RallyIQ

Game plan

Pat Cash v Alex Molcan

Every number combines what Pat Cash does well with what Alex Molcan allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Pat Cash wins, best of 3 67%90%: 37%–89% · best of 5: 71%
Serve points won 65.2% / 61.6% Pat / Alex · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 67%serve 65.2% / 61.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Pat Cash's record against Alex Molcan's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads. A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerPatAlex
Direction choice−0.41 ±0.30
better than 2%
−0.14 ±0.11
better than 20%
Shot selection+0.94 ±0.13
better than 99%
−0.41 ±0.18
better than 17%
Execution−0.59 ±0.82
better than 42%
+0.53 ±0.66
better than 85%
Points left on the table5.43 ±0.66
lower than 0%
2.65 ±0.27
lower than 45%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Pat Cash serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPat winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide43%76%71%74.2%±6.456% ▲
Body19%59%51%46.5%±13.36% ▼
T39%77%81%82.2%±6.138%

Optimal v Alex Molcan: +1.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +10.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPat winsv AlexMatchupOptimal
Wide50%76%77%79.6%±6.550%
Body20%61%63%60.7%±12.87% ▼
T30%77%73%77.6%±6.843% ▲

Optimal v Alex Molcan: +1.1±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +4.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Alex Molcan serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlex winsv PatMatchupOptimal
Wide28%72%72%71.1%±8.241% ▲
Body19%61%57%54.3%±11.06% ▼
T52%66%75%65.9%±7.453%

Optimal v Pat Cash: +0.7±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +6.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlex winsv PatMatchupOptimal
Wide42%68%69%63.1%±7.642%
Body13%59%73%70.0%±11.00% ▼
T45%71%75%73.8%±7.858% ▲

Optimal v Pat Cash: +0.3±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Pat Cash returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH through the middle56%+4.3+1.4−1.1+4.5±2.7
FH down the line27%+1.7−0.6−1.1±0.0±4.0
FH crosscourt18%+5.5−1.7+1.3+5.1±4.4

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.7±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (389 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH through the middle39%+6.4+0.8+0.1+7.4±2.4
BH down the line18%+4.2+2.7−1.4+5.4±4.6
BH crosscourt16%+8.8−2.0+2.7+9.5±3.6
BH slice through the middle13%−4.2+1.7+1.7−0.8±2.5
BH slice crosscourt9%+0.5+3.2+0.6+4.3±3.0

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.1±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (476 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
FH through the middle45%−3.5−0.6+1.3−2.8±2.9
FH down the line30%−1.8+2.7+2.1+3.0±4.3
FH crosscourt25%−0.2+8.2+0.8+8.8±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.9±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (91 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlexValue
BH through the middle42%−2.9+1.3+1.3−0.3±2.4
BH down the line22%−0.2+4.3−4.2−0.1±4.9
BH crosscourt19%+1.0+3.7−0.8+3.9±3.3
BH slice crosscourt9%−4.0−1.2−0.2−5.4±2.1
BH slice through the middle5%−11.3+0.4−0.4−11.3±2.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.6±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (264 returns charted)

Alex Molcan returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PatValue
FH through the middle34%+4.3±0.0−1.0+3.2±2.8
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2−0.8±0.0−5.0±1.7
FH crosscourt19%+5.5+0.7−0.3+5.9±4.2
FH down the line10%+1.7−1.2−1.2−0.8±4.2
FH slice crosscourt6%−4.3+0.8±0.0−3.6±1.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.5±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (177 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PatValue
BH through the middle46%+6.4+1.1−3.4+4.1±2.4
BH crosscourt14%+8.8−2.6−4.0+2.2±3.5
BH slice through the middle14%−4.2−0.4+0.7−3.9±2.5
BH down the line11%+4.2+2.8−0.8+6.3±4.4
BH slice down the line10%−8.4−0.7−2.8−11.9±3.5

Lean BH down the line: +5.0±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (290 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PatValue
FH crosscourt50%−0.2−0.8+3.0+2.0±4.4
FH through the middle38%−3.5±0.0−0.6−4.1±2.8
FH down the line12%−1.8+1.1+2.6+2.0±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.4±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (86 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PatValue
BH through the middle66%−2.9+2.5−0.1−0.5±2.4
BH crosscourt23%+1.0+1.8+2.4+5.2±3.2
BH down the line11%−0.2+2.1+2.5+4.4±4.6

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.8±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (137 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Pat Cash

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return+4.3±4.3+3.0+1.3
FH to their backhand · return+3.0±3.8+1.2+1.8
BH slice to the middle · return+2.5±2.4+1.3+1.1
BH to the middle · return+2.1±1.9+0.7+1.4
FH to the middle · return+1.5±2.3+1.7−0.2
BH to their forehand · return +1+1.5±4.9+1.1+0.4

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to the middle · return +1−5.0±2.5−5.6+0.6
FH to their backhand · return +1−4.7±3.8−5.2+0.5
FH to their forehand · rally−4.3±3.4−3.1−1.2
BH to their backhand · return +1−3.8±3.5−4.0+0.2
BH to their backhand · rally−2.7±2.7−1.5−1.3

Alex Molcan

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · rally+6.2±2.7+3.0+3.2
BH to their forehand · return +1+5.8±4.8+2.5+3.3
BH to their backhand · return+4.1±3.2+2.7+1.5
BH to their forehand · rally+3.0±3.8+1.9+1.1
FH to their backhand · return+2.7±3.7+1.3+1.4
BH to the middle · return+0.6±2.0+2.3−1.7

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · rally−2.9±3.3−1.7−1.2
BH to the middle · rally−1.8±2.1+1.0−2.7
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.6±4.2−1.8+0.2
FH to their backhand · return +1−1.0±3.8+1.5−2.5
FH to their backhand · serve +1−0.6±3.4−1.9+1.3

Against Alex Molcan-like opponents

Pat Cash vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–65.3%36.4%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Learner Tien, Gael Monfils, Miomir Kecmanovic, Yoshihito Nishioka, Albert Ramos, Emil Ruusuvuori, Jiri Vesely, Juan Martin Del Potro, Guido Pella, Nikolay Davydenko. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.