RallyIQ

Game plan

Pedro Martinez v Marcos Giron

Every number combines what Pedro Martinez does well with what Marcos Giron allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Pedro Martinez wins, best of 3 21%90%: 5%–52% · best of 5: 16%
Serve points won 58.5% / 64.8% Pedro / Marcos · tour 63.5%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 19%serve 58.6% / 65.4%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. Both were charted enough in the last three seasons, so those carry the most weight. The result is then nudged by Pedro Martinez's record against Marcos Giron's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −0.5 on serve, +3.7 on return vs expectation (669 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerPedroMarcos
Direction choice−0.06 ±0.08
better than 43%
−0.12 ±0.14
better than 26%
Shot selection−0.06 ±0.23
better than 46%
−0.29 ±0.18
better than 24%
Execution+0.23 ±0.43
better than 77%
+0.02 ±0.52
better than 69%
Points left on the table2.66 ±0.12
lower than 43%
2.66 ±0.24
lower than 43%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Pedro Martinez +1.85, Marcos Giron +0.91. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Pedro Martinez serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowPedro winsv MarcosMatchupOptimal
Wide41%65%77%70.4%±5.639% ▼
Body11%59%68%64.1%±10.30% ▼
T48%68%79%72.3%±5.461% ▲

Optimal v Marcos Giron: +0.7±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowPedro winsv MarcosMatchupOptimal
Wide54%63%74%65.0%±5.854%
Body16%59%63%58.8%±11.23% ▼
T30%62%71%61.3%±7.043% ▲

Optimal v Marcos Giron: +0.4±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Marcos Giron serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowMarcos winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide50%65%75%68.2%±5.452% ▲
Body4%62%70%68.9%±11.20% ▼
T46%78%76%78.9%±5.048% ▲

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: ±0.0±0.3 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowMarcos winsv PedroMatchupOptimal
Wide55%72%71%71.1%±5.748% ▼
Body6%65%56%58.3%±12.30% ▼
T39%71%73%72.6%±5.952% ▲

Optimal v Pedro Martinez: +0.6±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +1.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Pedro Martinez returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcosValue
FH through the middle43%+4.3+2.1+4.1+10.6±2.4
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+1.1+0.4+7.0±4.2
FH slice through the middle13%−4.2+1.7−0.5−3.0±2.3
FH down the line12%+1.7+1.9+2.0+5.6±4.4
FH slice crosscourt8%−4.3+0.6+0.2−3.5±2.7

Lean FH through the middle: +4.6±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (426 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcosValue
BH through the middle41%+6.4+2.2+2.9+11.4±2.3
BH crosscourt27%+8.8−3.4+0.5+5.9±3.3
BH down the line13%+4.2−0.4+1.5+5.2±4.6
BH slice through the middle12%−4.2−1.5−1.1−6.8±2.5
BH slice crosscourt4%+0.5−1.5−1.5−2.5±2.9

Lean BH through the middle: +5.8±1.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (517 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcosValue
FH through the middle52%−3.5+1.2+2.0−0.3±2.7
FH crosscourt37%−0.2−0.4+4.9+4.2±4.4
FH down the line10%−1.8+0.6+1.0−0.1±4.0

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (107 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv MarcosValue
BH through the middle41%−2.9−0.2+2.0−1.1±2.1
BH crosscourt30%+1.0±0.0+0.6+1.6±2.9
BH down the line14%−0.2+5.2+2.3+7.3±5.0
FH inside-out7%+1.0−0.7+1.0+1.3±3.5
FH through the middle5%−2.9−0.7+2.0−1.6±2.1

Lean BH down the line: +6.1±4.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (340 returns charted)

Marcos Giron returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
FH through the middle52%+4.3+0.6+1.7+6.6±2.3
FH crosscourt20%+5.5+0.3+6.1+11.9±4.1
FH down the line14%+1.7−1.2+1.6+2.1±4.4
FH slice through the middle9%−4.2+1.0+1.7−1.5±2.3
FH slice crosscourt2%−4.3−0.5+0.1−4.7±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +6.1±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (463 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
BH through the middle34%+6.4+1.8+1.6+9.8±2.1
BH slice through the middle24%−4.2+1.5−1.4−4.2±2.4
BH crosscourt18%+8.8+1.1+1.7+11.6±3.0
BH slice crosscourt12%+0.5−1.7−2.2−3.4±2.9
BH slice down the line7%−8.4−1.9+1.5−8.8±3.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.7±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (501 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
FH through the middle59%−3.5+0.9+1.2−1.3±2.7
FH crosscourt28%−0.2−4.3−1.6−6.2±4.3
FH down the line13%−1.8+1.4−1.7−2.1±4.3

Lean FH through the middle: +1.4±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (97 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv PedroValue
BH through the middle42%−2.9+1.9+1.0±0.0±2.2
BH crosscourt36%+1.0−0.4+1.2+1.8±2.9
BH down the line8%−0.2+2.3−0.8+1.3±5.0
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.0−0.5±0.0−4.5±1.5
BH slice through the middle3%−11.3−1.0±0.0−12.2±1.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.7±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (392 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Pedro Martinez

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+7.0±4.9+2.1+4.9
BH to their forehand · rally+6.6±3.3+3.9+2.6
BH to their forehand · serve +1+5.4±4.5+3.3+2.1
FH to the middle · return +1+4.8±2.5+3.1+1.6
FH to the middle · return+4.4±1.9+0.9+3.5
FH to their forehand · rally+4.1±2.2+2.6+1.5

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · rally−2.4±2.9−0.1−2.3
BH slice to the middle · rally−2.4±2.0−0.4−2.0
FH to the middle · serve +1−1.6±2.3+2.2−3.7
BH slice to the middle · return−1.0±2.5−0.7−0.4
BH slice to their forehand · rally−0.8±3.3−0.6−0.1

Marcos Giron

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · return +1+7.8±4.9+0.3+7.5
BH to their forehand · return+4.6±4.4+1.9+2.7
BH to their forehand · serve +1+4.6±4.7−0.3+4.8
BH to the middle · return+4.5±1.7+1.3+3.3
BH to their backhand · return+3.3±2.3+0.3+2.9
BH to the middle · serve +1+3.0±2.3+2.9+0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH slice to the middle · rally−6.1±2.9−2.9−3.3
BH slice to the middle · rally−4.3±2.2−3.1−1.2
BH slice to their backhand · rally−2.7±2.2−1.8−0.9
FH to their backhand · rally−1.5±1.8−2.2+0.7
BH to their backhand · serve +1−0.8±2.8+0.7−1.5

Against Marcos Giron-like opponents

Pedro Martinez vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.3%34.6%
Players most similar to Marcos Giron4 57.1%35.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Casper Ruud, Jannik Sinner, Brandon Nakashima, Gael Monfils, Taylor Fritz, Rinky Hijikata, Arthur Cazaux, Dominic Thiem, Lloyd Harris, Andreas Seppi. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.