line11%+4.2+2.2+3.1+9.5±3.5
BH slice crosscourt8%+0.5−1.0+1.6+1.1±2.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.8±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (9500 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabriceValue
FH through the middle54%−3.5+1.3+1.0−1.1±2.2
FH down the line28%−1.8+1.5+5.5+5.2±3.7
FH crosscourt16%−0.2+1.5−0.6+0.7±3.7
BH through the middle1%+0.1−1.2+0.1−1.0±2.1
BH inside-out1%+0.9−0.4+2.2+2.6±4.2

Lean FH down the line: +4.3±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (2581 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv FabriceValue
BH crosscourt43%+1.0+1.4+0.6+3.1±2.4
BH through the middle43%−2.9+0.7+0.1−2.1±1.9
BH down the line10%−0.2+2.0+2.2+3.9±4.0
FH through the middle2%−2.9−0.9+1.0−2.8±2.4
FH inside-out1%+1.0+0.1+5.5+6.5±3.7

Lean FH inside-out: +5.8±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (6220 returns charted)

Fabrice Santoro returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
FH slice through the middle32%−4.2+3.1+1.0−0.1±1.8
FH through the middle20%+4.3+0.8−0.4+4.6±2.2
FH slice down the line17%−4.3+5.4−0.1+1.1±2.7
FH slice crosscourt15%−4.3+1.9+2.7+0.3±2.5
FH down the line12%+1.7+1.6−0.2+3.1±3.2

Lean FH through the middle: +2.9±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (263 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
BH through the middle42%+6.4+1.4+0.5+8.3±2.0
BH crosscourt37%+8.8−1.9+0.7+7.6±2.6
BH down the line10%+4.2−1.7+0.3+2.7±3.3
BH slice down the line4%−8.4+1.3−1.0−8.1±2.3
BH slice through the middle4%−4.2+0.6+0.5−3.2±1.3

Lean BH through the middle: +2.1±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (214 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
FH through the middle27%−3.5+1.6+0.3−1.6±2.1
FH slice through the middle23%−12.7+2.5−0.8−11.0±2.3
FH slice crosscourt20%−12.5+2.6+1.1−8.8±2.8
FH slice down the line15%−9.4+1.1+0.9−7.5±3.0
FH down the line10%−1.8+1.4−2.6−2.9±2.8

Lean FH through the middle: +4.7±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (106 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv NovakValue
BH crosscourt48%+1.0+2.3+0.9+4.2±2.4
BH through the middle42%−2.9+0.2+0.6−2.1±1.9
BH down the line11%−0.2+4.0±0.0+3.8±3.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.7±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (130 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Novak Djokovic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their backhand · rally+11.6±6.5+2.4+9.1
FH to their forehand · return+10.2±4.4+3.0+7.2
FH to their backhand · return +1+8.9±4.5+1.9+7.0
FH to their forehand · return +1+8.8±4.0+1.5+7.2
FH volley to their forehand · rally+7.6±6.6+0.1+7.5
BH to their forehand · return +1+7.3±5.2+0.5+6.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their forehand · rally−6.2±6.8−0.9−5.3
BH to their backhand · rally−1.5±2.4+1.3−2.8
FH to the middle · return+0.6±2.6+1.1−0.5
FH to the middle · rally+0.7±2.6+1.3−0.7
BH to their backhand · return +1+1.0±3.4+1.3−0.3

Fabrice Santoro

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to their forehand · return+8.7±3.5+4.7+4.1
FH slice to the middle · rally+8.3±2.9+6.8+1.5
FH slice to their backhand · return+7.4±3.6+7.0+0.5
FH slice to their backhand · return +1+6.8±4.6+5.1+1.7
FH slice to their forehand · rally+6.2±3.9+5.5+0.7
FH slice to their backhand · rally+4.9±3.6+5.7−0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally−4.1±3.5−3.4−0.6
FH to their forehand · rally−2.8±3.7−2.7±0.0
FH to the middle · rally±0.0±2.5−0.1+0.1
BH to their backhand · return +1+0.1±3.5+0.8−0.7
BH to their forehand · rally+0.5±4.1+1.7−1.2

Against Fabrice Santoro-like opponents

Novak Djokovic vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.9%40.4%
Players most similar to Fabrice Santoro53 63.7%41.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Alex De Minaur, Daniil Medvedev, Jenson Brooksby, Jaume Munar, Richard Gasquet, Andy Murray, Damir Dzumhur, Mikhail Kukushkin, Jarkko Nieminen. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.